Opponent wants Stefon Diggs (I also have CeeDee, Pickens, and London)

WR options to get in return - DK, Pittman, Kupp, CKirk, and Nico

My thinking is that my other 3 aren't good enough to justify losing Diggs even with what I could get in return.

Thoughts?

Surely not 1:1 swap?

Anyways, Diggs and Ceedee are studs. Keep your studs, no reason to spread it around between a few "good" players when you already have 2 great WRs

Thanks. That's pretty much what I decided. I'll have a nail-biter this week with players on bye, but I'm in the #1 seed right now, so not a giant worry and I'll have those studs in the playoffs.

MooreTrucker said:

---

Opponent wants Stefon Diggs (I also have CeeDee, Pickens, and London)

WR options to get in return - DK, Pittman, Kupp, CKirk, and Nico

My thinking is that my other 3 aren't good enough to justify losing Diggs even with what I could get in return.

Thoughts?

---

I also have Diggs on my team and though his production hasn't always been the best he's on a team that is trying to get into the playoffs with a QB who can get him the ball. If I'm in your position I wouldn't trade him for anyone on the other teams because Diggs is a true WR1 and every week has the potential to put up points. DK's getting the ball from Geno Smith, Pittman and Kupp are past their prime, Kirk is WR2 for Jacksonville, and Stroud spreads the ball around too much to give up Diggs for Nico.

Thanks!

You take the trade?

Edit: Re read, sounds like you didn't, some guys on that list blew up this week.

Jason Ag said:

---

You take the trade?

Edit: Re read, sounds like you didn't, some guys on that list blew up this week.

---

I did not take the trade, but I'm just an even mediocre performance from Trevor Lawrence from winning and remaining in the #1 spot. And the person who requested the trade is probable to score the league-high points this week.

So it works out.