"God is transgender"; "Mary assigned Jesus male at birth" - utterly rage inducing

5,483 Views | 66 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by TexAgs91
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boogie2988Ag said:

BrazosDog02 said:

Ugh...God is genderless. I thought that was pretty well understood. He is not a he, not a trans, not LGBTQ...if anything, it's an it. Jesus was a dude, but his daddy ain't.

John 4:24 something something spirit and whatever pesky Bible stuff it says.

Why do liberals quote something from the Bible as truth when they always say it's full of nonsense?"


I dunno. Because they are human, I suppose. Folks tend to use data to the extent it's convenient or handy for them and toss it when it's not.
jtkk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kashchei said:

I bet James Talarico agrees

If you have been following the Paxton vs. Six Gender Jimmy thread there are a few on there that also agree.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a heretic and demonic episcopal priestess. God is masculine because Jesus refered to Him as Father.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reopen the mental institutions.
Featured Video Previews
Boogie2988Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

"Father" does not have "being male" as a prerequisite. We cannot be that obtuse.

bwahahhahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahahahahah
Boogie2988Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrazosDog02 said:

Boogie2988Ag said:

BrazosDog02 said:

Ugh...God is genderless. I thought that was pretty well understood. He is not a he, not a trans, not LGBTQ...if anything, it's an it. Jesus was a dude, but his daddy ain't.

John 4:24 something something spirit and whatever pesky Bible stuff it says.

Why do liberals quote something from the Bible as truth when they always say it's full of nonsense?"


I dunno. Because they are human, I suppose. Folks tend to use data to the extent it's convenient or handy for them and toss it when it's not.

Thanks for confirming the hypocrisy of yours and the lefts use of the bible.
Luigi Vampa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BrazosDog02 said:

BigRobSA said:

BrazosDog02 said:

Ugh...God is genderless. I thought that was pretty well understood. He is not a he, not a trans, not LGBTQ...if anything, it's an it. Jesus was a dude, but his daddy ain't.

John 4:24 something something spirit and whatever pesky Bible stuff it says.

Even Jesus, the guy who knew HIM best, called him "Father".

The Church also hangs up a white, blue eyed, blonde haired dude in the front wall as a representation of a middle eastern carpenter.


This is such a tired and lazy take. I've been in hundreds of churches (specifically carholic) and still never seen the blonde hair blue eye version of jesus that very liberal tells us we belive in.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That gay pastor is one of satans minions.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BrazosDog02 said:

Ugh...God is genderless. I thought that was pretty well understood. He is not a he, not a trans, not LGBTQ...if anything, it's an it. Jesus was a dude, but his daddy ain't.

John 4:24 something something spirit and whatever pesky Bible stuff it says.
"But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you." - John 14:26

The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are all male gender. Jesus's words, not mine.

You yourself called him Jesus's daddy. Seems like you're trolling .




samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrazosDog02 said:

BigRobSA said:

BrazosDog02 said:

Ugh...God is genderless. I thought that was pretty well understood. He is not a he, not a trans, not LGBTQ...if anything, it's an it. Jesus was a dude, but his daddy ain't.

John 4:24 something something spirit and whatever pesky Bible stuff it says.

Even Jesus, the guy who knew HIM best, called him "Father".

The Church also hangs up a white, blue eyed, blonde haired dude in the front wall as a representation of a middle eastern carpenter.

Literary and artistic liberties have been taken after 465,000 translations of a text by imperfect scribes to get us where we are today.

I guess there are words to describe modern religion and the bible but 'consistent' is definitely not one of them.

The old testament matches the Dead Sea Scrolls, they where unearthed in 1946.....and it matched the books we had. The accuracy was amazing, over a thousand years!

Your comment about translations is faulty when it comes to the Torah and other books in the OT. Also the NT books are generally traced back to only two versions, Alexandrian and Byzantine.

instead of trying to make a faulty point about mistranslations you are welcome to peruse the oldest works and translations. We also have well documented vocabularies for Ancient Greek, Ancient Hebrew, and Aramaic.


In other words, many of the books we have in the OT especially are EXACT MATCHES to books unearthed and dated to be even as early as 200-400 BC. Yes many woke loonies like the person in the OP distort the words, but you can read the actual oldest translations yourself.

deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BrazosDog02 said:

Ugh...God is genderless. I thought that was pretty well understood. He is not a he, not a trans, not LGBTQ...if anything, it's an it. Jesus was a dude, but his daddy ain't.

John 4:24 something something spirit and whatever pesky Bible stuff it says.

It is "pretty well understood" only by the people who use selected biblical passages for their political uses. Like Talarico and his "christian" supporters.

Their true god is Party, not Jesus.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

BrazosDog02 said:

BigRobSA said:

BrazosDog02 said:

Ugh...God is genderless. I thought that was pretty well understood. He is not a he, not a trans, not LGBTQ...if anything, it's an it. Jesus was a dude, but his daddy ain't.

John 4:24 something something spirit and whatever pesky Bible stuff it says.

Even Jesus, the guy who knew HIM best, called him "Father".

The Church also hangs up a white, blue eyed, blonde haired dude in the front wall as a representation of a middle eastern carpenter.

Literary and artistic liberties have been taken after 465,000 translations of a text by imperfect scribes to get us where we are today.

I guess there are words to describe modern religion and the bible but 'consistent' is definitely not one of them.

The old testament matches the Dead Sea Scrolls, they where unearthed in 1946.....and it matched the books we had. The accuracy was amazing, over a thousand years!

Your comment about translations is faulty when it comes to the Torah and other books in the OT. Also the NT books are generally traced back to only two versions, Alexandrian and Byzantine.

instead of trying to make a faulty point about mistranslations you are welcome to peruse the oldest works and translations. We also have well documented vocabularies for Ancient Greek, Ancient Hebrew, and Aramaic.


In other words, many of the books we have in the OT especially are EXACT MATCHES to books unearthed and dated to be even as early as 200-400 BC. Yes many woke loonies like the person in the OP distort the words, but you can read the actual oldest translations yourself.



i think poster is reading NASB 2020
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The real problem is that Texas is no longer a Red state.

That's the only reason Taliweirdo is competitive. And if it wasn't him it would be some other commie.

Get your **** together Texas.
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Relax folks, there is no Trans Agenda.


Buuutttttttt.....




https://transtexas.org/trans-texas-takeover-tour/

Not sure how I got this Facebook ad, though I had just scrolled past posts from a local brewery that's hosting Talarico parties.







infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fighting about something that may or may not have happened 2000 years ago is so.... dumb.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91 said:

The real problem is that Texas is no longer a Red state.

That's the only reason Taliweirdo is competitive. And if it wasn't him it would be some other commie.

Get your **** together Texas.


Our Axis of Evil (Politicians, Corporations and B...) traded culture for money.

So this is where we are.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
infinity ag said:

Fighting about something that may or may not have happened 2000 years ago is so.... dumb.
I have staked my life on something that did happen 2000 years ago. You should, too.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What kind of weirdo would go to a church like that.
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

The real problem is that Texas is no longer a Red state.

That's the only reason Taliweirdo is competitive. And if it wasn't him it would be some other commie.

Get your **** together Texas.



Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now do senate elections. Those are not red state numbers.
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Dogdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

infinity ag said:

Fighting about something that may or may not have happened 2000 years ago is so.... dumb.

I have staked my ETERNAL SOUL on something that did happen 2000 years ago. You should, too.

FIFY
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

What kind of weirdo would go to a church like that.

"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OdessaAg said:

Could you imagine if these ideological morons tried sitting in a mosque and saying that BS about mohamed?


I'll buy the popcorn!
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CascadiaAg said:

Warning: This is utterly and absolutely rage inducing.

Another example of a trans "pastor" totally making up crap and reworking the message of the bible to fit her/his its pathetic agenda.

This is relevant in demonstrating how the liberal disease will intentionally misinterpret and recontextualize things that are obvious and apply it to something that fits their bias. The amazing part is that there is anyone that buys into this.

This is just another in a run of similar redefinition of "christianitxxxy" (their version, not the mainstream one) like we are seeing with Talarico's buddy, etc.




1. Target a respected institution
2. Kill & clean it
3. Wear it as a skin suit, while demanding respect
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

Fighting about something that may or may not have happened 2000 years ago is so.... dumb.


It was nearly 2026 years ago, let's be factual. Hope your life preserver is flame ******ant.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

And people wonder why Catholics don't let women be priests.

Are we sure that thing is a woman?
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

Now do senate elections. Those are not red state numbers.

Query: Has Texas been mostly red/conservative since 1950? (Which I knew it wouldn't be that far back, but I picked that year) Tower was the first Republican elected in Texas since reconstruction.

  • Reliably Red Era (Mid-1990sPresent): No Democrat has won a U.S. Senate election in Texas since Lloyd Bentsen in 1988, and the state has not elected a Democrat to any statewide office since 1994. Since Kay Bailey Hutchison won a 1993 special election, both of Texas's U.S. Senate seats have been continuously held by Republicansincluding Hutchison, Phil Gramm, John Cornyn, and Ted Cruz.
  • Competitive Margins in Recent Cycles: While Republicans have maintained an unbroken grip on both Senate seats for over three decades, races have grown closer in recent cyclessuch as Ted Cruz's 3-percentage-point win over Beto O'Rourke in 2018 (51% to 48%)though statewide Republican victories have held firm.
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These people are ******ed.

ETA: apparently we can't use the long form of tarded. So I'll say "delusional mongoloids."
Wearer of the Ring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I had Gramm for Macroeconomics. A+ teacher.
I feel so much better since about 11 a.m. CT on 20 Jan. 2025
aggiegolfer2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?

TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

TexAgs91 said:

Now do senate elections. Those are not red state numbers.

Query: Has Texas been mostly red/conservative since 1950? (Which I knew it wouldn't be that far back, but I picked that year) Tower was the first Republican elected in Texas since reconstruction.

  • Reliably Red Era (Mid-1990sPresent): No Democrat has won a U.S. Senate election in Texas since Lloyd Bentsen in 1988, and the state has not elected a Democrat to any statewide office since 1994. Since Kay Bailey Hutchison won a 1993 special election, both of Texas's U.S. Senate seats have been continuously held by Republicansincluding Hutchison, Phil Gramm, John Cornyn, and Ted Cruz.
  • Competitive Margins in Recent Cycles: While Republicans have maintained an unbroken grip on both Senate seats for over three decades, races have grown closer in recent cyclessuch as Ted Cruz's 3-percentage-point win over Beto O'Rourke in 2018 (51% to 48%)though statewide Republican victories have held firm.


Well I'm talking about now. But if your theory is that the state's political and population makeup hasn't changed since the 50s that would be nice. We'll have to see next month.
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

TexAgs91 said:

Now do senate elections. Those are not red state numbers.

Query: Has Texas been mostly red/conservative since 1950? (Which I knew it wouldn't be that far back, but I picked that year) Tower was the first Republican elected in Texas since reconstruction.

  • Reliably Red Era (Mid-1990sPresent): No Democrat has won a U.S. Senate election in Texas since Lloyd Bentsen in 1988, and the state has not elected a Democrat to any statewide office since 1994. Since Kay Bailey Hutchison won a 1993 special election, both of Texas's U.S. Senate seats have been continuously held by Republicansincluding Hutchison, Phil Gramm, John Cornyn, and Ted Cruz.
  • Competitive Margins in Recent Cycles: While Republicans have maintained an unbroken grip on both Senate seats for over three decades, races have grown closer in recent cyclessuch as Ted Cruz's 3-percentage-point win over Beto O'Rourke in 2018 (51% to 48%)though statewide Republican victories have held firm.


Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Refresh
Page 2 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.