Is there an optimum length for an AR pistol barrel

2,326 Views | 18 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by SquirrellyDan
Horse with No Name
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What say you OB?

Purpose would be "because I can, for now".
Ridin' 'cross the desert. . .
Yesterday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Depends on caliber but if the purpose is "because I can" then I personally would go with the 6". Some 6" is shorter than others.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If using 5.56 I would not go any shorter than 10.5".
Daddy-O5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really depends on the caliber.
Horse with No Name
How long do you want to ignore this user?
5.56
Ridin' 'cross the desert. . .
DatTallArchitect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Horse with No Name said:

5.56
As stated by another poster, I wouldn't go below 10.5" for a 5.56. That said, plenty of people do go shorter.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In 5.56 10.5 or 11.5 are "optimal". Shorter and you lose too much velocity. Longer and you lose the practicality of a pistol - might as well go 14.5 + pin/weld or 16" instead.
Horse with No Name
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DatTallArchitect said:

Horse with No Name said:

5.56
As stated by another poster, I wouldn't go below 10.5" for a 5.56. That said, plenty of people do go shorter.
Is there a rule of thumb regarding caliber/length?

Bigger projectile for shorter barrel or some such?
Ridin' 'cross the desert. . .
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've heard most spec ops are moving to 11.5 for 5.56.

I've got a 10.5
DatTallArchitect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Horse with No Name said:

DatTallArchitect said:

Horse with No Name said:

5.56
As stated by another poster, I wouldn't go below 10.5" for a 5.56. That said, plenty of people do go shorter.
Is there a rule of thumb regarding caliber/length?

Bigger projectile for shorter barrel or some such?
There isn't a general rule. Some cartridges are designed to use faster burning powders than others. .300 blackout and 6.8 SPC were both designed for a shorter barrel length. There's also a factor of speed and rifling. There are others that can speak better to this, but (from my understanding) you want the bullet to get a full turn before leaving the barrel in order for it to stabilize.
JeremiahJohnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really depends on how far you are going to shoot. 10.3 or 11.5 are the recommended lengths. 11.5 would be 125FPS + faster

GarandThumb gives a pretty detailed description
Daddy-O5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
9" is truly optimal for the 300blk. To get max velocity out of the 6.8 you still have to be 16-18", but it still performs well out of shorter. I think most of the common rounds outside of the blackout you're balancing between performance and convenience under 16". Lots of 12.5" 6.8's and Grendels.
DatTallArchitect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When I was researching the 6.8 for my build, I remember seeing that it was designed for a shorter barrel than 16". It was developed for the Navy Seals, and they would definitely want a shorter barrel.

The 6.5 Grendel was designed for a 22" barrel, but, like you said, there are a lot of 12.5" SBRs and pistols out there.
Daddy-O5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we're both right here to an extent. Again, I'm strictly speaking in terms of max velocity, which I'm pretty certain is achieved at 16" or 18" (the google give me mixed results between 16-18"). It does however perform VERY well with minimal lost velocity out of a shorter barrel.

I'll yield to any true experts on the topic, just my understanding. I've got a 16" 6.8 and would love to add a 12.5" to the collection at some point.
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DatTallArchitect said:


The 6.5 Grendel was designed for a 22" barrel, but, like you said, there are a lot of 12.5" SBRs and pistols out there.


My 12" Grendel is less than 300 fps slower MV than my 20" shooting factory 123gr loads.

Short Grendels are fine.
DatTallArchitect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't say they weren't. Only stated they were designed for a longer barrel.
malenurse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yesterday said:

Depends on caliber but if the purpose is "because I can" then I personally would go with the 6". Some 6" is shorter than others.
Tell me about it...
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DatTallArchitect said:

Didn't say they weren't. Only stated they were designed for a longer barrel.


Just sharing some data. When the general rule of thumb is 50 fps less per inch, losing only 284 fps in 8" is remarkably good for a round "not designed" for short barrels.
swampstander
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Had a 10 inch.223 barrel for my T/C Contender. Loudest gun I ever shot. Blew flame 2 feet. Hated it. Sold it several years ago and bought a Super 14 in 7mm T/CU.
SquirrellyDan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After only ever shooting rifle length 556, I was shocked out how much louder a 10.5 inch barrel was. Not sure if it is actually a lot louder or it's just because you're a few inches closer to the end of the barrel, but either way it's maybe something to think about.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.