annie88 said:

---

He was an idiot when he was in the Obama administration and he's an idiot now. Nothing has really changed. Just because he's not as much of a ****ing weirdo doesn't make him good.

---

I'm not saying he's good. I'm saying it's interesting to follow from a political gamesmanship perspective because of how he's approaching this vs the rest of the Dem field.

Jesus, y'all are wound tight. I'm not sure how else I can communicate that I do not support Rahm whatsoever. It's just an interesting story to follow to see how it will turn out.

That Rahm is considered to be a somewhat sane lefty is just a further indictment of how crazy the democrats have gotten.

I give Fetterman credit for standing up to his party, but his core policies are still that of a loon.

There are zero sane prominent democrats. Shapiro may be the closest, but they will never support him en masse.

aggie93 said:

---

His brother is the architect of Obamacare and wrote a book about how people should basically only be given hospice level care when they turn 75. Essentially if you are a potentially productive human you get the best health care, if you no longer can contribute we give you pain meds and let you die.

Rahm is the guy that truly politicized the Census like never before and gave the Dems the blueprint on it. He's an old school corrupt as hell Chicago politician.

---

. Corrupt and Chicago politician is redundant.

Children shouldn't be held accountable for the sins of their fathers.

But it is interesting to note his dad was part of a group that even Jewish orgs branded a terrorist organization for their attacks on civilians and bombings of places like the King David Hotel.

MRB10 said:

---

Considering we're talking about tax payer funded medicine… I don't hate this.

"Essentially if you are a potentially productive human you get the best health care, if you no longer can contribute we give you pain meds and let you die."

---

What about all the non-productive people in this country who (regardless of their working age) don't contribute to our federal government?

panhandlefarmer said:

---

Megyn Kelly said on the Shawn Ryan show she could vote for him. This feud with Trump on the right is very revealing. Rahm is definitely a leftist masquerading as a moderate Democrat.

---

Just listened to that one. She came across as fairly juvenile in some opinions. Shawn came across as unresearched and butthurt too. The right is definitely fractured.

The sooner this war ends, the better.

And F Raymond Emmanuel. He's a different version of Obama.

Orlando Ayala Cant Read said:

---

If John Ossoff can close out his senate win in November, it'll be him vs Newsom for the ticket lead.

---

The Democrats are not nominating a Jew, to be honest I doubt the GOP would either. I personally think that's the dumbest reason (or certainly one of the dumbest) but it's reality. You can scratch Ossoff, Emmanuel, and Shapiro.

Tex100 said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

His brother is the architect of Obamacare and wrote a book about how people should basically only be given hospice level care when they turn 75. Essentially if you are a potentially productive human you get the best health care, if you no longer can contribute we give you pain meds and let you die.

Rahm is the guy that truly politicized the Census like never before and gave the Dems the blueprint on it. He's an old school corrupt as hell Chicago politician.

---

. Corrupt and Chicago politician is redundant.

---

People seem to have forgotten that Rahm was the one who first said, "Never let a serious crisis go to waste" when he worked for Obama. That's just who he is.

aggie93 said:

---

Orlando Ayala Cant Read said:

---

If John Ossoff can close out his senate win in November, it'll be him vs Newsom for the ticket lead.

---

The Democrats are not nominating a Jew, to be honest I doubt the GOP would either. I personally think that's the dumbest reason (or certainly one of the dumbest) but it's reality. You can scratch Ossoff, Emmanuel, and Shapiro.

---

Kamala flat out said she wouldn't nominate a Jew as VP the first time out, and she may run again.

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

He was an idiot when he was in the Obama administration and he's an idiot now. Nothing has really changed. Just because he's not as much of a ****ing weirdo doesn't make him good.

---

I'm not saying he's good. I'm saying it's interesting to follow from a political gamesmanship perspective because of how he's approaching this vs the rest of the Dem field.

Jesus, y'all are wound tight. I'm not sure how else I can communicate that I do not support Rahm whatsoever. It's just an interesting story to follow to see how it will turn out.

---

I'm not wound tight at all.
The guy is a ****ing idiot who tries to sound like a bad ass, fails miserably, and then supports the same bull**** policies that the liberals do. He's no different from them.

But instead of supporting your position, you attacked a different opinion. Interesting. Sounds like you're a little high strung and sensitive yourself.

aggie93 said:

---

Tex100 said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

His brother is the architect of Obamacare and wrote a book about how people should basically only be given hospice level care when they turn 75. Essentially if you are a potentially productive human you get the best health care, if you no longer can contribute we give you pain meds and let you die.

Rahm is the guy that truly politicized the Census like never before and gave the Dems the blueprint on it. He's an old school corrupt as hell Chicago politician.

---

. Corrupt and Chicago politician is redundant.

---

People seem to have forgotten that Rahm was the one who first said, "Never let a serious crisis go to waste" when he worked for Obama. That's just who he is.

---

He's not the bad ass he thinks he is.

In a famous 1992 election night dinner involving George Stephanopoulos, Emanuel read off a list of political adversaries. With each name he reportedly pounded a steak knife into the table, shouting "Nat Landow! Dead! Cliff Jackson! Dead!"

I met him while he was COS. I was in Afghanistan when him and Obama came into the chow hall one night. He shook my hand and asked how long I'd been there. I said four months. He gave me a complete learing look from head to toe to head, then said, "It looks good on you."

He seriously tripped my gaydar.

91Challenger said:

---

I met him while he was COS. I was in Afghanistan when him and Obama came into the chow hall one night. He shook my hand and asked how long I'd been there. I said four months. He gave me a complete learing look from head to toe to head, then said, "It looks good on you."

He seriously tripped my gaydar.

---

leering*

Been reading about too many Somalis on here.

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

He was an idiot when he was in the Obama administration and he's an idiot now. Nothing has really changed. Just because he's not as much of a ****ing weirdo doesn't make him good.

---

I'm not saying he's good. I'm saying it's interesting to follow from a political gamesmanship perspective because of how he's approaching this vs the rest of the Dem field.

Jesus, y'all are wound tight. I'm not sure how else I can communicate that I do not support Rahm whatsoever. It's just an interesting story to follow to see how it will turn out.

---

I'm not wound tight at all.
The guy is a ****ing idiot who tries to sound like a bad ass, fails miserably, and then supports the same bull**** policies that the liberals do. He's no different from them.

But instead of supporting your position, you attacked a different opinion. Interesting. Sounds like you're a little high strung and sensitive yourself.

---

Wut? I posted the topic as a political interest topic and half the thread assumes I support him. And you made comment that I was saying he was good which I didnt.

Because I'm very well known on here after 25 years of posting as a left winger. Not.

91Challenger said:

---

I met him while he was COS. I was in Afghanistan when him and Obama came into the chow hall one night. He shook my hand and asked how long I'd been there. I said four months. He gave me a complete learing look from head to toe to head, then said, "It looks good on you."

He seriously tripped my gaydar.

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

He was an idiot when he was in the Obama administration and he's an idiot now. Nothing has really changed. Just because he's not as much of a ****ing weirdo doesn't make him good.

---

I'm not saying he's good. I'm saying it's interesting to follow from a political gamesmanship perspective because of how he's approaching this vs the rest of the Dem field.

Jesus, y'all are wound tight. I'm not sure how else I can communicate that I do not support Rahm whatsoever. It's just an interesting story to follow to see how it will turn out.

---

I'm not wound tight at all.
The guy is a ****ing idiot who tries to sound like a bad ass, fails miserably, and then supports the same bull**** policies that the liberals do. He's no different from them.

But instead of supporting your position, you attacked a different opinion. Interesting. Sounds like you're a little high strung and sensitive yourself.

---

Wut? I posted the topic as a political interest topic and half the thread assumes I support him. And you made comment that I was saying he was good which I didnt.

Because I'm very well known on here after 25 years of posting as a left winger. Not.

---

I never said you were a leftist. I legit don't know how you even came to that conclusion.

Simmer down, Bud

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

He was an idiot when he was in the Obama administration and he's an idiot now. Nothing has really changed. Just because he's not as much of a ****ing weirdo doesn't make him good.

---

I'm not saying he's good. I'm saying it's interesting to follow from a political gamesmanship perspective because of how he's approaching this vs the rest of the Dem field.

Jesus, y'all are wound tight. I'm not sure how else I can communicate that I do not support Rahm whatsoever. It's just an interesting story to follow to see how it will turn out.

---

I'm not wound tight at all.
The guy is a ****ing idiot who tries to sound like a bad ass, fails miserably, and then supports the same bull**** policies that the liberals do. He's no different from them.

But instead of supporting your position, you attacked a different opinion. Interesting. Sounds like you're a little high strung and sensitive yourself.

---

Wut? I posted the topic as a political interest topic and half the thread assumes I support him. And you made comment that I was saying he was good which I didnt.

Because I'm very well known on here after 25 years of posting as a left winger. Not.

---

I never said you were a leftist. I legit don't know how you even came to that conclusion.

Simmer down, Bud

---

Sure, lol.

Sid Farkas said:

---

Republicans should be begging Emmanuel to take back the party. Yes, he'd be harder to beat...but in the end, the Dems are eventually going to take back power. Who would we rather have in charge of the Dem party at that point? Mamdani & the Squad, or Emmanuel's Chicago mafia?...It's a close call, but civilization depends on not having the freaks anywhere near the levers of power. Ever.

---

All leftists are freaks, including him.

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

He was an idiot when he was in the Obama administration and he's an idiot now. Nothing has really changed. Just because he's not as much of a ****ing weirdo doesn't make him good.

---

I'm not saying he's good. I'm saying it's interesting to follow from a political gamesmanship perspective because of how he's approaching this vs the rest of the Dem field.

Jesus, y'all are wound tight. I'm not sure how else I can communicate that I do not support Rahm whatsoever. It's just an interesting story to follow to see how it will turn out.

---

I'm not wound tight at all.
The guy is a ****ing idiot who tries to sound like a bad ass, fails miserably, and then supports the same bull**** policies that the liberals do. He's no different from them.

But instead of supporting your position, you attacked a different opinion. Interesting. Sounds like you're a little high strung and sensitive yourself.

---

Wut? I posted the topic as a political interest topic and half the thread assumes I support him. And you made comment that I was saying he was good which I didnt.

Because I'm very well known on here after 25 years of posting as a left winger. Not.

---

I never said you were a leftist. I legit don't know how you even came to that conclusion.

Simmer down, Bud

---

Sure, lol.

---

You're gonna have to explain to me where I said you were a leftist. I'm sure you won't answer. Because I never said any such thing.

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

annie88 said:

---

He was an idiot when he was in the Obama administration and he's an idiot now. Nothing has really changed. Just because he's not as much of a ****ing weirdo doesn't make him good.

---

I'm not saying he's good. I'm saying it's interesting to follow from a political gamesmanship perspective because of how he's approaching this vs the rest of the Dem field.

Jesus, y'all are wound tight. I'm not sure how else I can communicate that I do not support Rahm whatsoever. It's just an interesting story to follow to see how it will turn out.

---

I'm not wound tight at all.
The guy is a ****ing idiot who tries to sound like a bad ass, fails miserably, and then supports the same bull**** policies that the liberals do. He's no different from them.

But instead of supporting your position, you attacked a different opinion. Interesting. Sounds like you're a little high strung and sensitive yourself.

---

Wut? I posted the topic as a political interest topic and half the thread assumes I support him. And you made comment that I was saying he was good which I didnt.

Because I'm very well known on here after 25 years of posting as a left winger. Not.

---

I never said you were a leftist. I legit don't know how you even came to that conclusion.

Simmer down, Bud

---

Sure, lol.

---

You're gonna have to explain to me where I said you were a leftist. I'm sure you won't answer. Because I never said any such thing.

---

Actually, it was this.

Quote:

---

And you made comment that I was saying he was good which I didnt.

---

Other comment was for rest of knee jerkers. It's a political interest thread and not me endorsing Rahm thread.

But this is dumb now. Back to point of thread it will be an interesting follow.

That's a bunch of bull**** but fine.