Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

Yeah, but the left says the same about the right when the right votes whoever the left is calling a "fascist" so I see that as a wash.

Where the right beats out the left, though, is when their fringe (far-far-faaar) right folks still fall in line and vote for the GOP candidate regardless.

The left's fringe eff'tards don't do that. They take their feels and vote third-party candidate or stay home.

At least you guys stay united in the end,

No Spin Ag said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

Yeah, but the left says the same about the right when the right votes whoever the left is calling a "fascist" so I see that as a wash.

Where the right beats out the left, though, is when their fringe (far-far-faaar) right folks still fall in line and vote for the GOP candidate regardless.

The left's fringe eff'tards don't do that. They take their feels and vote third-party candidate or stay home.

At least you guys stay united in the end,

---

Well, I don't really care what the left says about the "far right" because the far right is a myth in this country. It doesn't exist in any numbers that matter. Meanwhile, we have open communists who are on record hating the USA winning Dem primaries and general elections in multiple blue areas across the country.

Furthermore, anyone that is to the right of Mao is considered far right by these people. There is no "both sides" in this discussion. There are the Democrats who are rapidly adopting the evil of communism and then there is the rest of us.

Now, what could ultimately happen is a self-fulfilling prophecy where the left in this country manifests Fascism into reality as a cure for the disease of leftism.

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

Yeah, but the left says the same about the right when the right votes whoever the left is calling a "fascist" so I see that as a wash.

Where the right beats out the left, though, is when their fringe (far-far-faaar) right folks still fall in line and vote for the GOP candidate regardless.

The left's fringe eff'tards don't do that. They take their feels and vote third-party candidate or stay home.

At least you guys stay united in the end,

---

Well, I don't really care what the left says about the "far right" because the far right is a myth in this country. It doesn't exist in any numbers that matter. Meanwhile, we have open communists who are on record hating the USA winning Dem primaries and general elections in multiple blue areas across the country.

Furthermore, anyone that is to the right of Mao is considered far right by these people. There is no "both sides" in this discussion. There are the Democrats who are rapidly adopting the evil of communism and then there is the rest of us.

Now, what could ultimately happen is a self-fulfilling prophecy where the left in this country manifests Fascism into reality as a cure for the disease of leftism.

Absolutely!! And they are energetic!!

---

As bad as these numbers are, I'm sure they're even worse in NYC. The democrats are lost and NYC is beyond hopeless.

The hour is later than you think pic.twitter.com/mnRH2NfQn9

— Adam Singer (@AdamSinger) June 24, 2026

Probably a post for the R&P board but what the hell.

This is all starting to feel a bit ominous isn't it.? It may not be one person, but a group of people, rising from the east. Whispering in the ears of those who are vulnerable with venom and making it taste like sugar.

This is a rapid change in our country. This is happening so much faster than anyone could imagine, and, to me, I can't help but think there's something darker to all of this. It just feels like the curd and whey are being separated in this world. Lines are being drawn in the sand

Yeah, the speed at which its happening - which is mind boggling - points to a spiritual cause, imo.

Logos Stick said:

---

Enviroag02 said:

---

At least one is actually ON RECORD saying she seeks to eradicate western civilization. The person who said that was just elected. This is lunacy!

---

yes, this lady:

Darializa Avila Chevalier (NY-13)

the one with the big glasses.

---

What a resume. Middle Eastern Studies undergrad and a doctoral student in Sociology. Community activist as an investigator for a public legal aid org.

This is all it takes to get into congress these days.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

No, this is the future of the Democratic party now. It's not contained to NYC, it's also Seattle, Los Angeles, etc. San Francisco ironically seems to have escaped lunacy orbit with Mayor Lurie. It's hard to undo what decades of bad governance and neglect have done.

Structurally, I think it's lazy to blame this on immigrants. This is a result of the young being priced out of the American Dream. They are angry and will listen to anyone who tells them if you just tax the wealthy and businesses more your life will get better. This is of course doomed to fail, but it's easy politics. Where I think I'll get more pushback from this board is I view MAGA and Trumpism from roughly the same prism.

But back to your point, I think we should be cleareyed about where momentum is in politics, and it is currently with those who's policy choices would further hurt rather than improve America.

mm98 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Enviroag02 said:

---

At least one is actually ON RECORD saying she seeks to eradicate western civilization. The person who said that was just elected. This is lunacy!

---

yes, this lady:

Darializa Avila Chevalier (NY-13)

the one with the big glasses.

---

What a resume. Middle Eastern Studies undergrad and a doctoral student in Sociology. Community activist as an investigator for a public legal aid org.

This is all it takes to get into congress these days.

---

I'd bet a huge amount that the "public legal aid org" she worked for was being funded by USAID.

aggiedent said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

aggiedent said:

---

SunrayAg said:

---

New York is not an American city. There are no New Yorkers left there.

---

What does that mean? Seriously, New York for the last 200+ years has been a city of immigrants constantly in flux. I think what you mean, is that it's a different subset of immigrants infusing into the mix.

---

At what point do we become America and not a nation of immigrants. I guess we will never have our own values, culture, etc... I'd think that after 250 years we would, but apparently not. It seems that for about 220 years we did, but per you, we did not.

---

Have you ever lived in New York?

My dad worked for Shell Oil and we lived in 6 different states, including 3 years in New York, back in the day Shell's US HQ's was there before relocating to Houston. Other spots included the San Fran Bay Area, the Chicago area, and the St. Louis area.

Many of these places do have an identity……….an observable culture or set of cultures. Houston does. San Fran does. New York………It's such a massive and diverse set of people, to me, it's just different. It's like a 100 cities within a city. It's kinda like the whole world and its religions and cultures in one area. Always has been.

If you think i'm wrong let me ask you this. How would you describe the NY Culture and values of the 1970's…….80's……90's…..etc. How does it differ from today?

---

At this point, why anyone would want to live there is a complete mystery!

ArbAg said:

---

aggiedent said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

aggiedent said:

---

SunrayAg said:

---

New York is not an American city. There are no New Yorkers left there.

---

What does that mean? Seriously, New York for the last 200+ years has been a city of immigrants constantly in flux. I think what you mean, is that it's a different subset of immigrants infusing into the mix.

---

At what point do we become America and not a nation of immigrants. I guess we will never have our own values, culture, etc... I'd think that after 250 years we would, but apparently not. It seems that for about 220 years we did, but per you, we did not.

---

Have you ever lived in New York?

My dad worked for Shell Oil and we lived in 6 different states, including 3 years in New York, back in the day Shell's US HQ's was there before relocating to Houston. Other spots included the San Fran Bay Area, the Chicago area, and the St. Louis area.

Many of these places do have an identity……….an observable culture or set of cultures. Houston does. San Fran does. New York………It's such a massive and diverse set of people, to me, it's just different. It's like a 100 cities within a city. It's kinda like the whole world and its religions and cultures in one area. Always has been.

If you think i'm wrong let me ask you this. How would you describe the NY Culture and values of the 1970's…….80's……90's…..etc. How does it differ from today?

---

At this point, why anyone would want to live there is a complete mystery!

---

My daughter lives there. And I try to figure that out all of the time. Just absolutely crazy for any productive citizen to have residence in NYC.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Leftist activists are very good in primaries. Then their robotic team Dem voters only have the nutball as a choice in the general. That's how you get d at one of these lunatics in office.

---

Same as the Rs.

Regarding the socialism wing of the Dem Party, we don't need socialism.

But we also should not accept the 1875-1932 Gilded Age version of plutocratic capitalism we're currently in.

What we need in the USA is a return to 1933-1980 capitalism that was intentionally structured and regulated to build and sustain a very large middle class.

We have been moving away from that principle since 1981.

AGinHI said:

---

Quote:

---

Darializa Avila Chevalier (NY-13): Abolish prisons, abolish ICE, abolish borders, defund the police, and "all deportations are wrong", including for violent criminals. She has called the U.S. an "effing disgrace", and said in a prior social media post "I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me."

---

New York's 13th Congressional District which includes East Harlem, Washington Heights, and parts of the Bronx.

Demographics:

Hispanic/Latino: ~51% - 54%
Black/African American: ~23% - 30%
White: ~4% - 15%
Asian: ~5%

Foreign-Born: About 35% of the district's population was born outside the United States.
Income & Poverty: With a median household income roughly around $48,000 and a high poverty rate (near 28%)

This is what the Great Replacement looks like. These people are not just un-American; they are ignorant and stupid anti-American communists voting for communist demagogues.

---

Darializa Chevalier lost the Bronx part of the district by 30 points. She also lost predominantly Black and Hispanic areas, and she lost lower income areas by 10 points. She won with young voters and higher income voters, and won majority college educated areas by 20 points. https://t.co/brFok94vge pic.twitter.com/2O0Zks9O3h

— Batya Ungar-Sargon (@bungarsargon) June 24, 2026

Cross tabs say otherwise

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

The hour is later than you think pic.twitter.com/mnRH2NfQn9

— Adam Singer (@AdamSinger) June 24, 2026

---

It's even later than that.

Poetica coffee shop in Brooklyn has (quite illegally) banned Democratic congressman Dan Goldman because he is Jewish. He is critical of Netanyahu but that's not enough for these lunatics.

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

I have looked in the mirror and I'm not a communist. I'm normal. Voting for a communist is an automatic no go for me.

Not sure I get your point.

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

Comment makes no sense.
Either that, or you don't understand how mirrors work.

K2-HMFIC said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

Quote:

---

Darializa Avila Chevalier (NY-13): Abolish prisons, abolish ICE, abolish borders, defund the police, and "all deportations are wrong", including for violent criminals. She has called the U.S. an "effing disgrace", and said in a prior social media post "I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me."

---

New York's 13th Congressional District which includes East Harlem, Washington Heights, and parts of the Bronx.

Demographics:

Hispanic/Latino: ~51% - 54%
Black/African American: ~23% - 30%
White: ~4% - 15%
Asian: ~5%

Foreign-Born: About 35% of the district's population was born outside the United States.
Income & Poverty: With a median household income roughly around $48,000 and a high poverty rate (near 28%)

This is what the Great Replacement looks like. These people are not just un-American; they are ignorant and stupid anti-American communists voting for communist demagogues.

---

Darializa Chevalier lost the Bronx part of the district by 30 points. She also lost predominantly Black and Hispanic areas, and she lost lower income areas by 10 points. She won with young voters and higher income voters, and won majority college educated areas by 20 points. https://t.co/brFok94vge pic.twitter.com/2O0Zks9O3h

— Batya Ungar-Sargon (@bungarsargon) June 24, 2026

Cross tabs say otherwise

---

The voting outcomes in these crosstabs are separate than percentage of foreign born. I think you are conflating two different things?

Regardless, these demo outcomes for her are almost exactly like Mamdani's win.

The no life experience young and the highly mis-educated via our leftist indoctrination colleges got her over the finish line.

YouBet said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

I have looked in the mirror and I'm not a communist. I'm normal. Voting for a communist is an automatic no go for me.

Not sure I get your point.

---

His thought is you voted for Trump, who is a Nazi loving facial because you didn't want to vote for woman of color and that you're racist…Did I get that right, D*****Ag?

UntoldSpirit said:

---

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

The hour is later than you think pic.twitter.com/mnRH2NfQn9

— Adam Singer (@AdamSinger) June 24, 2026

---

It's even later than that.

---

they don't even know what socialism truly is. They see it as an ideal and that it sounds good because their professors and text books make it sound magical. ****ing idiots.

YouBet said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

I have looked in the mirror and I'm not a communist. I'm normal. Voting for a communist is an automatic no go for me.

Not sure I get your point.

---

Trump is a "fascist" and you vote for him...

that's his point.

Aggie95 said:

---

UntoldSpirit said:

---

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

The hour is later than you think pic.twitter.com/mnRH2NfQn9

— Adam Singer (@AdamSinger) June 24, 2026

---

It's even later than that.

---

they don't even know what socialism truly is. They see it as an ideal and that it sounds good because their professors and text books make it sound magical. ****ing idiots.

---

I kid you not. In Austin ISD, the history teacher spend 2 weeks talking about Mao and Red China, and all of Mao's ideals, never ONCE covering the fact that 20 million people were killed under him - until my son had the courage to bring it up.

Commies everywhere.

Good for NY! Hope they get what they voted for, good and hard.

Logos Stick said:

---

YouBet said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

I have looked in the mirror and I'm not a communist. I'm normal. Voting for a communist is an automatic no go for me.

Not sure I get your point.

---

Trump is a "fascist" and you vote for him...

that's his point.

---

Well then posters knowledge of mirrors, pretty much mirrors his knowledge of economics and history.

YouBet said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

I have looked in the mirror and I'm not a communist. I'm normal. Voting for a communist is an automatic no go for me.

Not sure I get your point.

---

The rightwing's extremist mindset, cult tribalism, extreme dishonesty, and extreme hypocrisy is the other side of the same coin.

And yet most of the middle right will still vote for a corrupt extremist far righty because (R).

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

I have looked in the mirror and I'm not a communist. I'm normal. Voting for a communist is an automatic no go for me.

Not sure I get your point.

---

The rightwing's extremist mindset, cult tribalism, extreme dishonesty, and extreme hypocrisy is the other side of the same coin.

---

What extremist mindset? And where is this extremist mindset winning numerous elections where they are the other side of same coin as the communists in NYC, Seattle, and LA?

Democrats broke the damn mold on hypocrisy although I won't argue there isn't dishonesty and hypocrisy by Republicans. It's nowhere near the level of where the mainstream Democrats are going though. Surely, you are not suggesting "both sides"?

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Muy said:

---

The left will think this is reflective of the rest of America.

---

Only the rabid left.

The ones in the middle-left know what happened in New York is like ultra-maga winning in deep red areas.

And even if these three win, they're all of three. At best, they're the new "Squad," which in the real world means nothing when ALL the votes are tallied.

Every new lib is the next worst (fill in the blank), but these three are as likely to get anything actually changed in the exact way they want as we are. Hell, we'd have a better chance if I really think about it.

---

And yet the middle left would still vote for the communist if given a choice between a communist or a person because (D).

---

look in the mirror

---

I have looked in the mirror and I'm not a communist. I'm normal. Voting for a communist is an automatic no go for me.

Not sure I get your point.

---

The rightwing's extremist mindset, cult tribalism, extreme dishonesty, and extreme hypocrisy is the other side of the same coin.

And yet most of the middle right will still vote for a corrupt extremist far righty because (R).

---

If being pro America and America first makes me an extremist, cult tribalist, extremely dishonest, and extremely hypocritical, especially in the eyes of commies,

then ****ing bring it on.

TresPuertas said:

---

Probably a post for the R&P board but what the hell.

This is all starting to feel a bit ominous isn't it.? It may not be one person, but a group of people, rising from the east. Whispering in the ears of those who are vulnerable with venom and making it taste like sugar.

This is a rapid change in our country. This is happening so much faster than anyone could imagine, and, to me, I can't help but think there's something darker to all of this. It just feels like the curd and whey are being separated in this world. Lines are being drawn in the sand

---

it is not some type of unique religious awakening

People like me were WARNING ABOUT THIS FOR YEARS

when the population starts to turn against the Jews- it's the canary in the coal mine and pretty soon everyone else is going down as well.

for YEARS since 9/11 we were warning the West and the USA not to allow millions of invading Muslims into the countries.

now you see the results-

no one like Mamdani existed outside Uganda until the US government/leftists let in millions of immigrants who do not share our cultural values