When do all those draft picks start rolling in?
Matsui said:
No ***** No one was trading for that contract.
It's your only chance to guarantee you get him.DannyDuberstein said:
Why pay with trade value when there is a 100% chance that he's going to be dumped?
mm98 said:
Corleone99 with ****ty info as usual.
AgGrad99 said:
Isnt' getting something in return for him better than outright releasing him?
This is what I admit 100% that I don't understand....would seem "reasonable" that if we traded him we should wipe his impact from our salary cap completely...???hph6203 said:
Pretty sure the salary cap implications are the same whether they trade or cut him (5 million cap savings), unless they designate him a June 1 cut at which point they save additional cap space this year, but there would be dead money next year. Given that the Cowboys aren't expected to be major players in free agency, and haven't been for several years, the dead money next year may be more prohibitive than taking the entire remaining cap hit this year. Especially if you can alternatively get a mid round pick that escalates to a 2nd rounder for Romo.
That would normally be the case, however, the Cowboys have restructured so much of Romo's contract that a ton of his guaranteed money has been pushed back. The Cowboys still owe Romo that portion of his guaranteed money he hasn't received. Once he's traded, all that money gets accelerated and is due immediately. If we release him, I believe it can be spread out over a few years.planoaggie123 said:This is what I admit 100% that I don't understand....would seem "reasonable" that if we traded him we should wipe his impact from our salary cap completely...???hph6203 said:
Pretty sure the salary cap implications are the same whether they trade or cut him (5 million cap savings), unless they designate him a June 1 cut at which point they save additional cap space this year, but there would be dead money next year. Given that the Cowboys aren't expected to be major players in free agency, and haven't been for several years, the dead money next year may be more prohibitive than taking the entire remaining cap hit this year. Especially if you can alternatively get a mid round pick that escalates to a 2nd rounder for Romo.
hph6203 said:
Pretty sure the salary cap implications are the same whether they trade or cut him (5 million cap savings), unless they designate him a June 1 cut at which point they save additional cap space this year, but there would be dead money next year. Given that the Cowboys aren't expected to be major players in free agency, and haven't been for several years, the dead money next year may be more prohibitive than taking the entire remaining cap hit this year. Especially if you can alternatively get a mid round pick that escalates to a 2nd rounder for Romo.
Matsui said:
No ***** No one was trading for that contract.
LincolnBorglum79 said:
Den and hou won't be interested any more after the draft.
Better hurry or he will have no place to go
mm98 said:
Corleone99 ahead of the game per usual.