Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Patel didn't name specific donors, financial institutions, or nonprofits,

---

There is no chance in hell he could have legally named them.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Patel didn't name specific donors, financial institutions, or nonprofits,

---

There is no chance in hell he could have legally named them.

---

I'd be shocked if Arabella (who's changed their name in the last two months), Ford, and Open Society aren't the three biggies involved, and also Reid Hoffman.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Patel didn't name specific donors, financial institutions, or nonprofits,

---

There is no chance in hell he could have legally named them.

---

Then why is he saying anything? This admin is nothing but wind.

TyHolden said:

---

just drone the Soros and Schwartz families and that will take care of most of it....

---

Guarantee they are just funneling offshore money

Soros doesn't spend his own money he just profits off the chaos he sows


Freaking demon that guy

The legal process is glacial. Always has been. They lose cases they rush. Any investigation not done properly risks spoiling evidence and then there's no hope of anyone ever being indicted.

Also, the left is loaded with lawyers and they are usually very careful to stay in gray areas or go right up to the line without crossing it, and to cover their tracks legally, or set up and then exploit loopholes.

TA-OP said:

---

I've consistently said Citizen's United needs to be addressed yesterday.

---

Of course you have. Libs hate free speech.

NormanEH said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Patel didn't name specific donors, financial institutions, or nonprofits,

---

There is no chance in hell he could have legally named them.

---

Then why is he saying anything? This admin is nothing but wind.

---

I feel certain you would be *****ing regardless.

Logos Stick said:

---

TA-OP said:

---

I've consistently said Citizen's United needs to be addressed yesterday.

---

Of course you have. Libs hate free speech.

---

I also think revisiting Citizen's United might not be a bad idea as the on the ground consequences of it have gone way further than expected. Having said that, putting that s*** back into the horse is probably futile.

OTOH, chipping away at NY Times v. Sullivan to place consequences for defamatory and prevarications in political speech.

aggiehawg said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

TA-OP said:

---

I've consistently said Citizen's United needs to be addressed yesterday.

---

Of course you have. Libs hate free speech.

---

I also think revisiting Citizen's United might not be a bad idea as the on the ground consequences of it have gone way further than expected. Having said that, putting that s*** back into the horse is probably futile.

OTOH, chipping away at NY Times v. Sullivan to place consequences for defamatory and prevarications in political speech.

---

I'm pretty sure that DC would threaten to start thermonuclear war before they will let go of Citizens United. If SCOTUS did rule it too broad, Congress would pass a bill to get around the court case.

Too much money flowing into DC through this huge hole for it to ever be patched.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

NormanEH said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Patel didn't name specific donors, financial institutions, or nonprofits,

---

There is no chance in hell he could have legally named them.

---

Then why is he saying anything? This admin is nothing but wind.

---

I feel certain you would be *****ing regardless.

---

It's a no win situation because everyone is fed up with delays, and DOJ let it get that way.

Don't say anything ==> "Why isn't anyone investigating??!"

"We're investigating" ==> "Stop talking and arrest somebody now, dammit"

"We're arresting Soros today" ==> "Hope it sticks"

MouthBQ98 said:

---

The legal process is glacial. Always has been. They lose cases they rush. Any investigation not done properly risks spoiling evidence and then there's no hope of anyone ever being indicted.

Also, the left is loaded with lawyers and they are usually very careful to stay in gray areas or go right up to the line without crossing it, and to cover their tracks legally, or set up and then exploit loopholes.

---

and….


These things need to be done delicately……

B-1 83 said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

The legal process is glacial. Always has been. They lose cases they rush. Any investigation not done properly risks spoiling evidence and then there's no hope of anyone ever being indicted.

Also, the left is loaded with lawyers and they are usually very careful to stay in gray areas or go right up to the line without crossing it, and to cover their tracks legally, or set up and then exploit loopholes.

---

and….


These things need to be done delicately……

---

Is that what Ariana Grande looks like now? Is she backwards Benjamin Button?

Soros really is into everything. Somehow the man just controls it all.

In the meantime, has even ONE person been able to get paid?

I think Soros must pay his bills like Trump does.

Add - Neville Roy Singham, The Peoples Forum. American billionaire living and a supporter of communist china.

aggiehawg said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

TA-OP said:

---

I've consistently said Citizen's United needs to be addressed yesterday.

---

Of course you have. Libs hate free speech.

---

I also think revisiting Citizen's United might not be a bad idea as the on the ground consequences of it have gone way further than expected. Having said that, putting that s*** back into the horse is probably futile.

OTOH, chipping away at NY Times v. Sullivan to place consequences for defamatory and prevarications in political speech.

---

Even remotely agreeing with me? I eagerly await you being ridiculed as a lib.

Let's not forget the Clinton foundation in all of this. Ties to Epstein and stands to reason ties to soros and other billionaires mentioned in previous threads.