FF Ethics

2,822 Views | 45 Replies | Last: 23 days ago by Hill08
victory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thoughts on this move?

Team A vs Team B
Team A doesn't have a QB this week as his only rostered QB is on a Bye. Team A does not submit a WW claim for a QB. Tuesday morning Team B sees Team A doesn't have a QB yet for their matchup. There are only 9 TQB's on the WW. Team B spends $18 and picks up and immediately drops all remaining QB's making them not eligible for pickup until next weeks WW. Ultimately Team A will have to play this week, with winner advancing to the playoffs in a fairly big money league, with no quarterback.

chitty move on Team B?
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think it is bad league settings. A free agent picked up and dropped without a game being played or game week should be eligible to be added with no wavier wire
Drewmeister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bad bull, the commish should override and make those QBs available. It's one thing to stash a player so someone else can't have them but this is abusing the system.

Also, yes, bad league settings. In my Yahoo league all dropped players go on waiver for three days, so somebody could have them by Saturday. Not sure if players added and dropped before the game go on waivers or straight to free agency, but it would be the three-day waiver wire at worst, not next week!
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You gotta play the game!!! Genius move by Team B
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's fair game.

Team A needs to stay on top of their shlt.
Goldie Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fair play by Team B. Team A took a risk by only rostering one QB and not burning his WW. Tough ****
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
definitely bad settings by the commish, but a smart move by a guy trying to make the playoffs.
And what dummy only has one QB?

Whole situation sparks a random memory I had long forgotten of this super intense guy joining a league I was in one year and doing this exact thing with EVERY SKILL PLAYER IMAGINABLE on the waiver wire on Saturday night before the first Sunday of the season. He just add/dropped guys constantly for what must have been 2-3 hours to the point where there were no QBs / RBs / WRs/ TEs available when everyone else woke up Sunday morning. I'm pretty sure he got told to tone it down a little, but there's nothing like seeing the transaction counter with most people having 0 or 1, and some guy having 87.
Head Ninja In Charge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME.
mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For those of you saying fair game, that means any team could do this with every single player every single week so that no one could pick up any players except for the waiver wire. Just like what pork chop posted above. Thats not fair game. That's ridiculous. You can't say it's fair game in this situation but not fair game in other situations.

Agree it's bad settings but I would override at least some of the waiver wire qb pickups and drops.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's why it's important to get your waiver claims in on time and put in solid FAAB bids.

And to your same thinking how can you override some of the waiver wire pickups/drops. If you start messing with stuff you either override them all or none.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can you tell me who the players are on team B. Want to make sure his curse doesn't bring me down too.
hurleyag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have a maximum acquisition limit (can buy more if needed). that would prevent someone from doing it every week on all the skill players
LouisHerbertWong
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like you have a moran commissioner.

Seriously, how does a league get this deep into a season without this scenario being addressed/resolved?
Goldie Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wondering if OP is Team A, Team B, or commish.
mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

That's why it's important to get your waiver claims in on time and put in solid FAAB bids.

And to your same thinking how can you override some of the waiver wire pickups/drops. If you start messing with stuff you either override them all or none.


So in your mind if a player picked up and dropped every single FA every week right after the waivers ran so that no single team could ever pick up any player unless they did it with waivers, that would be okay? That's insane. Part of the strategy is deciding whether you use a waiver or wait to just pick up a player for free. It's not in the spirit of the rules to prevent people from picking up any players at all after waivers. People aren't even considering that that's a possibility when they decide not to use a waiver.

I'd be fine with overriding all of them.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We need to turn this into the Fantasy Football or Fantasy Sports horror / hilarious / amazing story thread.

As an old man I can tell you that if you auto drafted in the early days of ESPN, the system didn't know how to regulate positions. So once you got your starting lineup filled, it would just pick the best players available on its ranking. Therefore, one year, one of my friends picked his starters, then went offline.

The next day he got online to realize it had autodrafted the top 4 kickers in a row onto his bench.
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Like others have said, if the rules allow it, it's fair game. But this should definitely be resolved by your commish before next season.
victory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Goldie Wilson said:

Wondering if OP is Team A, Team B, or commish.
Oh, I'm Team B

This all could have been avoided by Team A had he just put in his WW claim OR picked up another QB before week 14. He did not submit a WW claim and left himself open to this possibility. To those saying what if everyone picked up and dropped every player.....well that's not possible if you put in a WW claim to fill your team needs. Also its $1 to add and $1 to drop so if you try to do that with position players that are not picked up on the WW, its going to get costly.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
victory said:

Goldie Wilson said:

Wondering if OP is Team A, Team B, or commish.
Oh, I'm Team B

This all could have been avoided by Team A had he just put in his WW claim OR picked up another QB before week 14. He did not submit a WW claim and left himself open to this possibility. To those saying what if everyone picked up and dropped every player.....well that's not possible if you put in a WW claim to fill your team needs. Also its $1 to add and $1 to drop so if you try to do that with position players, its going to get costly.
Never, ever, ever underestimate the lengths people will go to in order to succeed at fantasy sports.

There have been many, many weeks where I have given zero f*cks about my hometown Texans getting their asses beat because one or more of my FFL players are doing the damage.

mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
victory said:

Goldie Wilson said:

Wondering if OP is Team A, Team B, or commish.
Oh, I'm Team B

This all could have been avoided by Team A had he just put in his WW claim OR picked up another QB before week 14. He did not submit a WW claim and left himself open to this possibility. To those saying what if everyone picked up and dropped every player.....well that's not possible if you put in a WW claim to fill your team needs. Also its $1 to add and $1 to drop so if you try to do that with position players that are not picked up on the WW, its going to get costly.

Obviously what you did is not possible if Team A put in a WW claim. But there are many reasons to not want put in a WW claim (you want to move up in waivers, etc). And if you choose to not put in a WW claim you should not be prevented from picking up any players because someone picked up and dropped every single player that is available. The $1 to add/drop means nothing in a big money league. If that's how the teams were going to handle this rule in this league, I'd definitely be out of the league the next year, especially if it's a big money league (I'd be out even if the rule changed). Allowing this would effectively do away with any ability for any team to pick up a player other than off of waivers. If that's the case, just do away with free agents all together and make it to where you can only use waivers to pick up players. That would be much better.

I play in a relatively big money league. We have rules that don't allow what Team B did (and I agree the lack of rules is the main problem in this case), but no one would resort to doing what Team B did even if we didn't have the rule where a player becomes available again. Mainly because we all love the league and are friends and would not want to risk doing something to game the system and then getting kicked out.
Goldie Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mavsfan4ever said:

victory said:

Goldie Wilson said:

Wondering if OP is Team A, Team B, or commish.
Oh, I'm Team B

This all could have been avoided by Team A had he just put in his WW claim OR picked up another QB before week 14. He did not submit a WW claim and left himself open to this possibility. To those saying what if everyone picked up and dropped every player.....well that's not possible if you put in a WW claim to fill your team needs. Also its $1 to add and $1 to drop so if you try to do that with position players that are not picked up on the WW, its going to get costly.

Obviously what you did is not possible if Team A put in a WW claim. But there are many reasons to not want put in a WW claim (you want to move up in waivers, etc). And if you choose to not put in a WW claim you should not be prevented from picking up any players because someone picked up and dropped every single player that is available. The $1 to add/drop means nothing in a big money league. If that's how the teams were going to handle this rule in this league, I'd definitely be out of the league the next year, especially if it's a big money league (I'd be out even if the rule changed). Allowing this would effectively do away with any ability for any team to pick up a player other than off of waivers. If that's the case, just do away with free agents all together and make it to where you can only use waivers to pick up players. That would be much better.

I play in a relatively big money league. We have rules that don't allow what Team B did (and I agree the lack of rules is the main problem in this case), but no one would resort to doing what Team B did even if we didn't have the rule where a player becomes available again. Mainly because we all love the league and are friends and would not want to risk doing something to game the system and then getting kicked out.
Team A ran the risk of not picking up a QB during WW (which, as you said, there can be strategic reasons for doing so). If you choose not put in a WW claim, then this is the risk you run. You don't get to have it both ways.
mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The risk is that you don't get the player you wanted bc someone else picks them up during waivers or before you pick them up after waivers. The risk is not that someone picks up and immediately drops every player for the sole reason of preventing anyone from picking up those players.
victory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mavsfan4ever said:

victory said:

Goldie Wilson said:

Wondering if OP is Team A, Team B, or commish.
Oh, I'm Team B

This all could have been avoided by Team A had he just put in his WW claim OR picked up another QB before week 14. He did not submit a WW claim and left himself open to this possibility. To those saying what if everyone picked up and dropped every player.....well that's not possible if you put in a WW claim to fill your team needs. Also its $1 to add and $1 to drop so if you try to do that with position players that are not picked up on the WW, its going to get costly.

Obviously what you did is not possible if Team A put in a WW claim. But there are many reasons to not want put in a WW claim (you want to move up in waivers, etc). And if you choose to not put in a WW claim you should not be prevented from picking up any players because someone picked up and dropped every single player that is available. The $1 to add/drop means nothing in a big money league. If that's how the teams were going to handle this rule in this league, I'd definitely be out of the league the next year, especially if it's a big money league (I'd be out even if the rule changed). Allowing this would effectively do away with any ability for any team to pick up a player other than off of waivers. If that's the case, just do away with free agents all together and make it to where you can only use waivers to pick up players. That would be much better.

I play in a relatively big money league. We have rules that don't allow what Team B did (and I agree the lack of rules is the main problem in this case), but no one would resort to doing what Team B did even if we didn't have the rule where a player becomes available again. Mainly because we all love the league and are friends and would not want to risk doing something to game the system and then getting kicked out.


Not that the reasoning matters but Team A has since admitted that it was not strategic and he forgot to put in a WW claim leaving himself open to being "sabotaged". The same conversation on this thread is the same occurring in our group text. This is 12 team $500 buy in and another almost $1500 in transaction fees to date and yes we are all friends and it's a pretty cutthroat league, so I have zero guilt about pulling this move.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What's the tone of the opinions on the group thread of what you did?
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
victory said:

Goldie Wilson said:

Wondering if OP is Team A, Team B, or commish.
Oh, I'm Team B
Hell yeah
Hey...so.. um
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm okay with it since the rules allow it, but our league puts players kept more than a day on waivers for 3 days and players who are picked up and dropped in the same day, don't go on waivers. They are available to picked up again.

Yalls rules suck.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So if team A gets eliminated are they allowed to drop all their players if the league settings allow it?
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's a ****ty move, but I think FF is supposed to be fun, not cutthroat, so I definitely think you don't need to be a jackass to a friend/family.
victory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

What's the tone of the opinions on the group thread of what you did?
Team A is bothered, but understands he left himself open to this possibility. One other in the league doesn't agree with it. The other 9 in the league are like....its your own damn fault.
victory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texagbeliever said:

So if team A gets eliminated are they allowed to drop all their players if the league settings allow it?
once you are eliminated, your roster is locked.
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MooreTrucker said:

I think it's a ****ty move, but I think FF is supposed to be fun, not cutthroat, so I definitely think you don't need to be a jackass to a friend/family.

If you think FF is fun, I think you're doing it wrong..
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
boy09 said:

MooreTrucker said:

I think it's a ****ty move, but I think FF is supposed to be fun, not cutthroat, so I definitely think you don't need to be a jackass to a friend/family.

If you think FF is fun, I think you're doing it wrong..
Oh, so you're one of those......
victory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MooreTrucker said:

boy09 said:

MooreTrucker said:

I think it's a ****ty move, but I think FF is supposed to be fun, not cutthroat, so I definitely think you don't need to be a jackass to a friend/family.

If you think FF is fun, I think you're doing it wrong..
Oh, so you're one of those......
winning is FUN! Especially when money is involved.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
victory said:

MooreTrucker said:

boy09 said:

MooreTrucker said:

I think it's a ****ty move, but I think FF is supposed to be fun, not cutthroat, so I definitely think you don't need to be a jackass to a friend/family.

If you think FF is fun, I think you're doing it wrong..
Oh, so you're one of those......
winning is FUN! Especially when money is involved.
Username checks out
ac04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
depends on the league. big money league with strangers and this is brilliant IMO. free league with coworkers and its not something i'd ever consider doing.

commish needs to get his **** together before next season, really bad rule.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.