***Cowboys vs Jags ***

12,567 Views | 301 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by EastSideAg2002
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everything has changed. It counts as 2 losses if you don't establish the run.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not gonna bich too much about the run. There have been far fewer wtf gameplans in 2022 because they learned to lean on it. Did have some wtf moments late, but overall, I can live with it. It keeps putting up 28+ every week and numerous times 40+ since Dak got back; that's #1 in the league level production by a wide margin. But this defense has spring some major leaks and a bad run D likely just got worse with the LVE injury
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jr15aggie said:

Macarthur said:

It seems to me there are stretches where they get too run heavy. I know you have a lead and want to kill clock but just too many runs on 1st and 2nd down and now Dak has to almost be perfect on 3rd and 6, or so.

I don't remember one of the bootlegs w a TE option. They use that so much. Where was that?


They used it once today and it worked well.

Would have been a perfect call on 1st down to ice the game. Instead we ran a draw to Zeke and lost 3 yards.
41 runs for 154 yards is not really good.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By comparison, Jax ran 27 for 192. Much better.
dave94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hungry Ojos said:

I honestly would trade the ENTIRE Detroit organization for Dallas' straight up right now. Owners, players, coaches, everything. This effing franchise as it stands cannot effing win. They just can't effing win.


Haha, okay. Take the rest of the day off
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Macarthur said:

jr15aggie said:

Macarthur said:

It seems to me there are stretches where they get too run heavy. I know you have a lead and want to kill clock but just too many runs on 1st and 2nd down and now Dak has to almost be perfect on 3rd and 6, or so.

I don't remember one of the bootlegs w a TE option. They use that so much. Where was that?


They used it once today and it worked well.

Would have been a perfect call on 1st down to ice the game. Instead we ran a draw to Zeke and lost 3 yards.
41 runs for 154 yards is not really good.


The Bears would take that against the Chiefs, but yeah, the Dallas O shouldn't be trying to pour wet concrete on the game.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Go back on that last play that got Jax in FG range to end the game. I don't know how D. Wilson missed at least tipping that ball. Amazing how something like literally a fingernail turns that game.
12thMan9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We won't win w/Dak as QB. Yes, he took us 98 yds. against the WORST team in the league. But he doesn't have "it". This is bad loss #2 under his leadership this season.

He's a black Tony Romo.
Ronnie '88
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dak was 17 for 20 at one point. He went 3 for 10 to finish the game.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
12thMan9 said:

We won't win w/Dak as QB. Yes, he took us 98 yds. against the WORST team in the league. But he doesn't have "it". This is bad loss #2 under his leadership this season.

He's a black Tony Romo.


I honestly had more faith in Romo than I do Dak. Dak is a good player but there is just something off about him that doesn't give me a lot of confidence. Maybe it's the lack of consistency.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We've all heard the rumors that him and Zeke are both… funny, iykwim…
dave94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12thMan9 said:

We won't win w/Dak as QB. Yes, he took us 98 yds. against the WORST team in the league. But he doesn't have "it". This is bad loss #2 under his leadership this season.

He's a black Tony Romo.


That's ridiculous. This game was lost by the defense.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12thMan9 said:

We won't win w/Dak as QB. Yes, he took us 98 yds. against the WORST team in the league. But he doesn't have "it". This is bad loss #2 under his leadership this season.

He's a black Tony Romo.
I am not surprised you are also someone that didnt think Romo was good enough, lol.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As long as Jerry Jones is in charge, it doesn't matter who the QB or coach or players are, they aren't gonna win another one again
Ag12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hungry Ojos said:

I honestly would trade the ENTIRE Detroit organization for Dallas' straight up right now. Owners, players, coaches, everything. This effing franchise as it stands cannot effing win. They just can't effing win.
Actually, just give us Dan Campbell, please. Those dudes are tough as nails, just like their head coach.
LeonardSkinner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe the Cowboys can point at an unlucky bounce to give the defense a walkoff touchdown.

At least they're not the Patriots receiver who literally threw the ball to the Raiders defensive lineman for the game winning score.
Southlake
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really thought the Bears were going to upset the iggles and next weeks game would be epic.

Why I don't gamble
Orlando Ayala Cant Read
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

12thMan9 said:

We won't win w/Dak as QB. Yes, he took us 98 yds. against the WORST team in the league. But he doesn't have "it". This is bad loss #2 under his leadership this season.

He's a black Tony Romo.


I honestly had more faith in Romo than I do Dak. Dak is a good player but there is just something off about him that doesn't give me a lot of confidence. Maybe it's the lack of consistency.


Same here. I'd have more faith in Romo w this team but I'm also I'm the Romo was underrated camp as well so maybe not that objective
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Been thinking about that 3rd down when they threw the ball and allowed Jax to keep that last TO.

The frustrating part to me is McCarthy hides behind analytics when you go ultra conservative on 1st and 2nd down. To me, i don't give a S what the analytics says, that's dumb football.

If you want to get the first down and end the game, don't run right into the back of your OL two plays in a row. The first two plays then ask your QB to convert a 3rd and 12.

Yuck!
gigem1223
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep. And the worst part is they threw a hope and a prayer. At the very least throw a crossing route or something short of the sticks to at least keep the clock running.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gigem1223 said:

Yep. And the worst part is they threw a hope and a prayer. At the very least throw a crossing route or something short of the sticks to at least keep the clock running.
nd

And I don't blame Dak. Go back and watch it. They went max protect w 3 guys in the route. CD literally had 3 guys covering him. Poor play design and didn't even really give your QB a chance.

You can't go ultra conservative first two downs and then ask your QB to bail you out like that! Crazy.


Having said that, the D is very worrisome.
EastSideAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Macarthur said:

gigem1223 said:

Yep. And the worst part is they threw a hope and a prayer. At the very least throw a crossing route or something short of the sticks to at least keep the clock running.
nd

And I don't blame Dak. Go back and watch it. They went max protect w 3 guys in the route. CD literally had 3 guys covering him. Poor play design and didn't even really give your QB a chance.

You can't go ultra conservative first two downs and then ask your QB to bail you out like that! Crazy.


Having said that, the D is very worrisome.
Anthony Brown was no world beater but hes not trash like the next two in line.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.