nortex97 said:

---

She really did fall from a coconut tree. Prove me wrong.

---

There is actually matter inside a coconut from a tree.
There is a vacuum in kamala's coconut. She is such a lightweight that gravity has no effect on her thus negating any potential impact with the ground (or reality) on her part.

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Has she considered voter suppression? Maybe a poll tax?

---

She really needs to suggest concentration camps.

Brutal Puffin said:

---

LOL. Truth is nothing but bad ideas have has ever come out of that "brain".

---

FIFY

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Has she considered voter suppression? Maybe a poll tax?

---

She really needs to suggest concentration camps.

---

Hillary effectively did so the precedent is already there.

This is not about Kamala, I don't think. This is the DNC probing to solidify coming election strategy. If they feel this approach energizes the base and not just the fringe, get ready to hear alot more of this. Much is said about TDS but that does not mean it can't be a winning strategy. Obama might have mopped the floor with the same TDS strategy that failed Kamala.

I'd wager they will not give the job to Kamala again. Perhaps they know she is already cooked (I wonder if she knows it?). So, the possibility of a majority revolt against SC packing, the statehood play, and aboloshing the EC serves little risk if Kamala is served as tribute. Very easy to dump her for a less radical set of ideas in this context and saddle up Gavin or whomever. By saying "no dumb ideas" the DNC are simultaniously creating an off ramp to seperate from horribly dumb ideas when/if they backfire. "We let everyone have a voice but obviously in doing so we do not agree with all of those voices". Pretty smart, actually. They are desperately trying to figure out if they can actually say what they intend to do, in my opinion.

I know Ds that speak against the crazy trans movement. I know Ds that call out the crazies who cheer political violence. I know Ds who acknowledge progress at the border and who might also support the current efforts to neutralize Iran. I have yet to see/hear a Democrat oppose SC, EC. and statehood. Curious if any of the Ds here take issue with any of them and are willing to say so.

My experience tells me the promise of "MAGA" being forever buried and the idea that Rs never gain power again are worthy of a "by any means necessary" approach.

Quote:

---

My experience tells me the promise of "MAGA" being forever buried and the idea that Rs never gain power again are worthy of a "by any means necessary" approach.

---

Would you care to rephrase that? Sounds insurrectiony.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

My experience tells me the promise of "MAGA" being forever buried and the idea that Rs never gain power again are worthy of a "by any means necessary" approach.

---

Would you care to rephrase that? Sounds insurrectiony.

---

No. Because it is. And, I did not support support it in anything I shared. I thought I was pretty clear but I am tired, so.

AgFan1974 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

My experience tells me the promise of "MAGA" being forever buried and the idea that Rs never gain power again are worthy of a "by any means necessary" approach.

---

Would you care to rephrase that? Sounds insurrectiony.

---

No. Because it is. And, I did not support support it in anything I shared. I thought I was pretty clear but I am tired, so.

---

Inserting "democrats believe" before the promise would clarify what you mean.

Yo Kamala

aggiehawg said:

---

Kamala Harris is now calling for Democrats to hold a “No Bad Idea Brainstorm” where they discuss:

- Abolishing the Electoral College
- Packing the Supreme Court
- Making Puerto Rico and D.C. states

“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating!” pic.twitter.com/23MPJxn7fN

— Pat Adams (@PatAdams96) May 14, 2026

Not sure what is worse. She admits they are bad ideas or her use of the word brainstorm.

---

C. Accusing the red states of cheating.

All those are bad ideas not to mention unconstitutional. And like most things Dems do not think through to the logical end and consequences / conclusion of their ideas.

None of that would have stopped Trump winning and he would have even more of a mandate; between his two terms he would have had more SCOTUS judges to nominate.

The Electoral College argument is that of a child. The natural and next iteration of that will be that flyover states should only have 1 Senator while NY and CA have 4 or 5…..

And yet, somehow, they still claim that Trump is the threat to democracy

Jarrin Jay said:

---

All those are bad ideas not to mention unconstitutional. And like most things Dems do not think through to the logical end and consequences / conclusion of their ideas.

None of that would have stopped Trump winning and he would have even more of a mandate; between his two terms he would have had more SCOTUS judges to nominate.

The Electoral College argument is that of a child. The natural and next iteration of that will be that flyover states should only have 1 Senator while NY and CA have 4 or 5…..

---

Well, TBF, packing the SCOTUS can be done legislatively by amending the Judiciary Act. SCOTUS cannot be abolished since it is specifically mentioned within the Constitution but no number of justices is specified. And the number of justices have varied over time.

aggiehawg said:

---

Kamala Harris is now calling for Democrats to hold a “No Bad Idea Brainstorm” where they discuss:

- Abolishing the Electoral College
- Packing the Supreme Court
- Making Puerto Rico and D.C. states

“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating!” pic.twitter.com/23MPJxn7fN

— Pat Adams (@PatAdams96) May 14, 2026

Not sure what is worse. She admits they are bad ideas or her use of the word brainstorm.

---

Kneepads got way to much enjoyment out of saying the word "penile-ize."

aggiehawg said:

---

Kamala Harris is now calling for Democrats to hold a “No Bad Idea Brainstorm” where they discuss:

- Abolishing the Electoral College
- Packing the Supreme Court
- Making Puerto Rico and D.C. states

“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating!” pic.twitter.com/23MPJxn7fN

— Pat Adams (@PatAdams96) May 14, 2026

Not sure what is worse. She admits they are bad ideas or her use of the word brainstorm.

---

You will be hearing from my lawyer. I hope you are proud of yourself, that was 1 minute and 33 seconds of my life I will never get back.

You were warned it was Kamala and dumb so by watching it that was assumption of the risk.

aggiehawg said:

---

You were warned it was Kamala and dumb so by watching it that was assumption of the risk.

---

Don't loop hole me.

It is possible that your attorney will make it possible for you to be unburdened by what has been.

The Ex Officio Director said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

You were warned it was Kamala and dumb so by watching it that was assumption of the risk.

---

Don't loop hole me.

---

You can argue that Kamala saying dumb s*** is an attractive nuisance, such as an unfenced swimming pool.

BQ78 said:

---

It is possible that your attorney will make it possible for you to be unburdened by what has been.

---

Made me spit out my red bull.

aggiehawg said:

---

The Ex Officio Director said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

You were warned it was Kamala and dumb so by watching it that was assumption of the risk.

---

Don't loop hole me.

---

You can argue that Kamala saying dumb s*** is an attractive nuisance, such as an unfenced swimming pool.

---

Kamala is that ex you block from all social media outlets and still manages to contact you. I feel I need to file a restraining order againts her.

Quote:

---

Kamala is that ex you block from all social media outlets and still manages to contact you. I feel I need to file a restraining order againts her.

---

Hard to look away from a train wreck, which she perpetually is...a train wreck.

That old expression "there's no such thing as a stupid question"? A Kamala brainstorming session would remove any doubts about how wrong that statement really is.

She probably had to form a committee to brainstorm the idea of using the word "brainstorm" in her pitch.

Gutfeld is talking about this on The Five.

aggiehawg said:

---

Jarrin Jay said:

---

All those are bad ideas not to mention unconstitutional. And like most things Dems do not think through to the logical end and consequences / conclusion of their ideas.

None of that would have stopped Trump winning and he would have even more of a mandate; between his two terms he would have had more SCOTUS judges to nominate.

The Electoral College argument is that of a child. The natural and next iteration of that will be that flyover states should only have 1 Senator while NY and CA have 4 or 5…..

---

Well, TBF, packing the SCOTUS can be done legislatively by amending the Judiciary Act. SCOTUS cannot be abolished since it is specifically mentioned within the Constitution but no number of justices is specified. And the number of justices have varied over time.

---

But here's the thing. Even if the dems were to win the Senate and the WH, they STILL wouldn't have the 60 requisite votes to pack SCOTUS. The only way her "'plan" would work would be to immediately eliminate the filibuster in order to pack the court.

She's telegraphing what the Dems will do once they get to power. The MINUTE they have the Senate at 50/50 or better, the House and the Presidency, you can bet your last dollar that the fillibuster WILL be gone.

So if the above statement is correct, the fillibuster is dead - the question is only when it dies. That is why I am amazed that Mitch, Tillis, Murkowski, & Collins won't vote to kill it in order to protect the election process... ie. the Save America Act.

They're going to have us all die on the hill of "protecting the fillibuster", and the dems will use a faulty election process to gain power and immediately kill it anyway. And then follow that by doing all of these "no bad ideas" to cement their power position.

Mark it down. It's coming.

jrdaustin said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Jarrin Jay said:

---

All those are bad ideas not to mention unconstitutional. And like most things Dems do not think through to the logical end and consequences / conclusion of their ideas.

None of that would have stopped Trump winning and he would have even more of a mandate; between his two terms he would have had more SCOTUS judges to nominate.

The Electoral College argument is that of a child. The natural and next iteration of that will be that flyover states should only have 1 Senator while NY and CA have 4 or 5…..

---

Well, TBF, packing the SCOTUS can be done legislatively by amending the Judiciary Act. SCOTUS cannot be abolished since it is specifically mentioned within the Constitution but no number of justices is specified. And the number of justices have varied over time.

---

But here's the thing. Even if the dems were to win the Senate and the WH, they STILL wouldn't have the 60 requisite votes to pack SCOTUS. The only way her "'plan" would work would be to immediately eliminate the filibuster in order to pack the court.

She's telegraphing what the Dems will do once they get to power. The MINUTE they have the Senate at 50/50 or better, the House and the Presidency, you can bet your last dollar that the fillibuster WILL be gone.

So if the above statement is correct, the fillibuster is dead - the question is only when it dies. That is why I am amazed that Mitch, Tillis, Murkowski, & Collins won't vote to kill it in order to protect the election process... ie. the Save America Act.

They're going to have us all die on the hill of "protecting the fillibuster", and the dems will use a faulty election process to gain power and immediately kill it anyway. And then follow that by doing all of these "no bad ideas" to cement their power position.

Mark it down. It's coming.

---

I am old school. I believe in the filibuster but the way it used to be. Speaking the whole time. So pardon me for being slightly squeamish about anyone abolishing it. But with such a narrow margin between R and D which will be there for the forseeable future, you are probably correct.

nortex97 said:

---

She really did fall from a coconut tree. Prove me wrong.

---

Why can I NOT STOP laughing at this?????

Come Out Roll said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

She really did fall from a coconut tree. Prove me wrong.

---

Why can I NOT STOP laughing at this?????

---

Because she actually said she didn't fall out of a coconut tree.

Man, she got dat southern black accent rollin'. Why do people insist on changing their accent per audience? Don't answer that…

BkYdPitmaster said:

---

Man, she got dat southern black accent rollin'. Why do people insist on changing their accent per audience? Don't answer that…

---

But I bet I can do a Jamaican accent better than she can since I have been in Jamaica a lot more than she has.

Yes, understood, that would not need a constitutional amendment but legislatively it would still be a similar process that will never happen.

The Dems are children and the Rs, many of them anyway, are pragmatic and thoughtful which is why they are hesitant to break the filibuster. But at least in the Senate there are still some thoughtful Dems.

The party that does that is opening an absolute S show of a Pandora's box and it will be the Wild West anything goes and there will be legislation passed and repealed and passed and repealed ad-nauseum every 4 years…

If the Dems has busted the filibuster to pass all their BS under Biden the first 12 months of 47 would have been absolutely wild and extreme to make the 15 months to date look like child's plays.

As it is the Dems can even bring themselves to realize that Trump is just having DHS/ICE enforce laws passed by CONGRESS….

Ag87H2O said:

---

Crazy how when the Republicans use tactics the Democrats have used for decades, it's all of a sudden considered cheating.

This kind of desperation tells you Republicans are squarely over the target.

---

What they're calling gerrymandering is just undoing the Dem gerrymandering of the past few decades.

Since they're openly saying it, the GOP should do it now as a defense ploy and make laws keeping states at 50 and SCOTUS at 9. Then pass a law stating that no laws can pass without 60 votes in the Senate.

Again, the left always accuses the right of doing what they themselves actually do.