End of Compulsory Military Service and Societal Decay

6,406 Views | 108 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by Gunny456
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FIDO_Ags said:

Quote:

Nice with the dig at the end. Getting folks to do unnatural things like standing in a line and getting shot at is not accomplished through "training". It's accomplished through brainwashing, manipulation, threat and coercion.


This thread should be retitled "How to Know You Never Spent Time in the Military Without Saying You Never Spent Time in the Military".

Who on here spent time serving in the civil war, which is what that comment refers to.

Some of you who have served like to tarnish the service of all with the condescension for those who, for whatever reason, have not served.
Dobro Turtlebane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Dobro Turtlebane said:

flown-the-coop said:

Dobro Turtlebane said:

flown-the-coop said:


A key component of military training is to make those minds all behave the same.


Please provide citations for this deeply held belief presented as fact.

You teach a bunch of independent thinking exercises and creativity in basic training?

How about you provide the "citations".

In the meantime, people understand the concept of military training and that it's not aimed to provide an environment of innovation, creativity and independent thinking. That's horse*****


To quote you, you stated the fact so you have to provide evidence.

Yes, the military teaches how to innovate. Here are the guidelines, execute how you see fit within the intent. Hell, the military has entire graduate-level programs on this - SAMS being one. You keep getting hung up on basic training, is that because you're basing your research on the first half of Full Metal Jacket? Basic Training provides about 1/100th of 1% of what someone learns in their first year of the military

Maybe you missed the OP about basic military training.

No one has said, including me not saying, that military training is of little value, worthless, doesn't teach you anything. The OP was NOT regarding everyone going to war college and doing 20 years.

Step back and read the thread rather than strawmanning an argument Keith myself nor anyone other than you and a couple of others are trying to make.

It's absolutely absurd to say basic military training teaches innovation and creativity. Or maybe basic military training is now like Girl Scouts and you learn to sell cookies, come and go as your please, eat what you want, behave the way you like. Is that what you are trying to get at? That basic training is not about rigid discipline, following orders, etc? Maybe I do have a dated concept…


Your exact point was that military discipline - not constrained to basic training - is antithetical to innovation. You claimed that military discipline is equivalent to being an automaton who is only able to follow an IKEA-like instruction manual (your bridge building silliness).

If something is a "key component" then it should be easy to provide dozens of citations - published research, DoD policy and training manuals, the historical godfathers.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No it was constrained to basic military training as intended in the OP.

You strawmanning it to something else is nothing but a derail.

Though again the rigid nature of military is by design antithetical to open minded thinking and independent behavior through the ranks.

Just because their is some creative DEI classes at the War College doesn't change that.

Since folks don't care to read the OP that I originally replied to, here it is:

Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Name a career that is not rigid at the beginning. Medicine, aviation, law, engineering and the trades all start with rules, hierarchy, repetition and doing things the prescribed way.

Competence comes before autonomy.

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fdsa said:

Name a career that is not rigid at the beginning. Medicine, aviation, law, engineering and the trades all start with rules, hierarchy, repetition and doing things the prescribed way.

Competence comes before autonomy.



You are so far off topic it's starting to get concerning.

But to play your game, architecture, any sort of design, careers in writing, teaching, most business startup… all allow for and thrive from creativity, innovation, autonomy, etc.

The reason "competency before autonomy" is suited for the military is the same reason innovation, creativity and independence are not core to basic military training.

This is not a difficult concept.
Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Fdsa said:

Name a career that is not rigid at the beginning. Medicine, aviation, law, engineering and the trades all start with rules, hierarchy, repetition and doing things the prescribed way.

Competence comes before autonomy.



You are so far off topic it's starting to get concerning.

But to play your game, architecture, any sort of design, careers in writing, teaching, most business startup… all allow for and thrive from creativity, innovation, autonomy, etc.

The reason "competency before autonomy" is suited for the military is the same reason innovation, creativity and independence are not core to basic military training.

This is not a difficult concept.
competency before autonomy is suitable for all careers of consequence including the ones you listed above.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fdsa said:

flown-the-coop said:

Fdsa said:

Name a career that is not rigid at the beginning. Medicine, aviation, law, engineering and the trades all start with rules, hierarchy, repetition and doing things the prescribed way.

Competence comes before autonomy.



You are so far off topic it's starting to get concerning.

But to play your game, architecture, any sort of design, careers in writing, teaching, most business startup… all allow for and thrive from creativity, innovation, autonomy, etc.

The reason "competency before autonomy" is suited for the military is the same reason innovation, creativity and independence are not core to basic military training.

This is not a difficult concept.
competency before autonomy is suitable for all careers of consequence including the ones you listed above.

Last I checked, competence is a minimum requirement of any job / career.

And autonomy is not a synonym for creativity, innovation, or self-starting. Perhaps therein lies some of your continued misunderstanding.
Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Autonomy is generally required for creativity to flourish. In the careers listed above, you rarely hear "be creative" in your first two months. You learn the basics, prove competence, and move out with some autonomy to solve hard problems creatively.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fdsa said:

Autonomy is generally required for creativity to flourish. In the careers listed above, you rarely hear "be creative" in your first two months. You learn the basics, prove competence, and move out with some autonomy to solve hard problems creatively.

"Generally" and "rarely" seem like crawfishing. Plus, since you seem to desire to equate everything to military training, what military training gives you 2 months then sends you out in your own to solve problems creatively? Maybe things are different these days.

So an 18yo signs up, goes through basic, is handed his gear then shipped off and said figure it out and hope it goes well?

Does that happen after 2 months? 2 years? 20 years? Hint: unless you are POTUS, someone is always above you telling you what to do, when to do it and almost always how to do it.

That is somewhat unique to the military. But you do you bro.
BkYdPitmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not a lack of a draft. It's the lack of fathers, and strong fathers in the home.
Backyard Pitmaster
flyrancher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have read the majority of posts here and have one comment. Those who have never served in the military are in no position to evaluate its value. The pros and cons of service are beyond your comprehension. You cannot be trusted to evaluate something in which you never participated or experienced.
flyrancher
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flyrancher said:

I have read the majority of posts here and have one comment. Those who have never served in the military are in no position to evaluate its value. The pros and cons of service are beyond your comprehension. You cannot be trusted to evaluate something in which you never participated or experienced.

That's funny and so incredibly condescending.

It's also bizarre because I don't think anyone questioned its "value".

But it's ludicrous to say anyone who never donned the uniform can have any assessment, evaluation or criticism of the military. Truly a fanatically bizarre take.
Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Fdsa said:

Autonomy is generally required for creativity to flourish. In the careers listed above, you rarely hear "be creative" in your first two months. You learn the basics, prove competence, and move out with some autonomy to solve hard problems creatively.

"Generally" and "rarely" seem like crawfishing. Plus, since you seem to desire to equate everything to military training, what military training gives you 2 months then sends you out in your own to solve problems creatively? Maybe things are different these days.

So an 18yo signs up, goes through basic, is handed his gear then shipped off and said figure it out and hope it goes well?

Does that happen after 2 months? 2 years? 20 years? Hint: unless you are POTUS, someone is always above you telling you what to do, when to do it and almost always how to do it.

That is somewhat unique to the military. But you do you bro.
just like any other career, every timeline is different. A majority of military careers have almost identical civilian equivalents….and you're dead wrong about always being told "how to do it." Around the 2-3 year mark for both officers and enlisted, you are expected to figure things out on your own. There are guidelines of course but you are often alone in figuring things out. Ridiculous regulations often require creativity.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Fdsa said:

Autonomy is generally required for creativity to flourish. In the careers listed above, you rarely hear "be creative" in your first two months. You learn the basics, prove competence, and move out with some autonomy to solve hard problems creatively.

"Generally" and "rarely" seem like crawfishing. Plus, since you seem to desire to equate everything to military training, what military training gives you 2 months then sends you out in your own to solve problems creatively? Maybe things are different these days.

So an 18yo signs up, goes through basic, is handed his gear then shipped off and said figure it out and hope it goes well?

Does that happen after 2 months? 2 years? 20 years? Hint: unless you are POTUS, someone is always above you telling you what to do, when to do it and almost always how to do it.

That is somewhat unique to the military. But you do you bro.


You're almost there. Boot camp, which you said earlier was the narrow focus here, is just the basic introduction for a trainable recruit. It's ludicrous to compare training in bootcamp to an architect
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flyrancher said:

I have read the majority of posts here and have one comment. Those who have never served in the military are in no position to evaluate its value. The pros and cons of service are beyond your comprehension. You cannot be trusted to evaluate something in which you never participated or experienced.


It is amusing that the thread lamenting the lack of compulsory service was started by a guy that didn't serve, and the most prolific poster on it telling people about military training… also didn't serve.
WBBQ74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

flyrancher said:

I have read the majority of posts here and have one comment. Those who have never served in the military are in no position to evaluate its value. The pros and cons of service are beyond your comprehension. You cannot be trusted to evaluate something in which you never participated or experienced.

That's funny and so incredibly condescending.

It's also bizarre because I don't think anyone questioned its "value".

But it's ludicrous to say anyone who never donned the uniform can have any assessment, evaluation or criticism of the military. Truly a fanatically bizarre take.


Folks without a DD214 commenting on what military service is and is not is like a man talking about how it feels to have a baby
Texas Aggie Bandsman, Class of 1974
bubblesthechimp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and like the OP saying "well i didnt serve but do you know who my father is he's got enough clout for me to have not served but everyone else should serve"
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When I was a junior officer in the early 1990s I knew a considerable number of Marines that had entered the Corps during the draft and a couple that had been drafted and ended up making a career in the Corps. None of them looked back on the era of the draft and thought conscription was good for the Corps. Their most vivid memory recalled by most Marines of that era was of Gen Louis Wilson becoming Commandant after the end of the Vietnam War and instituting the expeditious discharge program to get rid of Marines that didn't want to be in the Corps, especially those that had been drafted.

I did a tour on recruiting duty in the mid 1990s that only reinforced to me that the military really didn't gain anything from drafting unwilling recruits. The time and resources that go into training an unmotivated recruit are considerably more than for those that are volunteers. NCOs end up babysitting problem recruits and remediating them on how to perform simple tasks. The amount of supervision required is far greater.

This is particularly true of those with lower mental aptitude i.e. Mental Category IV (<31 AFQT) and V (<21 AFQT). If you don't work with people of low intelligence as your coworkers or subordinates on a regular basis then it may be difficult to appreciate how big a difference and advantages a team of only average intelligence is compared to people of Forrest Gump level intelligence but without his sense of duty or motivation.

Having said all that in condemnation of the suggestion of compulsory military service, I am gradually shifting to the position that it may be of a greater value to the nation that there is compulsory military service at least for entry level training. There are societal benefits of giving the young adults of America a common baseline of shared experience in a humbling adverse environment that would teach them some basic skills of responsibility and leadership they would use the rest of their life.

Eight to ten weeks of entry level training that includes shaved heads, little sleep, communal showers & toilets, and lots of PT would improve 90% of the general population. They would live amongst a cross section of American society that very few do because they never leave their cohort in social status or geographic neighborhood. After the boot camp, discharge them into an individual ready reserve status with eligibility to be recalled to active duty to complete MOS training for four years. They would get a small paycheck for a couple of months in boot camp and the top 10% could be offered accession directly into the regular active duty component or officer candidate school. There will be cream that rises to the top in every class. It would not be cheap to do this but it might be worth it for the unifying effect that military service, even just boot camp, tends to have on those that graduate.
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

But it's ludicrous to say anyone who never donned the uniform can have any assessment, evaluation or criticism of the military. Truly a fanatically bizarre take.


No, it's ludicrous for you to act like you have any understanding of how the military works without having ever donned a uniform. That is bizarre.

Now, if you want to comment on US Foreign Policy or even strategy, go right ahead, our Constitution allows for it since we put civilians in charge of the military.

But you have no basis to comment on how the military works since you didn't even go thru the minimum requirement of basic training.
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

flyrancher said:

I have read the majority of posts here and have one comment. Those who have never served in the military are in no position to evaluate its value. The pros and cons of service are beyond your comprehension. You cannot be trusted to evaluate something in which you never participated or experienced.

That's funny and so incredibly condescending.

It's also bizarre because I don't think anyone questioned its "value".

But it's ludicrous to say anyone who never donned the uniform can have any assessment, evaluation or criticism of the military. Truly a fanatically bizarre take.


Agreed. It sounds like the argument that black people make telling you it's impossible for you to relate because you aren't black. It's a dumb argument when they make it and it's a dumb argument here.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90 said:

Having said all that in condemnation of the suggestion of compulsory military service, I am gradually shifting to the position that it may be of a greater value to the nation that there is compulsory military service at least for entry level training. There are societal benefits of giving the young adults of America a common baseline of shared experience in a humbling adverse environment that would teach them some basic skills of responsibility and leadership they would use the rest of their life.

Eight to ten weeks of entry level training that includes shaved heads, little sleep, communal showers & toilets, and lots of PT would improve 90% of the general population. They would live amongst a cross section of American society that very few do because they never leave their cohort in social status or geographic neighborhood. After the boot camp, discharge them into an individual ready reserve status with eligibility to be recalled to active duty to complete MOS training for four years. They would get a small paycheck for a couple of months in boot camp and the top 10% could be offered accession directly into the regular active duty component or officer candidate school. There will be cream that rises to the top in every class. It would not be cheap to do this but it might be worth it for the unifying effect that military service, even just boot camp, tends to have on those that graduate.

We cannot afford what we are already paying for, adding compulsory military service for everyone (when few would ever serve) would be a disaster. Housing them, feeding them, transporting them, training them, etc., where is that money going to come from.

The military has a purpose and should stick to that, and stay out of trying to improve "societal benefits" as you pose. The military was never intended for that purpose nor should it be.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also, for "everyone" to complete the training, it would have to be dumbed down to the point that it would defeat the intended purpose.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can you imagine for awful boarding an airplane will become if all of a sudden everyone is a veteran?
JABQ04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AustinAg2K said:

Can you imagine for awful boarding an airplane will become if all of a sudden everyone is a veteran?

All I hear them say is active duty military in uniform are allowed to board first. Nothing for veterans.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are other ways for men to be more masculine, and one is to not give women preferential treatment in schools, college admits, jobs and promotions. Let them struggle with the men and if they are better, let them get the reward. Else stay home and make sandwiches. Nothing wrong in cooking and making babies.

The problem with this DEI culture is women get far ahead with too little effort compared to men. Then they lose attraction for men because women are hypergamous (they marry up). So too many women are fighting for the 1% super alpha men and most are unhappy when they lose.

So this impacts masculinity when men who are not in the 1% of men can't find wives because the womanosphere is littered with women in top schools and high jobs when they don't deserve it.

No military training and no drafting. If you want to draft then add foreign workers and make them server also for a year before working in the US.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In a modern military, a great many young men would pretty much be the last thing we need. Today's military requires much more intelligence than it did when winning a war depended on how many soldiers we had.
Aggie Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UTExan: When my son was in Cub Scouts, I was a Den Leader. When the boys got restless, we did 3-to-5 second rushes, bounding overwatch, and assault through ambush drills.
BlueSmoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OR, you can have your kid serve on their own, and be MILES ahead of everyone else. Most schools have an ROTC/Guard component.
Nobody cares. Work Harder
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Infantry said:

UTExan: When my son was in Cub Scouts, I was a Den Leader. When the boys got restless, we did 3-to-5 second rushes, bounding overwatch, and assault through ambush drills.

Excellent!
Although I would discourage using the Chevy Tahoe as a fire support vehicle if it came to that.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
5Amp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

flyrancher said:

I have read the majority of posts here and have one comment. Those who have never served in the military are in no position to evaluate its value. The pros and cons of service are beyond your comprehension. You cannot be trusted to evaluate something in which you never participated or experienced.


It is amusing that the thread lamenting the lack of compulsory service was started by a guy that didn't serve, and the most prolific poster on it telling people about military training… also didn't serve.

Much like our President
musicman55
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EFR said:

Even during WW2 only about 10-12% of the us population was in uniform, a far cry from "most men".

Offering this statistic as a measurement against the "us population" is a bit misleading. Most of the US population in WWII was not eligible for the draft. Children and those of a "certain age", of course. Many women served in uniform, but only as volunteers... they were not subject to, nor eligible to be, drafted.

Even among men, draft eligibility was limited to men ages 18 through 45 who qualified physically. During the early days of the war, draft "preference" was given to single men over those married.... my married Dad didn't enter the USAAF until 1943. Men aged 45-65 also had to register for what was euphemistically called the "old man's draft" but men were drafted under this protocol were not eligible for combat assignments.

A more meaningful statistic would be "what percentage of draft-eligible men served in uniform during WWII?"

It would also be interesting to know how many women served in the uniformed forces, and what percentage of the age 18-65 women's population they were.
12th Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not to mention Joe. And Barry. And Bill. And a vast majority of other people: one doesn't need to get murdered, robbed or raped to have an opinion on murder, robbery and rape. Furthermore, a DD-214 isn't some golden amulet bestowing all-knowing, von Clausewitz-like powers and immunity from dumba55ery on its bearer. I met the smartest -and dumbest- people I've ever known while I was in the Navy.
JABQ04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Freaking brilliant. Should have done that when I was den leader and then cub master
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Infantry said:

UTExan: When my son was in Cub Scouts, I was a Den Leader. When the boys got restless, we did 3-to-5 second rushes, bounding overwatch, and assault through ambush drills.

When I was a boy scout, our assistant scoutmaster was an ex-marine.

I don't know if it is normal in most boy scout troops, but in ours, standing at attention in an evenly spaced row was normal.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.