Is Keir Starmer's Time As PM Finally Up?

7,250 Views | 78 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by annie88
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burnham's win last night has added fuel to the fire and there had been a lot of talk that if he won, Keir's days would be numbered. Add on the gang rape report and it seems like the fire that will burn down the house of Starmer may go full inferno.



Quote:

EXCLUSIVE:

* Cabinet ministers will this afternoon tell Sir Keir Starmer to set out a timeline for his departure in the wake of Andy Burnham's by-election victory in Makerfield

* The prime minister is holding a series of meetings and calls with ministers and Labour MPs. The Times has been told that 'multiple' cabinet ministers will tell him that his "time is up". Senior figures in No 10 are also telling Starmer it is time to go

* Starmer insists he is going nowhere. He is planning to use the calls to make the case for his Premiership and try to shore up support

* His pitch is twofold: 1) A contest will tear the party apart and 2) We are delivering - NHS waiting lists are falling, the number of small boat crossings is down, legal migration if falling. 'The worst thing we can do is take our foot off the gas'

* Cabinet ministers say there is no route through this. It's about accepting political reality and leaving with dignity

* We're now locked in a debilitating stalemate. Neither Andy Burnham nor Keir Starmer wants a leadership contest, for very different reasons - Burnham because he favours a coronation, Starmer because he wants to stay in power and believes a challenge will rip the party apart

* Starmer is insisting he will fight any challenge. Allies say he has a 100,000 war-chest and all the infrastructure -including key staffers, campaign literature etc - in place. He is ready to go

* Burnham allies think Number 10 has lost contact with reality. They argue that on any measure it is over for Starmer and that he should accept reality and stand down. They accuse him on to power and say his position is untenable

* It looks increasingly like Burnham and Starmer may not talk until next week. As per @PronouncedAlva Burnham has his list of nominations ready to go - 200+ - and is prepared to hand them over to Starmer to pressure him into going

* The situation is clearly unsustainable. So how will the deadlock be broken? First, pressure from backbenchers - 100 Labour MPs have now called for him to go. That number will only rise this weekend

* Second, pressure from Cabinet ministers as above. But here's the rub - we have been here before and he has just ignored them. Shabana Mahmood, Ed Miliband, John Healey, Wes Streeting... the list is getting longer and longer. We are somewhere between a rock and a hard place.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Starmer is a left wing totalitarian. Of course he doesn't want to step down.

Isn't Makerfield mentioned quite a bit in the Rape Gang report? Thought I saw that there.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is the gang rape thing getting any air time at all on London and UK media?
Where is the King? The King should be using whatever power he has under their constitution to toss the PM on his arse.
Starmer needs to be tar'd and feathered on the street in front of Winchester. (well that would be a good start... I still say he should be hanged inside Tower of London.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He should be removed with charges of treason
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Time for the next British lover of muzzie rape gangs


What a wonderful place Britain has become
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pichael Thompson said:

Time for the next British lover of muzzie rap gangs


What a wonderful place Britain has become


Culturally enriched.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pichael Thompson said:

Time for the next British lover of muzzie rape gangs


What a wonderful place Britain has become

It is NO Different here. If this happened in America, there are people on this board, who will rationalize it. We all know how they are

They rationalized "learing" centers
They rationalized Karmelo Anthony
They rationalized 3 assassination attempts on POTUS.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes. There will be a leadership contest, and Burnham will win, then he will probably call an election in the Fall. Labour might lose 100 seats, but it might retain a small majority, or be the biggest party in a left wing coalition. Farage's party missed an opportunity by not having a good candidate, and the fringe group took 7% of the vote, too, so it ended up not being close. If that is repeated across the country, Labour could win an outright majority in a general election.
Vitani
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It feels like every three weeks or so we have a new thread about his time being up yet he is still there.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Pichael Thompson said:

Time for the next British lover of muzzie rape gangs


What a wonderful place Britain has become

In 80 years they went from Churchill refusing to bow down to fascism to becoming a fascist state.
DCPD158
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I read that Burnham is left of Starmer politically
Company I-1, Ord-Ords '85 -12thFan and Websider-
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DCPD158 said:

I read that Burnham is left of Starmer politically


Looked him up. So, he's still a dumbass economically but then almost everyone over there is regardless of party affiliation. They are all socialists with the only real difference being how they approach immigration.

Quote:

One reason Burnham has attracted attention is that he combines traditionally left-leaning Labour economics with a somewhat tougher stance on issues like immigration and regional identity than some Labour politicians, giving him appeal beyond Labour's core voters.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DCPD158 said:

I read that Burnham is left of Starmer politically

Probably a fair assessment, but, unlike Starmer, he does have something that resembles a spine, and may actually make a few hard choices. But, then again, maybe not. Certainly, he will try to avoid that before an election.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
'Somewhat tougher stance on immigration' had me laughing out loud. That's not the answer, Brits.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

'Somewhat tougher stance on immigration' had me laughing out loud. That's not the answer, Brits.


We will take 1M Muslims instead of 1.3M Muslims.
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
more likely he is suicided at this point. they can't have that man talking, and he is straight up terrified right now.
CrockerAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the Rape Gang report is being reported in some news, but being taken with a grain of salt.

I believe there were three reports being completed but different groups.

The one just released is primarily driven by the Restore Party (to the right of Nigel Farage Reform Party). Crazy policies like ending and reversing immigration, clamping down on asylum, etc. have earned them a reputation as extremists.

I would imagine a great deal, if not all of the report, is accurate. The faction publishing that particular report gives them some cover to say it's sensationalized.

YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CrockerAg98 said:

I think the Rape Gang report is being reported in some news, but being taken with a grain of salt.

I believe there were three reports being completed but different groups.

The one just released is primarily driven by the Restore Party (to the right of Nigel Farage Reform Party). Crazy policies like ending and reversing immigration, clamping down on asylum, etc. have earned them a reputation as extremists.

I would imagine a great deal, if not all of the report, is accurate. The faction publishing that particular report gives them some cover to say it's sensationalized.




I think you meant sane and justified and not crazy? Doing the opposite of that is cultural suicide.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:

Is the gang rape thing getting any air time at all on London and UK media?
Where is the King? The King should be using whatever power he has under their constitution to toss the PM on his arse.
Starmer needs to be tar'd and feathered on the street in front of Winchester. (well that would be a good start... I still say he should be hanged inside Tower of London.


Per family there, not reported on at all. Even reading stuff online about it could get you arrested there.
CrockerAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

CrockerAg98 said:

I think the Rape Gang report is being reported in some news, but being taken with a grain of salt.

I believe there were three reports being completed but different groups.

The one just released is primarily driven by the Restore Party (to the right of Nigel Farage Reform Party). Crazy policies like ending and reversing immigration, clamping down on asylum, etc. have earned them a reputation as extremists.

I would imagine a great deal, if not all of the report, is accurate. The faction publishing that particular report gives them some cover to say it's sensationalized.




I think you meant sane and justified and not crazy? Doing the opposite of that is cultural suicide.

I don't pay enough for emojis to imply sarcasm. 100% sane and justified.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CrockerAg98 said:

YouBet said:

CrockerAg98 said:

I think the Rape Gang report is being reported in some news, but being taken with a grain of salt.

I believe there were three reports being completed but different groups.

The one just released is primarily driven by the Restore Party (to the right of Nigel Farage Reform Party). Crazy policies like ending and reversing immigration, clamping down on asylum, etc. have earned them a reputation as extremists.

I would imagine a great deal, if not all of the report, is accurate. The faction publishing that particular report gives them some cover to say it's sensationalized.




I think you meant sane and justified and not crazy? Doing the opposite of that is cultural suicide.

I don't pay enough for emojis to imply sarcasm. 100% sane and justified.


Ah. Sorry. lol.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Already a thread (or two)

Starmer May Be Done This Week

Looks Like Keir Starmer Is Out

I'm Gipper
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

nortex97 said:

'Somewhat tougher stance on immigration' had me laughing out loud. That's not the answer, Brits.


We will take 1M Muslims instead of 1.3M Muslims.

And allow them to only rape women over 18. Maybe 14.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've taken the kids to the UK and France two times now. They will be able to give their kids first hand knowledge of each before the caliphate.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Things will not get any better under Burnham if he takes over Labour. He's a far left wing con artist.

Quote:

Burnham is seen as a political shape-shifter. He spent his formative years working under centrist Labour prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. The party and Burnham then shifted left under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn. In 2017, Burnham moved to Manchester and reinvented himself as a jovial left-wing metro mayorManchester's precursor to Mamdani.

Critics say that Burnham has blown with the prevailing political winds over his four-decade career. A well-worn joke in Westminster goes like this: "A Blairite, a Brownite and a Corbynite walk into a bar. The barman asks: 'What are you having, Andy?' "


He was for the following while campaigning as a leftist but then moved to the "center" to fight off Reform Party. That simply means he's now lying and will absolutely go back to his far left wing desires:

Quote:

He has called for mass nationalization of utilities, for the U.K.'s electoral system to be overhauled and for Britain to rejoin the European Union.

He recognized that the nation's finances are too constrained for large-scale nationalizations and said Britain isn't going to rejoin the EU soon. And, after Reform called him "open borders Andy" during the recent campaign, he started talking tougher on immigration.

"I've been trying to discern an economic philosophy and haven't really succeeded," said John Springford, an economist at the Center for European Reform think tank.

He pledged to focus on bread-and-butter issues like household bills to take the heat out of the immigration debate. "Everyone's impacted by the cost of living, and it gets us away from some of this divisive politics," he said, citing New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, whom Burnham admires.


I mean, look at this beta:


BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
he gone

TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The rumors are growing louder



It shocked me to see how hated he was even on Clarkson's Farm this season
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Socialist are never done, they just change their appearance.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buh bye!
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is going to be like the Chicago mayor outcome where everyone got so fed up with Beetlejuice's far left incompetence that they replaced her with someone who was just as far left and incompetent.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agsrback12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is the replacement another establishment stooge?
Deputy Travis Junior
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

This is going to be like the Chicago mayor outcome where everyone got so fed up with Beetlejuice's far left incompetence that they replaced her with someone who was just as far left and incompetent.


From what I've seen on Twitter, this is what's on tap. Everyone in line to replace him is as bad or somehow even worse. So while Starmer's sacking will give one ******* his just desserts, it's not going to fix anything.

The Chicago comparison is perfect.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many times have we heard this before?
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.