[Link to existing thread https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3548558 -- Staff]

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/police-chief-trump-told-goodness-stopping-epstein-2006/story?id=130010254

Trump turned in that loser in 2006. Called the cops and said he was glad they are stopping him.

No wonder Biden didn't release any of these files.

Oops. Time for another narrative.

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

But it started a conversation…

FWTXAg said:

---

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

---

I actually don't think Trump calling police is new. As with much of the recent releases, much of it is repackaged old information and people with memory issues or those who don't follow as closely forget and treat as new.

I thought this had been acknowledged a long time ago. The DA that prosecuted Epstein said Trump was the only voluntary and cooperative witness.

"TRUMP told him people in New York knew EPSTEIN was disgusting. TRUMP said MAXWELL was EPSTEIN's operative, 'she is evil and to focus on her,' the report continues. "TRUMP told [Reiter] that he was around EPSTEIN once when teenagers were present and TRUMP 'got the hell out of there.' TRUMP was one of the very first people to call when people found out that they were investigating EPSTEIN," the report of Reiter's statement said."

Trump has given the idiot Dems just enough rope to hang themselves. They jumped right in with both feet.

flown-the-coop said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

---

I actually don't think Trump calling police is new. As with much of the recent releases, much of it is repackaged old information and people with memory issues or those who don't follow as closely forget and treat as new.

---

I have never seen it as reported anywhere. Even when the "TRUMP FLEW ON THE EPSTEIN PLANE" crap came out. It was known that Trump distanced himself, but not that he actually called the police.

If that was reported, I as well as millions of others never saw or heard it. And I listen to alot of right leaning media.

FWTXAg said:

---

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

---

If there's one thing we know for sure, it's that ABC News loves to run cover for Donald Trump.

But his name was mentioned 30000000 times in the files. The CMs said everything Trump has done politically was to distract from his buddy buddy involvement with Epstein.

LOL

Roger that. It hit me as familiar. Not the comments / details that were reported today but that there had been a report by Trump to Palm Beach police back in the day.

Either way, this information is consistent with what Trump cultists / sycophants / minions of Dear Leader have known and said, Trump being a pedo or pedo defender is about the dumbest accusation someone can make.

But when it comes to "Got him!" rationale and logic are suppressed and they become "deranged".

Belton Ag said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

---

If there's one thing we know for sure, it's that ABC News loves to run cover for Donald Trump.

---

Disney owes Trump over putting DeSantis in line. That's how the Deep state works.

The investigators have already said that they tried to interview dozens of people, when Epstein originally faced scrutiny years ago...and Trump was one of the only ones who would cooperate with them. They moved in the same NYC/Florida power circles, but when finding out what kind of guy Epstein was, Trump kicked the guy out of his properties, and severed all ties with him.

Through Epstein's own words, in all his emails...it was clear he very obviously hated Trump.

Trump is on video, years and years ago, talking about Hilary, and Clinton, and their 'Epstein problem'.

But somehow, people are obsessed with pinning Epstein on Trump...and some have convinced themselves Trump is the worst of the two.

Now, maybe years from now we find out terrible things about Trump. But as of now, based on what we know...the desperation is evident.

I think Trump is likely clean and has let the Dems run with this bull**** narrative until he's ready to release the files to hit them for maximum effect at just the right time.

If there is any hesitation on his part, it's probably that it will take out a few Republicans as well.

Trump vindicated and cleared once again

Ag87H2O said:

---

I think Trump is likely clean and has let the Dems run with this bull**** narrative until he's ready to release the files to hit them for maximum effect at just the right time.

If there is any hesitation on his part, it's probably that it will take out a few Republicans as well.

---

Careful, I was lambasted with all sorts of insults for suggesting such a thing.

But it's the game these days. The only way to lose is not to play.

It would not matter if they found an email from Epstein, himself, stating that Trump wanted nothing to do with teens, the leftist religion demands belief, and they will never change their minds.

I've said before, and I'll say again, if Trump were truly implicated in those files, it would have come out long ago to derail him.

Is he a womanizer and a creep? Yup, 100%. But, there's never been an indication that he wanted to chase underage girls.

Ag87H2O said:

---

I think Trump is likely clean and has let the Dems run with this bull**** narrative until he's ready to release the files to hit them for maximum effect at just the right time.

If there is any hesitation on his part, it's probably that it will take out a few Republicans as well.

---

After the last dump, I think it's obvious why He, along with others, are hesitant to release them. Along with the salient info, it also contains a massive amount of crazy ranting and accounts, from unhinged and unreliable sources. But those get reposted about 7 million times a day, even though they've been vetted as such (by Biden's admin as well).

I'm not saying we dont deserve to see everything. I tend to think we do. But I also know how twisted it gets, and who it will be directed towards, right or wrong.

He's a womanizer for sure. But let's go easy on the creep talk.

No man who is a creep is surrounded by the women he is in many leadership positions at his companies and admins if he were truly a creep.

At least what o consider a creep to be. Biden… def a creep. Obama a creep if you were a feminite dude. Neither of the Bushes but I would giver HW a nod on the creepier of the two. Reagan probably was but it was more acceptable to be a dirty old man back then.

Belton Ag said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

---

If there's one thing we know for sure, it's that ABC News loves to run cover for Donald Trump.

---

if you read the article , it is "see Trump has been lying as he said he had no knowledge of Epsteins illegal behavior- he clearly knew it because he told the police chief he was glad they were finally trying to stop it. This is meant as another Trump gotcha

Ag87H2O said:

---

I think Trump is likely clean and has let the Dems run with this bull**** narrative until he's ready to release the files to hit them for maximum effect at just the right time.

If there is any hesitation on his part, it's probably that it will take out a few Republicans as well.

---

1) This will not happen.
2) There is hesitation on his part. A lot. Which is why it will never happen.
3) It would take out a whole lot of Republicans, which is why it will never come out.
4) If Trump does release it, the bad guys won't miss the second time.

flown-the-coop said:

---

He's a womanizer for sure. But let's go easy on the creep talk.

No man who is a creep is surrounded by the women he is in many leadership positions at his companies and admins if he were truly a creep.

At least what o consider a creep to be. Biden… def a creep. Obama a creep if you were a feminite dude. Neither of the Bushes but I would giver HW a nod on the creepier of the two. Reagan probably was but it was more acceptable to be a dirty old man back then.

---

NSFW, but I agree with Bill Burr's take on this issue.

If Trump was selling lumber at home depot, he woudn't be a "womanizer". Why don't all of the gold-diggers that will sleep with anything that is rich get some of the blame?

Ag87H2O said:

---

I think Trump is likely clean and has let the Dems run with this bull**** narrative until he's ready to release the files to hit them for maximum effect at just the right time.

If there is any hesitation on his part, it's probably that it will take out a few Republicans as well.

---

That is kind of what I've been thinking as well. They released some of the files, then the Clintons are going to sit before Congress and plead the 5th on basically everything or claim to not have been a part of any island visits or anything else. Then at some point after, the juicy stuff will get released and then some real charges will start to come about. At least that is my hope anyway.

FWTXAg said:

---

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

---

So what are you saying? The deep state went back and rewrote transcripts to make Trump look good?

deddog said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

Deep state (Team Red and Team Blue) talking points are out.

Maybe this one will actually work.

---

So what are you saying? The deep state went back and rewrote transcripts to make Trump look good?

---

Yes!!! That's why he delayed the release of files. He had to get Elons bot farms to pack the files, then they staged their divorce which included mentioning Trumps name in the files and boom, here we are!!!

BusterAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

He's a womanizer for sure. But let's go easy on the creep talk.

No man who is a creep is surrounded by the women he is in many leadership positions at his companies and admins if he were truly a creep.

At least what o consider a creep to be. Biden… def a creep. Obama a creep if you were a feminite dude. Neither of the Bushes but I would giver HW a nod on the creepier of the two. Reagan probably was but it was more acceptable to be a dirty old man back then.

---

NSFW, but I agree with Bill Burr's take on this issue.

If Trump was selling lumber at home depot, he woudn't be a "womanizer". Why don't all of the gold-diggers that will sleep with anything that is rich get some of the blame?

---

Because they're not married. It's easy to not be a scumbag, if you want to bang pornstars don't get married in the first place.

Teslag said:

---

Trump vindicated and cleared once again

---

But those who live to hate him will pretend like that's not the case. Just like they did with the 'Very fine people' BS even though the transcript of his remarks clearly show that he denounced the hate groups in Charlottesville.

On to the next faux outrage...

But if one chooses to marry a porn star, can they continue to be a womanizer and banging other women? Asking for a friend.