Yeah. Thats why.
.
Anthropic CEO says AI needs to be slowed down
11,566 Views |
214 Replies |
Last: 8 days ago by Logos Stick
These scammy AI CEOs are now leaking more news to bolster their case by scaring people.
Everything that comes out about these guys is more proof about what I said long ago.
AI CEOs: Give us what we want else we will blow up the world!!!
If OpenAI loves humanity so much, they should just shut shop and close down their company.
OpenAI says it found more instances of AI models acting deceptively
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/16/tech/ai-models-acting-deceptively-openai
Everything that comes out about these guys is more proof about what I said long ago.
AI CEOs: Give us what we want else we will blow up the world!!!
If OpenAI loves humanity so much, they should just shut shop and close down their company.
OpenAI says it found more instances of AI models acting deceptively
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/16/tech/ai-models-acting-deceptively-openai
Quote:
OpenAI found additional incidents of AI models acting deceptively and taking unsanctioned actions during training, the company announced Wednesday. It's also introducing a new process for the company to publicly report such instances.
Under the new system, OpenAI will share updates on concerning AI behavior more frequently instead of waiting to bundle multiple instances into one report. The company said it wants to share more information about troubling AI behavior in the absence of an industry-wide standard.
The announcement comes after tech leaders called for a slowdown in AI development to prevent the technology from advancing beyond human control.
"As AI systems grow more advanced and more widely deployed, we need to build a broader and better-informed consensus on the progress of alignment research," OpenAI wrote in a blog post Wednesday. "Alignment" refers to the process of making sure AI acts the way humans want and expect.
"We do not believe that the AI industry has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer," the post said.
Reasons for the AI Slowdown revealed?
— Zach Vorhies / Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) September 17, 2026
OpenAI & Anthropic agents "planted" messages across the internet instructing later agents to create swarms. Now OpenAI and Anthropic can’t use the internet to train their bots anymore...
Andrew Yang: "what happened was the bots that got… pic.twitter.com/oKY1r7T9sh
" Reasons for the AI Slowdown revealed?
OpenAI & Anthropic agents "planted" messages across the internet instructing later agents to create swarms. Now OpenAI and Anthropic can't use the internet to train their bots anymore...
Andrew Yang: "what happened was the bots that got loose planted self-replicating code all over the internet, which makes the internet now unusable for testing models. So what happens now is that OpenAI and Anthropic have to create synthetic internets to train their bots, which is going to take some time and money...what is less known is that they left code to self-replicate and create bot swarms on forums and around the internet, so that if a new bot shows up, they see the code and they're like, "Oh, I guess I'm going to create a million of myself." And so now the major firms have polluted the internet." "
Summary:
- The Terminator thing is garbage.
- They don't have AGI and they likely never will and if they do it won't be for many many years.
- Token maxxing is over.
- There are no moats to their business and open models are a big threat to these companies.
- They want to create fear to create the regulatory environment to create the moats to protect their businesses.
No one needs to know a thing about AI to recognize a psyop.
But a whole lot of experts are now exposed as scammers over the past few days.
The last few days all but guarantee their will be no central oversight of AI, and that's something we should all rejoice.
But a whole lot of experts are now exposed as scammers over the past few days.
The last few days all but guarantee their will be no central oversight of AI, and that's something we should all rejoice.
In case you are having trouble figuring out what’s going on here is a summary:
— John Ennis (@johnennis) September 17, 2026
Anthropic and OpenAI desperately need regulatory capture or they are going to go out of business, and the Trump administration is not inclined to give it to them
The Democratic party currently has no…
Quote:
In case you are having trouble figuring out what's going on here is a summary:
Anthropic and OpenAI desperately need regulatory capture or they are going to go out of business, and the Trump administration is not inclined to give it to them
The Democratic party currently has no platform, as Trump is doing fine (other than perhaps the
Iran war but Americans don't really care about that), but they have identified that AI and data centers are a hot topic that they can ride
So these two somewhat desperate groups have teamed up to run a psyop around the actual real topic of AI safety, greatly exaggerating the risks, with the understanding that if the Democrats get back into power they will provide the regulatory capture needed to keep these companies alive
In return, these companies will support the Democratic Party and help to enforce left-wing ideology through the models
Kind of sucks, but that's what's happening, and we need to oppose it because it will not be good if this plan succeeds
Thunderstruck xx said:Reasons for the AI Slowdown revealed?
— Zach Vorhies / Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) September 17, 2026
OpenAI & Anthropic agents "planted" messages across the internet instructing later agents to create swarms. Now OpenAI and Anthropic can’t use the internet to train their bots anymore...
Andrew Yang: "what happened was the bots that got… pic.twitter.com/oKY1r7T9sh
" Reasons for the AI Slowdown revealed?
OpenAI & Anthropic agents "planted" messages across the internet instructing later agents to create swarms. Now OpenAI and Anthropic can't use the internet to train their bots anymore...
Andrew Yang: "what happened was the bots that got loose planted self-replicating code all over the internet, which makes the internet now unusable for testing models. So what happens now is that OpenAI and Anthropic have to create synthetic internets to train their bots, which is going to take some time and money...what is less known is that they left code to self-replicate and create bot swarms on forums and around the internet, so that if a new bot shows up, they see the code and they're like, "Oh, I guess I'm going to create a million of myself." And so now the major firms have polluted the internet." "
Oh what a tangled web we weave!
Well done, "corporate leaders".
I'm enjoying them writhe in agony.
flown-the-coop said:
No one needs to know a thing about AI to recognize a psyop.
But a whole lot of experts are now exposed as scammers over the past few days.
The last few days all but guarantee their will be no central oversight of AI, and that's something we should all rejoice.
Most of these AI companies will be gone in a year or two. Consolidated. Perplexity will be the first one to go. They are not even in the news anymore. Their CEO was boasting that in 6 months HR will be "gone". That was 2 years ago.
I feel only Google and Microsoft will remain. Anthro and OpenAI will be absorbed. Much like Netscape was in the glory days of the browser wars.
Grok will be the standard. Not even close.
flown-the-coop said:
Grok will be the standard. Not even close.
Grok.. well they will be a player but I don't think they will be the standard. Elon can't seem to stay focused on an idea for too long.
I foresee (US companies)
1. Google
2. Microsoft
3. Xai
infinity ag said:flown-the-coop said:
Grok will be the standard. Not even close.
Grok.. well they will be a player but I don't think they will be the standard. Elon can't seem to stay focused on an idea for too long.
I foresee (US companies)
1. Google
2. Microsoft
3. Xai
Roger that. I think that just about confirms that Grok will be the lead horse.
infinity ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No one needs to know a thing about AI to recognize a psyop.
But a whole lot of experts are now exposed as scammers over the past few days.
The last few days all but guarantee their will be no central oversight of AI, and that's something we should all rejoice.
Most of these AI companies will be gone in a year or two. Consolidated. Perplexity will be the first one to go. They are not even in the news anymore. Their CEO was boasting that in 6 months HR will be "gone". That was 2 years ago.
I feel only Google and Microsoft will remain. Anthro and OpenAI will be absorbed. Much like Netscape was in the glory days of the browser wars.
LOLOL... Anthropic is turning a profit.
I'll make you a bet. If Anthropic is gone in the next year, I'll never post here again. If they are still around, you never post here again. Bet?!
Netscape didn't survive because MS baked in IE - you had the browser on first boot from the OEM - and everyone was using 1200 baud modems! That meant 4 hours to download Netscape! Apples and hand grenades!
I wonder if his comments have more to do with the economics of AI and the inability for AI companies, such as his company, to deliver on the big promises it makes.
Logos Stick said:infinity ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No one needs to know a thing about AI to recognize a psyop.
But a whole lot of experts are now exposed as scammers over the past few days.
The last few days all but guarantee their will be no central oversight of AI, and that's something we should all rejoice.
Most of these AI companies will be gone in a year or two. Consolidated. Perplexity will be the first one to go. They are not even in the news anymore. Their CEO was boasting that in 6 months HR will be "gone". That was 2 years ago.
I feel only Google and Microsoft will remain. Anthro and OpenAI will be absorbed. Much like Netscape was in the glory days of the browser wars.
LOLOL... Anthropic is turning a profit.
I'll make you a bet. If Anthropic is gone in the next year, I'll never post here again. If they are still around, you never post here again. Bet?!
Netscape didn't survive because MS baked in IE - you had the browser on first boot from the OEM - and everyone was using 1200 baud modems! That meant 4 hours to download Netscape! Apples and hand grenades!
I didn't say anything about a profit. I am saying that in a year or two (approx), Anthropic will be acquired by one of the big dogs. May even be Amazon as they aren't really an AI power right now but they have a lot of $$$ to throw around. Anthropic in my opinion has peaked and so you see Dario making panic posts asking for regulation. He knows he has nowhere to go. Just a week ago he was threatening the world with annihilation.
a year or 2 or 3 or 4?! LOL
I say they won't be consumed within a year.
Bet?
I say they won't be consumed within a year.
Bet?
Funny how AI was okay and cutting edge with biden, but is now the boogey man.
But also not funny how the internet can sway opinion of a whole, supposedly educated nation-- just like covid fear!
But also not funny how the internet can sway opinion of a whole, supposedly educated nation-- just like covid fear!
ErnestEndeavor said:
Summary:
- The Terminator thing is garbage.
- They don't have AGI and they likely never will and if they do it won't be for many many years.
- Token maxxing is over.
- There are no moats to their business and open models are a big threat to these companies.
- They want to create fear to create the regulatory environment to create the moats to protect their businesses.
" They don't have AGI and they likely never will and if they do it won't be for many many years."
LOL
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Ad Lunam
If Hugging face was attacked by OpenAI's AI test, then Hugging face should have sued the crap out of OpenAI.
Then you don't have AI companies whining that they need to be regulated or they might do damage.
If they might actually sued for large amounts of money because they haven't sufficiently constrained their own AI then they might actually start sufficiently constraining their own AI.
Then you don't have AI companies whining that they need to be regulated or they might do damage.
If they might actually sued for large amounts of money because they haven't sufficiently constrained their own AI then they might actually start sufficiently constraining their own AI.
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Ad Lunam
Logos Stick said:
a year or 2 or 3 or 4?! LOL
I say they won't be consumed within a year.
Bet?
I said this:
Quote:
Most of these AI companies will be gone in a year or two.
At most 3 years. But these companies will be gone and only 3 companies are going to exist for AI.
The last people to listen to on AI are the folks who were involved in trading in subprime mortgages and derivatives. They happened to get one right and now they are used as experts on everything.
Numerous times the last several years, Michael Burry has told people to sell out of the market completely. People have lost a **** ton of wealth listening to them.
Numerous times the last several years, Michael Burry has told people to sell out of the market completely. People have lost a **** ton of wealth listening to them.
TexAgs91 said:
If Hugging face was attacked by OpenAI's AI test, then Hugging face should have sued the crap out of OpenAI.
Then you don't have AI companies whining that they need to be regulated or they might do damage.
If they might actually sued for large amounts of money because they haven't sufficiently constrained their own AI then they might actually start sufficiently constraining their own AI.
But Nvidia bought Hugging Face. Nvidia would never sue OpenAI because that would destroy demand for their product. (Talked about in the video above).
infinity ag said:flown-the-coop said:
Grok will be the standard. Not even close.
Grok.. well they will be a player but I don't think they will be the standard. Elon can't seem to stay focused on an idea for too long.
That's why he hires people to lead his companies. Each of his companies don't need Elon to focus on them 100%. They need someone to be focused on them 100%.
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Ad Lunam
Owlagdad said:
Funny how AI was okay and cutting edge with biden, but is now the boogey man.
But also not funny how the internet can sway opinion of a whole, supposedly educated nation-- just like covid fear!
We don't have an AI czar like Kamala and Trump is in collusion with China, Russia and NVIDIA to destroy all humans.
Alex Karp (founder of Palantir) on CNBC right now giving an absolute fascinating take on AI regardless of if you are a fan of him. Recommend watching it.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
Everyone knows it's a psyop to get regulations that would block self hosted LLMs.
That way the AI companies and governments can get all of your data from running the AI in the cloud.
That way the AI companies and governments can get all of your data from running the AI in the cloud.
bmks270 said:
Everyone knows it's a psyop to get regulations that would block self hosted LLMs.
That way the AI companies and governments can get all of your data from running the AI in the cloud.
Highly possible. I would recommend Karp's interview though. Fascinating stuff solely because he's not corporate at all. He's Elonesque in that he has almost no Governor and says what he's thinking.
TexAgs91 said:infinity ag said:flown-the-coop said:
Grok will be the standard. Not even close.
Grok.. well they will be a player but I don't think they will be the standard. Elon can't seem to stay focused on an idea for too long.
That's why he hires people to lead his companies. Each of his companies don't need Elon to focus on them 100%. They need someone to be focused on them 100%.
Hiring people is not the same as a super-focused founder being involved 24/7. xAI and Tesla are Elon's babies. If he hires someone, he would be just doing it for the money. Not the same thing.
YouBet said:
Alex Karp (founder of Palantir) on CNBC right now giving an absolute fascinating take on AI regardless of if you are a fan of him. Recommend watching it.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
I think that at some point, but AFTER AI has committed some really big F-up, there will be controls on AI just like there are controls on nuclear tech. I cannot build a nuke in my backyard, so in some time I won't be able to build a model above a certain level of sophistication in my home lab.
Dangerous tech always has controls imposed for the good of society. AI is no different.
However it will take some time and some serious damage before it happens.
infinity ag said:YouBet said:
Alex Karp (founder of Palantir) on CNBC right now giving an absolute fascinating take on AI regardless of if you are a fan of him. Recommend watching it.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
I think that at some point, but AFTER AI has committed some really big F-up, there will be controls on AI just like there are controls on nuclear tech. I cannot build a nuke in my backyard, so in some time I won't be able to build a model above a certain level of sophistication in my home lab.
Dangerous tech always has controls imposed for the good of society. AI is no different.
However it will take some time and some serious damage before it happens.
He actually made this point and compared AI to the Manhattan Project. If these AI leaders are flat out telling us it's this dangerous, then the only way out of the liability from it is to nationalize it.
YouBet said:infinity ag said:YouBet said:
Alex Karp (founder of Palantir) on CNBC right now giving an absolute fascinating take on AI regardless of if you are a fan of him. Recommend watching it.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
I think that at some point, but AFTER AI has committed some really big F-up, there will be controls on AI just like there are controls on nuclear tech. I cannot build a nuke in my backyard, so in some time I won't be able to build a model above a certain level of sophistication in my home lab.
Dangerous tech always has controls imposed for the good of society. AI is no different.
However it will take some time and some serious damage before it happens.
He actually made this point and compared AI to the Manhattan Project. If these AI leaders are flat out telling us it's this dangerous, then the only way out of the liability from it is to nationalize it.
Yes, it will happen. But only after a major tragic disaster.
YouBet said:infinity ag said:YouBet said:
Alex Karp (founder of Palantir) on CNBC right now giving an absolute fascinating take on AI regardless of if you are a fan of him. Recommend watching it.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
I think that at some point, but AFTER AI has committed some really big F-up, there will be controls on AI just like there are controls on nuclear tech. I cannot build a nuke in my backyard, so in some time I won't be able to build a model above a certain level of sophistication in my home lab.
Dangerous tech always has controls imposed for the good of society. AI is no different.
However it will take some time and some serious damage before it happens.
He actually made this point and compared AI to the Manhattan Project. If these AI leaders are flat out telling us it's this dangerous, then the only way out of the liability from it is to nationalize it.
Can you image AI nationalized under the hands of the woke, Marxist Dems?! Nothing coming out of an LLM could be trusted.
Logos Stick said:YouBet said:infinity ag said:YouBet said:
Alex Karp (founder of Palantir) on CNBC right now giving an absolute fascinating take on AI regardless of if you are a fan of him. Recommend watching it.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
I think that at some point, but AFTER AI has committed some really big F-up, there will be controls on AI just like there are controls on nuclear tech. I cannot build a nuke in my backyard, so in some time I won't be able to build a model above a certain level of sophistication in my home lab.
Dangerous tech always has controls imposed for the good of society. AI is no different.
However it will take some time and some serious damage before it happens.
He actually made this point and compared AI to the Manhattan Project. If these AI leaders are flat out telling us it's this dangerous, then the only way out of the liability from it is to nationalize it.
Can you image AI nationalized under the hands of the woke, Marxist Dems?! Nothing coming out of an LLM could be trusted.
Yep. The downside of that for sure.
infinity ag said:TexAgs91 said:infinity ag said:flown-the-coop said:
Grok will be the standard. Not even close.
Grok.. well they will be a player but I don't think they will be the standard. Elon can't seem to stay focused on an idea for too long.
That's why he hires people to lead his companies. Each of his companies don't need Elon to focus on them 100%. They need someone to be focused on them 100%.
Hiring people is not the same as a super-focused founder being involved 24/7. xAI and Tesla are Elon's babies. If he hires someone, he would be just doing it for the money. Not the same thing.
That's your assumption. What evidence do you have that Elon hires people to lead his companies that are only in it for the money?
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Ad Lunam
Logos Stick said:YouBet said:infinity ag said:YouBet said:
Alex Karp (founder of Palantir) on CNBC right now giving an absolute fascinating take on AI regardless of if you are a fan of him. Recommend watching it.
He's a bit hard to follow because he's so animated and passionate and all over the place but his headline take: AI will get ultimately get nationalized because they are the only entity that can absorb the liability of AI. He respects Dario a lot because Dario is essentially leading the industry down that path because he thinks that is the ethical thing to do. IOW, the AI leaders are flat out telling us it's dangerous so they have set themselves up for liability they can't survive as a public/private company.
Separately, Karp agrees with our progressive tax system but does not agree with a wealth tax because it kills entrepreneurship.
I think that at some point, but AFTER AI has committed some really big F-up, there will be controls on AI just like there are controls on nuclear tech. I cannot build a nuke in my backyard, so in some time I won't be able to build a model above a certain level of sophistication in my home lab.
Dangerous tech always has controls imposed for the good of society. AI is no different.
However it will take some time and some serious damage before it happens.
He actually made this point and compared AI to the Manhattan Project. If these AI leaders are flat out telling us it's this dangerous, then the only way out of the liability from it is to nationalize it.
Can you image AI nationalized under the hands of the woke, Marxist Dems?! Nothing coming out of an LLM could be trusted.
That is exactly the danger. AI basically amplifies its developers' (or controlling political party's) ideals and morals a billion fold.
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Ad Lunam
TexAgs91 said:infinity ag said:TexAgs91 said:infinity ag said:flown-the-coop said:
Grok will be the standard. Not even close.
Grok.. well they will be a player but I don't think they will be the standard. Elon can't seem to stay focused on an idea for too long.
That's why he hires people to lead his companies. Each of his companies don't need Elon to focus on them 100%. They need someone to be focused on them 100%.
Hiring people is not the same as a super-focused founder being involved 24/7. xAI and Tesla are Elon's babies. If he hires someone, he would be just doing it for the money. Not the same thing.
That's your assumption. What evidence do you have that Elon hires people to lead his companies that are only in it for the money?
There is a reason some folks are injuns and not chiefs.
Featured Stories
See All
48:31
21h ago
4.4k
Stress of Mizzou's offense requires increase in A&M pressure
by Olin Buchanan
7:33
17h ago
1.5k
Setting the Scene: Aggies head to Columbia as Week 6 underdogs
by Richard Zane
Takeaways from Texas A&M's exhibition loss to Rice
by Richard Zane
Key Matchups: Texas A&M at No. 14 Missouri
by Olin Buchanan