Pretty weird topic but I'm glad the FBI is no longer focused on spying on local school boards and spending all of their resources on tracking the mythical white supremacist threat.

Ag with kids said:

---

nai06 said:

---

If a person were trafficked and forced to perform an act of beastiality, would that be pretty obvious and this not result in them getting convicted of it?

It seems like the only people who would be convicted of beastiality did so of their own free will.

---

Does it say anything about convictions?

Have you ever had to sit through a clearance interview? They ask ALL SORTS of questions about your past. If someone admits to something (you know, being honest), then a number of things can result in disqualification right there.

Admit to them that you smoked a little pot in college and see how that affects things. Not convicted of smoking pot, just admitting you did it.

---

Bingo. Beyond positive this is because of the clearance processes and not just check the box if you have a felony. Especially anything past Secret.

I don't get this, are the girls from the donkey show in Acuna trying to apply to the FBI?

There have been more than a few cases where people being trafficked/rated have been forced, either as adults or minors, to participate. Its not nearly as rare as people would think...

You did not have to be convicted to have been banned from being hired, simply not able to answer "no" and pass the polygraph.

And yeah, I can see an organization likenthe FBI employing former victims both for UC and non-uc work with that sort of thing. Just like hiring the "hackers" of the 90s, you hire subject matter experts to help combat issues...

Again, they are talking about actual sworn agents, not contractors/informants.

Dungeon Crawler Carl said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

He explicitly explained that he had seen cases of victims being excluded because of this.

I swear if some of you would apply an ounce of common sense to the propoganda you read you wouldn't be so easily manipulated by it.

---

How many male victims of bestiality do you think are created on annual basis? and of those how many apply to become FBI agents?????

---

More than zero..

I think I'm fine with even "victims" of bestiality getting excluded from FBI employment.

Ag_of_08 said:

---

There have been more than a few cases where people being trafficked/rated have been forced, either as adults or minors, to participate. Its not nearly as rare as people would think...

---

This thread is extremely weird.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Dungeon Crawler Carl said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

He explicitly explained that he had seen cases of victims being excluded because of this.

I swear if some of you would apply an ounce of common sense to the propoganda you read you wouldn't be so easily manipulated by it.

---

How many male victims of bestiality do you think are created on annual basis? and of those how many apply to become FBI agents?????

---

More than zero..

---

I'll take the under

This has to be solving a problem that doesn't exist.

Just how many qualified FBI applicants are there in the world that have been a victim of bestality? Probably zero. Why the fug even bring this up for the zero people it applies to?

"Love is love!"

JB93 said:

---

This has to be solving a problem that doesn't exist.

Just how many qualified FBI applicants are there in the world that have been a victim of bestality? Probably zero. Why the fug even bring this up for the zero people it applies to?

---

There is no such thing as a victim of beastiality. Only freaks think that.

Ed Harley said:

---

JB93 said:

---

This has to be solving a problem that doesn't exist.

Just how many qualified FBI applicants are there in the world that have been a victim of bestality? Probably zero. Why the fug even bring this up for the zero people it applies to?

---

There is no such thing as a victim of beastiality. Only freaks think that.

---

You are probably getting a ban hammer soon so I doubt this will remain, but if you actually took the time to research this instead of spouting off hateful nonsense on the internet, you would know it was for people under 18, who are victimized through all sorts of devious activities.

There is a whole world of terrible things done to children for the pleasure of sick individuals. Only an evil idiot would say these kids aren't victims.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://legislature.vermont.gov/Documents/2026/Workgroups/House%2520Judiciary/Bills/H.578/Witness%2520Testimony/H.578~Joanne%2520Bourbeau~ASAE%2520Case%2520Examples%2520one-pager~1-13-2026.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjfvuC2rPqWAxVUmWoFHWPzI00QFnoECCUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1ST_86_VPWYtZeoJTQuJa7

Quote:

---

Bestiality affects children and vulnerable adults as well as animals. Example cases include:
A 47-year-old man and two women sexually assaulted their children, their children's friends, and their pets
over a period of 12 years before being detected and arrested.
A 34-year-old woman beat, tortured, and prostituted a mentally-disabled woman whom she forced to have
sex with a dog for her clients.
A home healthcare nurse beat her elderly patient with an extension cord and forced her to fellate the
caretaker's dog.
A 49-year-old man sexually abused multiple little girls whom he bound, tortured, raped with objects, insects,
and small animals.
Two men aged 24 and 25 raped an unconscious woman with a snake.

---

Durrrrhurrrrhurrrr no victims durrhurrrhurr.

Quote:

---

Kennedy asked, "If Joe participated in bestiality, not as animal but as the human, don't you think he ought to be disqualified?"

"If he voluntarily did it, sure. But if he was trafficked into it ...," Patel responded.

---

People that voluntarily participated in beastiality are still disqualified.

It was a funny exchange, but that's the policy.

Spotted Ag said:

---

How can one be a victim of beastiality?

---

Did everyone forget that documentary Tiger King?

Sodomists of all varieties exist.

50 shades of hay.

Ed Harley said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

This thread really shows how outrage bait works.

Post a semi-factual comment, leave out the details that actually matter, and then see how many people fall for it because they read only the headline, or don't bother to fact check for even 5 seconds.

This is about victims of crimes, not about someone who willingly had sex with an animal. Why should someone who was trafficked and abused be denied a job with the FBI because of something he or she had no control over?

---

No, this thread shows how people can be manipulated into thinking beasiality is ok.

---

LOL. I doubt anyone on the thread thinks it is okay.

That's a weird thing to focus on. The left should be giddy though. I'm sure they'll want to include marriage to animals in the near future. It's all about love remember...

nai06 said:

---

If a person were trafficked and forced to perform an act of beastiality, would that be pretty obvious and this not result in them getting convicted of it?

It seems like the only people who would be convicted of beastiality did so of their own free will.

---

As I understand it, it is because the guidance didn't say "convicted". It said "engaged".

Reading that literally, you cannot deny that victims are also engaged in the acts. Just not willingly.