Children Regressing in Ability Due To Screen Time

3,649 Views | 72 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by eric76
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

BonfireNerd04 said:

The good thing about the youth being smartphone zombies is that now you can be autistic without looking weird.

It's the parents that are zombies.

Why the "cellphone bans" in schools have little effect and are a dumb idea.

Like taking out cokes and candy bars from schools was going to make kids less fat. It's bad parenting, not bad kids and tech companies.


I disagree, and I dont really think it's an apt comparison to weight loss.

People who are in an environment to lose weight...let's say, at the gym, don't get cokes and candy bars there. It works against what they're working towards.

Kids are at school to learn, and tangentially, to develop socially. They aren't learning or being social when distracted by the devices...that's plainly obvious. And I've heard teacher after teacher espousing the virtues of removing phones....more interaction in class, better questions, better social skills, etc.

If you have a kid with a phone, you know how much of an 'attention magnet' they are. A very simple experiment bears that out. Have a family meal with phones, and have one without phones, and tell me there isn't a giant difference...and that's in a relaxed setting. Now apply that same experiment to a task, like school, where attention is required.

Now I do agree parents are to blame as well...and they should set a much better example at home. But when the kids are at school, the parents can't control the situation, so it benefits the kids, for the schools to remove electronics.

AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

doubledog said:

aggiehawg said:

doubledog said:

It is not a broken education system, or do nothing parents.

Then what are the causes and contributing factors, in your mind, for this regression over the last generation?

Our generation is was TV, my father's generation it was the Radio, Jazz and Swing.

It is complicated, a simple "screen" time excuse will not suffice.

Okay fair point but there is a fact between those generations before screen time and that is the improvement of each generation in skills, knowledge, IQ over the 20th Century. Radio and TV did not adversely affect that progress.

Post smartphones, there has been a regression.

Yep.

And TVs stayed in the house. If you wanted to do anything else, you had to go away from it.

Phones are with people 24/7 now. You can now take all the distractions, from all past generations with you everywhere (tv, radio, etc)...and use them constantly.

I don't know the solution, but it's an issue.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

eric76 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Screens arent making kids "dumber", but they are definitely fundamentally molding their brains to be different than the brains of any prior generation in human history.

There's definitely major downsides, and we are adamant about not getting smart phones for any of our kids until well into their HS years (oldest is 11 now), but there are also some notable benefits. At least for smart kids who are given limited and controlled access to screens/tablets, the sheer volume of knowledge they can possess at a given age compared to prior generations is REMARKABLE. My son had so many more facts rattling around in his head at any given age than anyone I knew when I was that age. He can school most adults by now on the two world wars. The 8-11 year old kids at his STEM academy can speak to adults fluently about really advanced topics for that age. And a lot of it is the ability to look up the answer to literally every question they have immediately.

I know someone who read an entire encyclopedia when he was a kid. All 19 (or however many volumes).

That sounds impressive until you talk to him a while and realize that he gained facts without understanding them.

For example, he shocked me by explaining that the rods of the eye are processed by one side of the brain and the cones of the eye are processed by the other side of the brain. I don't know where or how he came up with such nonsense.

I loaned him my copy of Gordon Shepherd's Neurobiology so he cold read up on the rods and cones and how the ganglions rearrange themselves (except for a degree of variation in albinos, which I don't think is covered in the book) and continue back to the visual cortex on each side of the brain and of the visual processing that goes on in the visual cortex.

I think that I convinced him otherwise on this one subject.

On other subjects, not so much. He maintains that the US contributed nothing to the war effort in World War II and that victory was entirely due to the Soviet Union. He believes that the Soviet Union earned the rightful control of Japan and that we stole it from them. He also believes that we should never have been in Hawaii and should never have fought Japan.

He has lots of facts, but he has tied them together in incomprehensible ways in his mind.

So he is stupid, got it

Yep.

He reached the pinnacle of stupidity last night. So stupid that it is possible that we may have to shut down our business at the end of the month.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.