Can I deduct the cost of a lease on my business taxes?
quote:
You can write off your entire lifes expenses if you want to.
quote:
I did not watch it all, I shut it off as it was a blowout in the making. I heard about Bobbie’s “short” comment. I love that guy. Unfortunately, in today’s politically correct environment, he is a dying breed.
As to writing off the deer lease, in general…
For entertainment costs to be written off, a substantial business discussion must occur either before or after. Obviously, this is not a hard test to meet.
However, expenses related to entertainment facilities (the regs have examples as yachts, hunting lodges and swimming pools) are not deductable under any circumstances. A hunting lease falls under the facility rule so none of the annual lease costs can be written off.
What can be written off (subject to the 50% limitation on M&E expenses) are the costs incurred in entertaining the client. E.g. meals, gas to the lease if he rode with you etc.
As a quick example, if you were to take a client to your lease and you rode together, you could write off the gas, food and drinks consumed (yours and his), and any ammo etc. you furnished to him (50%). As you can see, the cost of providing this would exceed any tax savings you got from the write off. On the web site, one guy said his boss had a lease, took one client out there once a year and wrote the entire year’s cost off. This is an easy audit adjustment for the IRS. This is tax fraud and the guy should go to jail. If more *******s like him were sent to jail for the frauds they commit, the tax laws would not have to be so complex nor would the rest of us have to pay the price through higher taxes and complex compliance rules. This jerk has no concept of tax law and knows that what he is doing is wrong but hope’s he will not get audited. As you may have guessed, I have zero sympathy for people like him.
See:
Harrigan Lumber Co., Inc. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 17730-84., 88 TC --, No. 88, 88 TC 1562, Filed June 23, 1987
quote:
Actually, it's because of that rediculous tax code that he gets paid as much as he does.