Posted this on the real estate board, but I would like to hear what everyone here has to say.
My wife and I were under contract on a 1 acre lot near Magnolia that we will be building a custom home on. After the storms last week, I decided we needed to check it out to see how drainage was. We found what is basically a wet weather stream flowing through the middle of the lot, 10-15 yards wide, 12"+ deep. See the pictures below to get an idea how bad it is. At that point, we decided that really is no way to build on the lot, and our home builder basically agreed. Now, we don't close until July 27th, so our builder/realtor started the process to terminate the contract. The contract did state that the property was sold 'as-is', but it also stated that the seller would notify us, the buyer, of any flooding. We do know that it sits entirely outside the 100 year floodplain, but that is not the issue at hand here. Though I am curious if the legal definition of flooding requires being within the floodplain. I should add, nothing on the property prior to the rains last week indicated that a wet weather creek would flow through the lot.
I am curious what everyone thinks about receiving our earnest money back. I personally think, of course biased as the buyer, that we should be entitled to at least some of the earnest money (not entirely a drop in the bucket either). We would not have entered the contract if we had known about the flooding issue. Now, it will be hard to show that the seller had prior knowledge this would occur.
Just want opinions, it's really out of our hands at this point.




My wife and I were under contract on a 1 acre lot near Magnolia that we will be building a custom home on. After the storms last week, I decided we needed to check it out to see how drainage was. We found what is basically a wet weather stream flowing through the middle of the lot, 10-15 yards wide, 12"+ deep. See the pictures below to get an idea how bad it is. At that point, we decided that really is no way to build on the lot, and our home builder basically agreed. Now, we don't close until July 27th, so our builder/realtor started the process to terminate the contract. The contract did state that the property was sold 'as-is', but it also stated that the seller would notify us, the buyer, of any flooding. We do know that it sits entirely outside the 100 year floodplain, but that is not the issue at hand here. Though I am curious if the legal definition of flooding requires being within the floodplain. I should add, nothing on the property prior to the rains last week indicated that a wet weather creek would flow through the lot.
I am curious what everyone thinks about receiving our earnest money back. I personally think, of course biased as the buyer, that we should be entitled to at least some of the earnest money (not entirely a drop in the bucket either). We would not have entered the contract if we had known about the flooding issue. Now, it will be hard to show that the seller had prior knowledge this would occur.
Just want opinions, it's really out of our hands at this point.



