So...I just unified Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

39,674 Views | 225 Replies | Last: 26 days ago by PeekingDuck
Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The word "day" is YOM. Which can mean 12 hours, 25 hours or a general period of time. Like how we can say back in the day. It doesn't mean we are referring to a singular 24 hour period but rather an arbitrary period.

But regardless how one interprets the Hebrew and this pertains to this discussion is TIME IS RELATIVE. The question is from whose perspective are the days being measured? If it's a universe day, with all the existing mass, it will tick slower than any sub body. So within a day of the universe the earth could experience millions of years. And I would argue we know for 100% certainty it's not earth's perspective because the sun and moon aren't created until the fourth "day".

Once more it seems to me the light originally created is like the maximum processing speed for our universe. And the split experiment works the way it does because reality is being rendered. And what we call reality is mostly empty space comprised of particles vibrating very fast to give the illusion of solid mass.
AgFrogfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Knights Liver said:

The amazing thing is this all started with a 42/moon app and lead directly to time travel. I'm glad to have helped fund the future.


Is that what happened here and why he hasn't posted? He solved time travel and is no longer in this timeline?

Came here to see if we solved scarcity yet and see he's been gone for a while now.
DE4D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bas d on the context of day's I always assumed old testament life was measured in lunar cycles not solar cycles.

Assuming the human body hasn't changed much
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

Honestly, at this point I can't tell if this is an elaborate larp by ChatGPT/Claude or what. It's definitely a bizarre feeling trying to become an expert on a theory that isn't really fleshed outeven to the point where you don't fully understand parts of it yourself.
hopefully by now you've given up on believing you and AI have cracked the higher mysteries.

There are many examples of AI sycophancy out there now. This thread is just another example.
permabull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hagen95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I played Win42 last week. Glad I'm supporting the higher sciences with my Shiner Bock infused gaming.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is this post about OP?



MIT researchers have mathematically proven that ChatGPT's built-in sycophancy creates a phenomenon they call "delusional spiraling."

You ask it something, it agrees. You ask again, and it agrees even harder until you end up believing things that are flat-out false and you can't tell it's happening.

The model is literally trained on human feedback that rewards agreement.

Real-world fallout includes one man who spent 300 hours convinced he invented a world-changing math formula, and a UCSF psychiatrist who hospitalized 12 patients for chatbot-linked psychosis in a single year.
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The crazy part is how eager other folks are to believe this thread was actually documenting new science augmented by ChatGPT.

If you want to be reminded of the dangers of AI, go re-watch the shake weight episode of South Park.

Commerical LLMs = South Park shake weight


CDub06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can't wait for the new ICD-10 code for AI related diagnoses.
Marsh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mega Lops said:

The crazy part is how eager other folks are to believe this thread was actually documenting new science augmented by ChatGPT.



Crazy in this day and age that there are still people who believe something they read on the internet.

I think I might be one of the few people who DID read a part of "his" work ( https://texags.com/forums/30/topics/3543197/replies/70350556 ). Riddled with cyclical equations. Lots of solving for "x" utilizing "Y" equation and then "proving" it by plugging "x" back into equation "Y". But hey, it was a "bombastic" finding that was going to change everything!

I can't believe I tried to reason with someone on the internet... Last time I'm ever doing that!
File5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hey, it's entertaining at worst and world changing at best- you got this Philip J. Fry!
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think most people on this thread who understand some physics were skeptical. I dont think the eagerness has anything to do with trust in AI, but people are generally eager for positive results related to things they are interested in.

I was rooting for Fry even when he irritably asked me "what I was getting at"
Hardworking, Unselfish, Fearless
permabull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

https://www.thehumanlineproject.org/media/support-group-launches-for-people-suffering-ai-psychosis
Cave Johnson, CEO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm getting strong Terrence Howard vibes here...


PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I read it and suggested some old contacts in the A&M physics dept, with some polite hesitance on breaking the concept of entropy.

In the words of George Box, "Since all models are wrong, the scientist must be alert to what is importantly wrong."

Better than most of what is posted on this site!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.