CIA rescinds or revises 19 intelligence reports over political bias, bad tradecraft

4,066 Views | 46 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by Ellis Wyatt
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Say it ain't so! Our vaunted CIA professionals were corrupted by political bias? How could this be? In other news, water is wet.

https://justthenews.com/government/security/biased-spies-cia-rescinds-or-revises-19-intelligence-reports-over-political

Quote:

In a dramatic repudiation, CIA Director John Ratcliffe on Friday rescinded or revised 19 intelligence reports the agency produced dating back to the Obama era because they were politically biased or used poor spy tradecraft, including one analysis suggesting that women who pursue traditional motherhood were at danger of becoming violent extremists.

AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I blame Obama. This is what he meant when he said fundamental transformation. He had no respect for our institutions and corrupted them all with these idealogues. Piss on him and anyone who voted for him.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People need to read that real closely because it tells you who the Dems are really working for.

Stay at home moms to go along with Christain Nationalists. You know, the real enemies of America.

This was a coordinated attack on the pillars of Americanism, and it has marxisim written all over it.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's a toxic mix of wokeism, Marxism and DEI. And the next Dem Prez will fire it all back up again.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, the old white REMVE movement that no one has ever heard of. Liberals are delusional!

Quote:

We assess that female members have been emerging as key players of the transnational white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist (REMVE) movement, taking on diverse roles to advance white REMVE goals-including the white REMVE view of traditional motherhood-and successfully participating in newer roles in propaganda and recruitment," the CIA report also stated.

Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ulysses90 said:

Quote:

... including one analysis suggesting that women who pursue traditional motherhood were at danger of becoming violent extremists.



Shocking coming from the Godless left. Oh wait ...
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obama IS a piece of *****
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Yeah, the old white REMVE movement that no one has ever heard of. Liberals are delusional!

Quote:

We assess that female members have been emerging as key players of the transnational white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist (REMVE) movement, taking on diverse roles to advance white REMVE goals-including the white REMVE view of traditional motherhood-and successfully participating in newer roles in propaganda and recruitment," the CIA report also stated.




1984 propaganda. Incredible.
1981 Monte Carlo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Obama IS a piece of *****

Many of us were on here screaming from the rooftops when he started talking about "fundamental transformation". Taking the best country and force of good to ever exist in the world, and wanting to completely overhaul or transform it, should have been the ultimate red flag, but too many people were mesmerized by his mocha latte colored skin.

Tweaking things here and there in the pursuit of greatness is a good thing...but you don't take the 2011 or 2020 Alabama football team and just try to completely overhaul it...unless trying to destroy for nefarious purposes.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Obama IS a piece of *****

tHaT'S RaCisT!!
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Silent For Too Long said:

People need to read that real closely because it tells you who the Dems are really working for.

Stay at home moms to go along with Christain Nationalists. You know, the real enemies of America.

This was a coordinated attack on the pillars of Americanism, and it has marxisim written all over it.


It's more than that. It's a Satanic attack on the family.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.
NormanEH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well duh. Now try to consider the remote possibility of politically influenced Epstein "investigations"
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.

You don't have to trust them, you only have to read the assessments that were quoted to see the disgusting crap they were writing in the assessments.
Seems you didn't read the article and links.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're out of your depth.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.


Close your eyes and stick your fingers in your ears like a good little comrade.

This is why people like you still believe in insane things like Russian Collusion. Your cognitive dissonance just keeps working overtime.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.

Well, we could always trust unbiased people like Obama, Biden, Brennan, and Comey...

They've shown that they are VERY truthful...
You can turn off signatures, btw
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Yeah, the old white REMVE movement that no one has ever heard of. Liberals are delusional!

Quote:

We assess that female members have been emerging as key players of the transnational white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist (REMVE) movement, taking on diverse roles to advance white REMVE goals-including the white REMVE view of traditional motherhood-and successfully participating in newer roles in propaganda and recruitment," the CIA report also stated.




Meanwhile the most outspoken dangerous group to traditional American values is currently white liberal single and boss girl type women and these clowns wanted you to believe traditional mother roles were becoming extremist.
Aggie Spirit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wonder how many of the laptop liars were involved.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.


When the alternative is to trust "the process" of the unaccountable civil service bureaucrats of the IC, I will trust appointees like Tulsi and reporters like John Solomon every time.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/historic-cia-retraction-intel-reports-exposes-rot-political-bias-obama

Quote:

One now-retracted intelligence assessment from the CIA from October 2021 the first year of Biden's presidency was titled "Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment." The intelligence product was "produced under the auspices of the Chief of Analysis" at the "Counterterrorism Mission Center."

The assessment cited a 2021 article by "An Injustice!" a seemingly defunct radical website hosted by Medium that described itself as "A new intersectional publication, geared towards voices, values, and identities! […] We speak to the intersectionality of identity and share the stories of those who bring all their selves into all their spaces."




Rocky Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ulysses90 said:

DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.


When the alternative is to trust "the process" of the unaccountable civil service bureaucrats of the IC, I will trust appointees like Tulsi and reporters like John Solomon every time.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/historic-cia-retraction-intel-reports-exposes-rot-political-bias-obama

Quote:

One now-retracted intelligence assessment from the CIA from October 2021 the first year of Biden's presidency was titled "Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment." The intelligence product was "produced under the auspices of the Chief of Analysis" at the "Counterterrorism Mission Center."

The assessment cited a 2021 article by "An Injustice!" a seemingly defunct radical website hosted by Medium that described itself as "A new intersectional publication, geared towards voices, values, and identities! […] We speak to the intersectionality of identity and share the stories of those who bring all their selves into all their spaces."







How many of these sources were produced by companies which were funded by NGOs to provide the raw material for the IC studies.

This isn't over. The people that want to destroy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are not going away.
Bluto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4stringAg said:

Logos Stick said:

Yeah, the old white REMVE movement that no one has ever heard of. Liberals are delusional!

Quote:

We assess that female members have been emerging as key players of the transnational white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist (REMVE) movement, taking on diverse roles to advance white REMVE goals-including the white REMVE view of traditional motherhood-and successfully participating in newer roles in propaganda and recruitment," the CIA report also stated.




Meanwhile the most outspoken dangerous group to traditional American values is currently white liberal single and boss girl type women and these clowns wanted you to believe traditional mother roles were becoming extremist.

Tell me about it. I have one in my Facebook feed, and she's so over the top with it. And she's a friend, or at least a friend of my wife's, but I actually like her. She doesn't talk politics to me in person, and we get along great. But the stuff she constantly spews on her socials is right out of the liberal talking points instructions program. Its been crazy to watch her go from conservative'ish/non-political to full blown caricature of white liberal single boss girl. And she's not longer single, and still over the top.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocky Rider said:

Ulysses90 said:

DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.


When the alternative is to trust "the process" of the unaccountable civil service bureaucrats of the IC, I will trust appointees like Tulsi and reporters like John Solomon every time.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/historic-cia-retraction-intel-reports-exposes-rot-political-bias-obama

Quote:

One now-retracted intelligence assessment from the CIA from October 2021 the first year of Biden's presidency was titled "Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment." The intelligence product was "produced under the auspices of the Chief of Analysis" at the "Counterterrorism Mission Center."

The assessment cited a 2021 article by "An Injustice!" a seemingly defunct radical website hosted by Medium that described itself as "A new intersectional publication, geared towards voices, values, and identities! […] We speak to the intersectionality of identity and share the stories of those who bring all their selves into all their spaces."




How many of these sources were produced by companies which were funded by NGOs to provide the raw material for the IC studies.

This isn't over. The people that want to destroy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are not going away.

So much this. And they are not hiding it either. Any vote for any democrat is a vote to enable the lawfare and sedition as waged by Susan Rice, Obama, Blinken, Brennan, Comey, Wray, Jake Sullivan, Mueller, etc. And yes they still use NGO's (often funded by Soros/Open Society groups and the CCP) to produce much of their material as with Fusion GPS etc. They view the whole russiagate model as a success, even if it didn't remove Trump it cost him a lot of support/power and could have played a role in facilitating the steal in 2020 as well.
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does the CIA still heavily recruit from the Ivy League? If so this is what you end up with.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be taken at face value.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgNav93 said:

I blame Obama. This is what he meant when he said fundamental transformation. He had no respect for our institutions and corrupted them all with these idealogues. Piss on him and anyone who voted for him.

He told us exactly what he was going to do and the useful idiots ate it up.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Silent For Too Long said:

People need to read that real closely because it tells you who the Dems are really working for.

Stay at home moms to go along with Christain Nationalists. You know, the real enemies of America.

This was a coordinated attack on the pillars of Americanism, and it has marxisim written all over it.

It's ****ing disgusting how much Sotero is worshipped still.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Silent For Too Long said:

People need to read that real closely because it tells you who the Dems are really working for.

Stay at home moms to go along with Christain Nationalists. You know, the real enemies of America.

This was a coordinated attack on the pillars of Americanism, and it has marxisim written all over it.

I mean when you had the head of the CIA who literally voted for the Communist Party nominee instead of Jimmy Carter (who apparently wasn't far enough left) then how is this a surprise?
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Obama IS a piece of *****

tHaT'S RaCisT!!

Racist? I thought he was being generous
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not arguing with you at all but the CIA has long been a large concern to me. When I read of George HW Bush' early involvement (of course later a director) and their activities foreign and domestic I just can't help but feel an enormous amount of distrust in the organization writ large, second only to our lovely FBI. Friendly note that he was a liaison officer to the PRC before becoming CIA director (appointed by Ford).


Unlike Bush, I think Brennan was merely a useful moron-idiot to put atop the beast, not a real director (sort of how Obama-Biden were only nominally POTUS, both idiots). He was never a spook, just a bureaucrat who managed to build up his friend-list on the left. He was never very good at even hiding his tracks too which is why he is presently facing so many problems.

Some names to keep an eye out for if he turns on them:
Quote:

What Brennan did not realize we would discover when he wrote the letter in 2022:

In December of 2016, President Obama turned to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and CIA Director John Brennan with a request to change the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) and blame the Russians for election interference in the prior presidential election. Brennan gave the task of assembling the fraudulent intel to a CIA analyst named Julia Gurganus.

Subsequently, inside the CIA the National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the Directorate of Analysis began working on a pretext that would create the impression for the misleading Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), as demanded by Obama, Clapper and Brennan ultimately constructed by Julia Gurganus.

Inside the National Intelligence Council, one of the key figures who helped create the ICA fabrication was a CIA analyst named Eric Ciaramella.

You might remember the name Eric Ciaramella from the 2019 impeachment effort against President Trump. However, in 2016/2017 Eric Ciaramella was a CIA deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasiaon the CIA's National Intelligence Council, at the time the fraudulent Intelligence Community Assessment was created.

Funny how some names pop up in the history of this crap in unexpected ways/places.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.

Well, we could always trust unbiased people like Obama, Biden, Brennan, and Comey...

They've shown that they are VERY truthful...


No disagreement there. My point is the same applies to the current Administration.

Trump, Vance, Stephen Miller, Bondi, Kash, Lutnick, Rollins, Bessent, Tulsi, Ratcliffe, Hegseth, and Bongino. They're corrupt as hell and extremely biased. They lie constantly. I haven't seen any reason to trust any of them.

And let's not forget there's still a 3rd faction, the "old guard" of traditional Establishment Republicans. They are on the wane, no longer in power in the federal government or even inside the GOP. But they plan to retake control of the GOP after Trump is gone. The old guard have always been corrupt, biased and dishonest, yet many Americans trusted them and believed in them. How did that work out for us? An invasion, war, and long occupation of Iraq done under false pretext. A Great Recession. TARP.

agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troll game is becoming weaker with every post
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90 said:

DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.


When the alternative is to trust "the process" of the unaccountable civil service bureaucrats of the IC, I will trust appointees like Tulsi and reporters like John Solomon every time.


There are additional alternatives to the two you listed.

When two factions are proven liars, the logical choice is to not trust either of them.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

Ulysses90 said:

DeschutesAg said:

If we can't trust unbiased people like Ratcliff, Tulsi, and John Solomon, then this nation is in deep trouble.


When the alternative is to trust "the process" of the unaccountable civil service bureaucrats of the IC, I will trust appointees like Tulsi and reporters like John Solomon every time.


There are additional alternatives to the two you listed.

When two factions are proven liars, the logical choice is to not trust either of them.

Disclose names of these marxist clowns.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You didn't name factions when you insinuated that they were untruthful are stating only the facts that support their partisan agenda. You named John Solomon, Tulsi Gabbard, and John Ratcliffe. Name something untruthful by fact or omission that is stated in this article.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.