***** Official Super Bowl Thread *****

49,326 Views | 644 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by W
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Purdy started 6 of 7 for around 100 yards

but then went 17 of 31 for 150 yards the rest of the way

10 of his 23 completions went to RB's
Jack Ruby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is that 3 straight SB losses for the 49ers?
TexAgs1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
**** the Chiefs.

**** Brittany Mahomes.

**** Travis Kelce.

**** Jackson Mahomes.

**** Chiefs fans
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scotty Appleton said:

Aston04 said:

I already edited the post.

No explanation what the hell is going on with the ot rules.. like that it would have been treated like end of a quarter.. not end of ot 1.




Actually that is exactly what they said right before the final play. 'It is just like the end of the 1st quarter…'
They should have done better explaining, and earlier…
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Going to watch " All Creatures Great and Small" on PBS. More realistic and worthy.
JABQ04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To be perfectly fair the MVP was going to be Kelce or Mahones. Basically you had a 50/50 chance
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scotty Appleton said:

Aston04 said:

I already edited the post.

No explanation what the hell is going on with the ot rules.. like that it would have been treated like end of a quarter.. not end of ot 1.




Actually that is exactly what they said right before the final play. 'It is just like the end of the 1st quarter…'
didn't catch it.

We were rooting for the chiefs and freaking out with the clock running and the TV broadcast just showing the replay from the previous play.. like what the f.. call timeout..

It was ah&tty production.
Scotty Appleton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiephoenix02 said:

Scotty Appleton said:

Aston04 said:

I already edited the post.

No explanation what the hell is going on with the ot rules.. like that it would have been treated like end of a quarter.. not end of ot 1.




Actually that is exactly what they said right before the final play. 'It is just like the end of the 1st quarter…'
They should have done better explaining, and earlier…


Sure. Maybe they could have called a TV timeout to explain it instead of the Chiefs keeping their momentum
Sparkie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

Purdy started 6 of 7 for around 100 yards

but then went 17 of 31 for 150 yards the rest of the way

10 of his 23 completions went to RB's
To me, SF stopped running the ball, panicked and stuck with the passing game. But, i don't know squat.
He is Ass My Dude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So what's the explanation? What the hell was Romo talking about?
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scotty Appleton said:

aggiephoenix02 said:

Scotty Appleton said:

Aston04 said:

I already edited the post.

No explanation what the hell is going on with the ot rules.. like that it would have been treated like end of a quarter.. not end of ot 1.




Actually that is exactly what they said right before the final play. 'It is just like the end of the 1st quarter…'
They should have done better explaining, and earlier…


Sure. Maybe they could have called a TV timeout to explain it instead of the Chiefs keeping their momentum
College football announcers and commentators ALWAYS explain the overtime rules (with graphics), every single game there is an overtime. This wasn't anywhere close to that…
Sparkie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scotty Appleton said:

aggiephoenix02 said:

Scotty Appleton said:

Aston04 said:

I already edited the post.

No explanation what the hell is going on with the ot rules.. like that it would have been treated like end of a quarter.. not end of ot 1.




Actually that is exactly what they said right before the final play. 'It is just like the end of the 1st quarter…'
They should have done better explaining, and earlier…


Sure. Maybe they could have called a TV timeout to explain it instead of the Chiefs keeping their momentum
Sorta like sitting down on the field with a pinky injury.
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just like they messed up the start of the ot. They should have explained the playoff overtime rules before we heard from the ref before the coin toss. Again confusing to the average viewer -- I forgot about them changing playoff ot rules.. confusing..

They tried explaining after.... And even then didn't understand the strategic advantage of getting the ball first to explain to the audience... Basically caught with their pants down for ot
Texker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Suck it California.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there a rule that when you print your own money that you're required to have a terrible haircut?
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Goose83 said:

Sparkie said:

Goose83 said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

RRRIIIGGGGGGGEEEEDDDDDDDDD!
Only one penalty on KC after the second quarter.

No wonder these guys are unbeatable.

It's not like they aren't committing them.
There was a key play on that final drive where the KC offensive lineman had his hands up in the face of the defender, which would be a penalty on everyone else.

But at least the NFL gets their bogus narrative of the Chiefs as the new Patriots.

I really don't understand why the nfl would want kc to win if they were pulling all these strings? Wouldn't they, by default, slant to larger markets. These nfl is rigged posts just don't make sense.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texker said:

Suck it California.
This is such a great point…
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Refugees in Gaza get 49ers Champs gear.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
94chem said:

Is there a rule that when you print your own money that you're required to have a terrible haircut?
It's a perk…
NorCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Better team lost. Better coached team won. Andy Reid is a great man and an even better coach. John Lynch and Kyle Shanahan made their bed letting Robbie Gould leave and drafting a kicker with a 3rd round pick. As amazing as they have been managing their roster in light of the failed Trey Lance draft pick, that decision cost them a Super Bowl.

Even so, if the Niners still had Demeco, they win the game. Period.
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
He is Ass My Dude said:

So what's the explanation? What the hell was Romo talking about?
He was "pretending" to be knowledgeable.
If you think I am a liberal, you are incorrect. Assume sarcasm on my part. Sorry if something I post has already been posted.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Refugees in Gaza get 49ers Champs gear.
Soon to be seen in San Antonio…
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He is Ass My Dude said:

So what's the explanation? What the hell was Romo talking about?

The explanation was it was just like changing quarters (had the clock run out). The second team had a chance to score, regardless of if time run out. They would have just taken a media timeout, changed ends of the field, and they still would have had the ball.
NorCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texker said:

Suck it California.

Texas Forever!
SeanDaAg2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So if time had ticked off the clock there, they would've started a new quarter? The more you know… I was losing my mind thinking Andy Reid was going for a new low in time management
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiephoenix02 said:

94chem said:

Is there a rule that when you print your own money that you're required to have a terrible haircut?
It's a perk…


That Al Davis kid is a dead ringer for Ralph Wiggum. I could just stare at him like a Warhol.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SeanDaAg2005 said:

So if time had ticked off the clock there, they would've started a new quarter? The more you know… I was losing my mind thinking Andy Reid was going for a new low in time management


Numerous on this thread confused... Yes...most watching prob had no clue wtf was going on... That goes back on Romo and Jim and the production crew not getting it done.
jonb02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jonb02 said:

I got Chiefs by 3.

Watching at home with my dog Booger, a husky.

Thinking about an old fashioned. Ready for some foosball.


Nailed it!
gigem1223
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great. Now we get to hear all the "lifelong" KC fans all offseason. So annoying
jonb02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lifelong fan here.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SeanDaAg2005 said:

So if time had ticked off the clock there, they would've started a new quarter? The more you know… I was losing my mind thinking Andy Reid was going for a new low in time management


Yeah, I had no idea that people didn't understand overtime rules. Sure, I explained it to my wife, but I figured actual football fans would know. I don't think it occurred to Romo or Nantz to explain that the quarter clock meant nothing except a direction switch.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aston04 said:

SeanDaAg2005 said:

So if time had ticked off the clock there, they would've started a new quarter? The more you know… I was losing my mind thinking Andy Reid was going for a new low in time management
Numerous on this thread confused... Yes...most watching prob had no clue wtf was going on... That goes back on Romo and Jim and the production crew not getting it done.

Their reaction threw people off.

It wasn't clear especially when they change the OT rules.
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shanaham has pissed away 10+ leads in three separate Super bowls

Modern Day Marv
Texker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiephoenix02 said:

Texker said:

Suck it California.
This is such a great point…
It might be my best post ever.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.