I like Mayer but don't worry the Texans taking a TE at some point in the 3/4 rounds is as sure a bet as Dubon getting a hit in a game this season for the Astros
Love when people talk $h!t and then vehemently deny it. "I WOULD NEVER!!!" (clutching pearls)Lake08 said:Harry Dunne said:Says the guy who told me Levis was going #1 overall.Lake08 said:
So instead of trading down and upgrading your roster, you now give up a ton. And btw, look who still is on the board. Idiots, just idiots
Huh? Show me where I EVER said that
I agree 100% with this approach. You have numerous picks and should use them to take BPA available until you at least have a solid team. Then you go for the "all in" trades.Ranger222 said:
And I get it. It certainly is a statement for a fanbase that has been miserable the past three years. These are two potential franchise cornerstone players on either side of the ball that should bring fans back and keep excitement up for the next couple years.
It just contradicts my version of preferred team building -- accumulate a warchest of draft capital (especially day 1 and 2 picks) and get as many rolls of the dice as possible. Texans were set up for that - and risked it. It may pay off, may not. I think the franchise just risked putting it all on red/black which is not my preferred method of building a team. It would not have been as exciting or generated the same amount of buzz (which are also factors into this equation), but I would have preferred the slow build (and nothing says that strategy would have worked in the end either).
Stingley, Kenyon, Metchie, Pitre, Harris, Pierce, etc. There was a huge investment in last year's class and enough flash to be optimistic about it.W said:
speaking of Stingley...
he and Kenyon are still big pieces of the turnaound.
the coaching staff needs to make them into major contributors
Ags #1 said:
We sent the browns first or the texans first
its usually week 2 or 3Quote:
'm assuming Stroud will be starting Week 1 right? IMO you don't draft a guy #2 and not start him.
Reno Hightower said:
Has there ever been good buckeye NFL qb?
Reno Hightower said:
Has there ever been good buckeye NFL qb?
True and I think Stingley puts it all together this season. If you were going to go with Lovie and his Cover 2 scheme long term, then Stingley was the wrong CB to pick. I still think he'll be a Pro Bowler for many years.Ag_07 said:
That's one thing I have really high hopes for...Demeco using Stingley correctly and getting the most out of him.
Ags #1 said:
kind of like kyler being an a&m qb Realitly is fields is the best they have put out and he got most of his yards running the ball. Doesnt mean stroud cant be the next josh allen or lamar. The osu qb track record isnt good but that doesnt mean stroud cant be a top 10 qb
There also wasn't a history of tech QBs going in the first after putting up video game stats and sucking it up. That system plus the skill position talent brings up a valid question of whether their QBs are real. I personally think Stroud is a better prospect than any of the recent QBs there but I also think his stats are inflated.Ag_07 said:Reno Hightower said:
Has there ever been good buckeye NFL qb?
I keep seeing this brought up. What does this matter?
Had there ever been a good Tech QB pre-Mahomes? What about a good Wyoming QB pre-Allen? Or a good LSU QB pre-Burrow?
Hell Burrow was a tOSU QB.