BigRobSA said:
flown-the-coop said:
Broseph said:
Yep, these are wooden 6x6 placed cross wise as they lift up the house. They do this in Galveston all the time.
We did a few of these in the Ike programs and steered away from these in Harvey programs. My pucker factor of putting a house on cribbing and in some cases we had to not just lift but shift… who doggy. BTW high-tech lubricant uses to slide houses on girders was none other than Dawn dish soap.
Competitor of hours was up in Jersey doing one of these and it toppled over. Killed a worker and severely damaged the adjacent home. Not a cheap problem.
You get a house that high and expect some level of motion sickness in high winds. We hit 20ft elevation on some and one in mid-twenties on the San Jac river north of Houston (new construction). You cannot cross brace as you need to maintain free flow of water underneath. Nuts.
All that bull**** or....move.
Hmmmm, I know what I'd choose.
Making people move from their flooded homes is racist.
They actually had a relo program as part of Harvey. The statemor local gubmit would offer a VDL sitting on their books and the homeowner would have new house on new lot and old house demolished and that lot put on the books.
Homeowners declined this as many are poor, elderly and staying within the community, church etc was too much to overcome. Some areas like the aforementioned Port Arthur and also in Texas City had to relocate as the existing home was in the defined blast zones. Floodways are also a no build zone.
Regardless, the lifting as per the OP is a gigantic waste of funds. And another is correct in that Nassau Bay is a honey-hole of these.