AggieDruggist89 said:
Thanks,
I just remember my daughter's struggles applying to University of Californias and USC( legacy) 6years ago and law school 2 years ago where many URM (Under represented minorities) were getting accepted to top law schools with much lower GPA and LSAT. She is graduating next year from an Ivy law school so she fought through the system fine.
U of CA has now made SAT obsolete and made adversity score as the replacement merit. So my hard work to ensure my kids academic success has actually backfired in a way. And that's how UC countered the affirmative action ban.
So, top 20 schools are reach, top 50 with merit based scholarships are target and the full ride schools will be the safety net for my son.
That's horrific, I didn't know that. I know that California overturned reverse discrimination years ago, my recollection was that they did it via a statewide referendum. I guess this is how they do an end-around. Keep me (us) posted as to what your son eventually does.
Edit: Great article hot off the press from WSJ, confirming what I've said before about how discrimination will prevail until lawsuits against these schools are successful:
Can Harvard use Application Essays to Discriminate by Race?A few snippets in case still behind paywall:
"Meanwhile, Harvard, UNC's co-litigant, has looked for ways to keep discriminating, and so have many other institutions. They focus on one sentence of the court's ruling: "Nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Harvard responded to the decision by
citing this line in isolation, suggesting it would treat it as a loophole. The university said it would comply with the law but reaffirmed its commitment to diversity, commenting, "we will determine how to preserve, consistent with the Court's new precedent, our essential values."
Harvard has made a formerly optional prompt a requirement for all applicants: "Harvard has long recognized the importance of enrolling a diverse student body. How will the life experiences that shape who you are today enable you to contribute to Harvard?"
Rice is fishing for the race of applicants with a new optional essay prompt, which asks, "What perspectives shaped by your background, experiences, upbringing, and/or racial identity inspire you to join our community of change agents at Rice?"
It looks as if many colleges and universities will need to be told again, and they will deserve the litigation required to tell them."
The last sentence pretty much says it all.
And in the comments section, to your point:
"The UC system has been working around affirmative action since 1996 by carefully reading the applicants essays and determining admissions. Where there's a will, there's a way."
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full
Medical Disclaimer.