Does the pilot captain have to climb completely to the top of that or are the doors lower down?

I always thought that was just the bilge pumping. Third Coast needs to get on this thread so he can answer questions.Ducks4brkfast said:
Why do they spray/pour water off the front of the ship?
sunchaser said:
That picture it is discharging ballast seawater. It's in port and going to be taking on cargo soon so it is starting to let out the ballast water it had in it's tanks. Ballast water must also be exchanged before it gets within 200 miles of shore so any aquatic life it picked up in another country doesn't make it to shore in the new place.Ducks4brkfast said:
Why do they spray/pour water off the front of the ship?
Doin they still need to deepen the channel or has that work been finished already?Furlock Bones said:correct.Brush Country said:
Thanks. I'm guessing it wouldn't be able to clear the existing bridge (one of the reasons they are building a new one).
they have not deepened the channel yet. the plan has been to dredge it to 52 feet. but, this may push them to go even deeper. this would really put the Corpus area back on the map.Kenneth_2003 said:Doin they still need to deepen the channel or has that work been finished already?Furlock Bones said:correct.Brush Country said:
Thanks. I'm guessing it wouldn't be able to clear the existing bridge (one of the reasons they are building a new one).
If you want to load VLCC size ships something like the LOOP in Louisiana is a cheaper and safer solution. Basically you have a pipeline go from the oil terminal to offshore in deeper water that terminates into a buoy. Tanker pulls up to buoy, work boat transfers mooring lines and loading hoses from buoy to tanker. Tanker hooks up to buoy and loads/offloads it's cargo which is transferred to/from shore.Furlock Bones said:they have not deepened the channel yet. the plan has been to dredge it to 52 feet. but, this may push them to go even deeper. this would really put the Corpus area back on the map.Kenneth_2003 said:Doin they still need to deepen the channel or has that work been finished already?Furlock Bones said:correct.Brush Country said:
Thanks. I'm guessing it wouldn't be able to clear the existing bridge (one of the reasons they are building a new one).

Furlock Bones said:they have not deepened the channel yet. the plan has been to dredge it to 52 feet. but, this may push them to go even deeper. this would really put the Corpus area back on the map.Kenneth_2003 said:Doin they still need to deepen the channel or has that work been finished already?Furlock Bones said:correct.Brush Country said:
Thanks. I'm guessing it wouldn't be able to clear the existing bridge (one of the reasons they are building a new one).
WOW!sunchaser said:
schmellba99 said:Don't know if it was the largest, but it was a big 'ol boy for sure. My older brother works for one of the companies that built it. Some of their sectional lifts were staggering amounts of weight - I think he said even Manitowoc stuttered a couple of times when they were discussing the lifts.Ag_07 said:
Somewhat off topic but I worked on the environmental work for that Oxy facility a few years ago when they bought the place.
The property was a deserted Naval base and Oxy purchased it and converted it to a terminal. The place already had the dock, offices, etc. They bought it, tore down a bunch of dorms and housing and put tanks on it. We saw some really cool stuff walking around a deserted Naval station.
Pretty cool to see it come full circle. I also hope someone gets pictures.
Wasn't the biggest platform in the Gulf (some Shell platform) assembled and sailed out of Port A recently?
They have another one getting ready to be built that is about the same size. Can't remember if it's slightly larger or smaller, thinking smaller though.
Prob true for liquid cargo, but like other Ports, the Port of CC handles a lot of dry cargo like grain and wind energy parts. They've also been wanting to get into the container game (recently had to scrap their container facility plans because they wanted to build the facility next to, and run a rail spur through, Portland TX and us residents have had enough already).RCR06 said:
Company I used to work for fabricated some calm buoys for pemex that were for a similar purpose as the loop. You could anchor them offshore then run a pipeline from th buoy to shore and instantly eliminate the need for a deep water port. When looking at dredging and raising bridges I would think offshore transfer would look a lot more appealing.
Shell MARS?Ag_07 said:
Somewhat off topic but I worked on the environmental work for that Oxy facility a few years ago when they bought the place.
The property was a deserted Naval base and Oxy purchased it and converted it to a terminal. The place already had the dock, offices, etc. They bought it, tore down a bunch of dorms and housing and put tanks on it. We saw some really cool stuff walking around a deserted Naval station.
Pretty cool to see it come full circle. I also hope someone gets pictures.
Wasn't the biggest platform in the Gulf (some Shell platform) assembled and sailed out of Port A recently?
Looked up Liberty of the Seas and she's 1,112' long with a beam of 128'. Looks like she's roughly the same dimensions, but her draught is significantly less at 30 ft.tx4guns said:
Wonder how it compares to the cruise ships in Galveston on size? See them all the time, and nothing I've seen come thru the jetties is bigger.
43m longer x 18m wider than Carnival Freedom. Big SOB.tx4guns said:
Wonder how it compares to the cruise ships in Galveston on size? See them all the time, and nothing I've seen come thru the jetties is bigger.
like the blades for wind turbines coming from china and being trucked to the panhandle?Brush Country said:Prob true for liquid cargo, but like other Ports, the Port of CC handles a lot of dry cargo like grain and wind energy parts. They've also been wanting to get into the container game (recently had to scrap their container facility plans because they wanted to build the facility next to, and run a rail spur through, Portland TX and us residents have had enough already).RCR06 said:
Company I used to work for fabricated some calm buoys for pemex that were for a similar purpose as the loop. You could anchor them offshore then run a pipeline from th buoy to shore and instantly eliminate the need for a deep water port. When looking at dredging and raising bridges I would think offshore transfer would look a lot more appealing.
As far as raising bridges, the existing Harbor Bridge is pretty much at the end of its useful life anyway, so they say.