Wanted to get some input to try and make sense of this in my head with regard to a situation with my wife's employer.
She accepted her job a few years ago at a salary of "X" plus performance bonus based on company and personal performance. This is a company(public accounting) that certain times of the year mandates significant overtime and routinely fires people for not meeting the required hours. In addition, the partners seem to be extremely cold and uncaring towards employees in general most recently evidenced by firing a person the day before their wedding, and another one a couple days before Christmas. Not for some heinous act by the employees either, just "didn't work out" kinda thing.
Last year, the company announced that they were slightly bumping everyone's salary and doing away with any bonuses going forward.
Due to a change in our family dynamics, my wife recently requested to only be required to adhere to a 40hr week. Her firm said "that's fine but we're deducting the raise you got last year since you won't be working OT and there is still no bonus".
I'm not sure how to articulate it exactly but something about this doesn't sit right with me. I also am in a very different industry(commercial construction) so I don't know if this type of thing is typical in the accounting world.
Just seems to me that a "salary" would typically include OT and that bonuses would be based on firm profits as well as going "above and beyond". I don't see the incentive in doing more than the minimum required if you know there is no potential for additional reward. She is currently 1 level below "Partner" and has no desire for that promotion due to the 25 year commitment they require their partners to make. She is a licensed CPA with 12 years of public accounting under her belt.
Curious as to yalls opinions.
She accepted her job a few years ago at a salary of "X" plus performance bonus based on company and personal performance. This is a company(public accounting) that certain times of the year mandates significant overtime and routinely fires people for not meeting the required hours. In addition, the partners seem to be extremely cold and uncaring towards employees in general most recently evidenced by firing a person the day before their wedding, and another one a couple days before Christmas. Not for some heinous act by the employees either, just "didn't work out" kinda thing.
Last year, the company announced that they were slightly bumping everyone's salary and doing away with any bonuses going forward.
Due to a change in our family dynamics, my wife recently requested to only be required to adhere to a 40hr week. Her firm said "that's fine but we're deducting the raise you got last year since you won't be working OT and there is still no bonus".
I'm not sure how to articulate it exactly but something about this doesn't sit right with me. I also am in a very different industry(commercial construction) so I don't know if this type of thing is typical in the accounting world.
Just seems to me that a "salary" would typically include OT and that bonuses would be based on firm profits as well as going "above and beyond". I don't see the incentive in doing more than the minimum required if you know there is no potential for additional reward. She is currently 1 level below "Partner" and has no desire for that promotion due to the 25 year commitment they require their partners to make. She is a licensed CPA with 12 years of public accounting under her belt.
Curious as to yalls opinions.