reddog90 said:
AgLA06 said:
reddog90 said:
You guys should actually research the dilute gene. It's not a matter of a holier than thou attitude, it's that people are purposefully breeding in a gene not found in the breed to get an exotic color solely to get more money for puppies.
Find me a single silver breeder that has clearances on hips, elbows, eyes, heart, CNM, EIC and any sort of titles on both parents and I'll pay attention. All of these things are common and expected from any reputable lab breeder selling puppies for what you pay for a silver pup from a backyard breeder.
Come on. They're doing the exact thing the breeders that created the labrador retriever did. Breeding for specific traits. The industry defense is a joke. I can see through it and don't even care about labs regardless of the color.
Saying "I'll pay attention when they get these things the industry won't let them get" doesn't make it any less holier than thou.
They aren't creating a new breed though. Are you familiar with any of the health clearances I listed? Have you ever campaigned a dog in any venue? The "industry" will "let" them...
I didn't know these things even existed until this thread. I was curious so I followed the links and spent an hour looking into it as I found it interesting.
It appears to me that the lab industry is and will continue to do everything to keep this from taking off. They're scared to death that the silver becomes the new big thing that take market share and they should be. the cross with a bird dog has the potential to strengthen the downside of labs considerably. If they weren't a threat and had all the problems suggested in cases other than bad breeders, no one would want one and there wouldn't be any reason to act like this. Even if just for a house dog.
Just look at what happened in the linked thread where the kennel had the silver that won the Potomac Obedience trial in 2007. The onslaught of attacks by the status quo was so intense and disgusting they had to remove all information about the dog from their website to keep the lab crazies at bay. Look at this thread alone. Full out attack over a post trying to sell a dog. No claim of hunting or field prowess. Just a pet and the reaction on here is sad. AKC won't register them nor let them compete in conformation shows due the lobbying of the lab industry (apparently the LRC determines everything). If it was purely about getting them designated as a new breed the lab industry could and should have pushed that with the AKC long ago and nipped the issue in the bud for good.
Look at what it took over decades to get yellow and even chocolate labs to be accepted. And they're "real" labs. They were culled and killed forever because they were "inferior". The lab industry was wrong about that as well, just like they could be about this. This is purely breeders trying to protect personal interests with a smear campaign.
It's plainly obvious to me and I have no intention to buy one nor care about labs in general. If you can't see that, there's no reason to even continue to have the conversation because your part of the bias.
Now do I think they should be listed as a lab? Who knows. I honestly don't intend to research it enough to make an educated decision on if it's a true recessive lab gene or must be a cross bred. But there are lots of species of dogs that have sub species. Maybe that's what this should be for the show crowd. However, if your stance is that they aren't labs, then I don't' see the point of caring because it can't impact the value of your dog.