We've reached a new low...

47,442 Views | 678 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by flown-the-coop
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

Some of you are disgusting. The loss of decorum in politics is eroding our society. This is who our children are learning how to follow.

Back in the 90's when I was in my 20's the president, a married father, was getting hummers from the chunky intern and blowing his nut on her blue Gap dress. He was also accused by numerous women of everything from sexual harassment to outright forced rape.

Did the kids learn this type of behavior was acceptable?



And to make it worse, she wasn't all that hot. Very bad example.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

Some of you are disgusting. The loss of decorum in politics is eroding our society. This is who our children are learning how to follow.

Back in the 90's when I was in my 20's the president, a married father, was getting hummers from the chunky intern and blowing his nut on her blue Gap dress. He was also accused by numerous women of everything from sexual harassment to outright forced rape.

Did the kids learn this type of behavior was acceptable?



Depends on that the definition of "was" was.
AgWhoop2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

No one. One side is killing people they disagree with.

Is your sample size Charlie Kirk?
King of the Dairy Queen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

No one. One side is killing people they disagree with.

Is your sample size Charlie Kirk?

there he goes, rationalizing murder. You have a demon bro.

every single time these people turn out to be the worst humans.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

Teslag said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

flown-the-coop said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

Some of you are disgusting. The loss of decorum in politics is eroding our society. This is who our children are learning how to follow.

Thank god. My son and his friends love Trump and have brought back joking, humor, picking on one another and gratuitous use of racial tropes amongst their group.

Its refreshing. Decorum is for elitist who want to control everyone.


Sounds like you are trying to excuse the lack of filter development and tact? Does your kid joke about people's dead moms too?


I no longer give a ****. The policies you support are more offensive than any video ever could be.

You don't know anything about 'the policies I support' - you are putting me in a basket that I am not a part of. Which is the entire problem with this country today. You can't just put someone in a box.


Have you ever voted Democrat? If so then you support their policies.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShotOver said:

Disgusting. Worse, there are people going to jump on here and either try to defend this or characterize negative responses as TDS. This egomaniac is an embarrassment to our country. He has no common sense.

Have you ever heard of a sense of proportion? Did you know that your car has more than just all hot or all cold on your AC?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

No one. One side is killing people they disagree with.

Is your sample size Charlie Kirk?


Your side tried to kill Trump twice.
King of the Dairy Queen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not to mention all the school shootings committed in the last 12 months by leftists for political reasons. I swear some of yall never leave your blue sky bubble.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

No one. One side is killing people they disagree with.

Is your sample size Charlie Kirk?

attempts on Kavanaugh, Trump, several of Trump's appointees. Kirk had several attempts on his life before one your buddies was finally successful and other conservative podcasters have had attempts on their lives. There's been hundreds of attempts on ICE officers just in the last 8 months. ..all your friends want to be heroes fighting against fascism, as if when you lose the election, another holocaust is happening that you have to stop with blood.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

No one. One side is killing people they disagree with.

Is your sample size Charlie Kirk?


Your side tried to kill Trump twice.


That we openly know about
austinAG90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

Some of you are disgusting. The loss of decorum in politics is eroding our society. This is who our children are learning how to follow.

Just a quick heads up.

If the left is accusing or complaining about something.







THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE IT !
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

Trump has never been a pedophile. So sick of this *****

The clip in question was at the end of another video, not posted independently.

The hatred some of you hold for this man is so over the top. It's bizarre.

Ah, well. It's settled then. A random woman on a message board who has a crush on him said so.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wish I had the privilege to be this upset about what Trump posted. Maybe one day I'll know what privilege is like.
Whether I get life's question right or wrong free will is an illusion.
Life is a game that plays us.
Are we dreaming of life or is life dreaming of us.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ervin Burrell said:

annie88 said:

Trump has never been a pedophile. So sick of this *****

The clip in question was at the end of another video, not posted independently.

The hatred some of you hold for this man is so over the top. It's bizarre.

Ah, well. It's settled then. A random woman on a message board who has a crush on him said so.



Your party of pizza parties would like to have a word with you.
Hungry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most prosperous nation in human history. Most powerful military in the world. Our nation has arguably the most plentiful and diverse natural resources on the planet.

Yet we fight each other over tweets and the Kid Rock Halftime Show versus the Bad Bunny Halftime show. Pretty remarkable actually.

I bet our politicians prefer it that way, and have for a very long time. I wonder why..
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungry said:

Most prosperous nation in human history. Most powerful military in the world. Our nation has arguably the most plentiful and diverse natural resources on the planet.

Yet we fight each other over tweets and the Kid Rock Halftime Show versus the Bad Bunny Halftime show. Pretty remarkable actually.

I bet our politicians prefer it that way, and have for a very long time. I wonder why..


Logical fallacies. Are you familiar with them?
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

93MarineHorn said:

AgWhoop2015 said:

Some of you are disgusting. The loss of decorum in politics is eroding our society. This is who our children are learning how to follow.

You've obviously never seen political cartoons from 100 - 200 years ago. There have been duels between congressmen. What you think is a loss of decorum is simply the Right fighting back for a change. Go bleed somewhere else, you're not going to shame anyone.


Tell me how great society was 100-200 years ago. What was going on then? Oh, right..

the roaring 20's?

Sure. What happened right after that?

lol lots of things happened after the 1920's. what point do you think you're making? You just adjusted the time frame to imply, what, political incivility led to the stock market collapse? political incivility led to the new deal? I honestly dont know what you think youre getting at?


Well in that time frame we had a Civil War, The Great Depression and two world wars, so I find it fascinating that we have people on here using those time periods as 'the good ole days' is all.

Who said that? Ffs, say what you mean and stop dancing around. I guess it's your only option since you're getting crushed on this thread. WHAT PERIOD OF TIME had the decorum you long for?
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

Some of you are disgusting. The loss of decorum in politics is eroding our society. This is who our children are learning how to follow.

I was here until about 30 years ago, and then Bill Clinton violated an intern in the Oval Office. Hmm, it mattered a bit less.

And then about 10 years ago Sleepy Joe Biden said of Mitt Romney that he was "going to put y'all people back in chains!" Mitt Milktoast White as a Cracker Normal Grandpa Mitt Freaking Romney, mind you.

And that's when I decided I guess decorum didn't matter at all.
Paul Pierce Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Paul Pierce Ag said:

oh no said:

GeorgiAg said:

BusterAg said:

GMaster0 said:

At this point people have already chosen. He's all over the Epstein files. We have 40 years of him being a terrible person documented. Nothing is going to change the minds of true believers at this point.

Do you have support for this?

Like, links to actual documents? Because that would be helpful.

he's in there more than Harry Potter is mentioned on all the books combined. He's mentioned like 38,000 times.



ok. now show me the 38,000 "mentions" with context.

I've seen some mentions where witness mentioned in a deposition that Epstein hated Trump. Does that count as a "mention"?



This maybe isn't the best counterargument to use. You've got a point, but the biggest misstep with that tweet is the scale imbalance.

There are 3.5 million pages in the "Epstein Files."

The Harry Potter books combined have fewer than 10k.

Even if we add in all of the screenplays from the 8 movies I bet the total page count still doesn't break 10k.


The difference in scale is simply absurd. Trump is mentioned 38,000 times in 3.5 million pages, or 0.01 times per page. What's the ratio for Harry Potter?



The response was in response to someone asking for support for Trump being "all over the Epstein files. Your point about scale is well taken, but he appears more than anyone(?) Is there anyone who appears in the files more than him?

None of that translates to guilt, I agree. But to act like he's not in there is absurd.



If you just wanted to say that Trump appears in the files and that you don't know whether or not he's the most mentioned person in those 3.5 million pages, just say that.

Arguing (or insinuating) that Trump features like a main character in those 3.5 million pages is an action only taken by liars or stupid people.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
shiftyandquick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One wonders if this depiction of the Obamas hurts Republicans among the Black Males that voted for Trump in the last election.

Of course MAGA Trumpers assure us that Republicans will do very well in the mid-terms. But I continue to be perplexed by the strategy, which is to appeal only to people in the F16 (i.e. diehard Trumpers), and to push away everyone else.

How does overt racism help Republicans build a coalition?

Oh well. FAFO.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ervin Burrell said:

annie88 said:

Trump has never been a pedophile. So sick of this *****

The clip in question was at the end of another video, not posted independently.

The hatred some of you hold for this man is so over the top. It's bizarre.

Ah, well. It's settled then. A random woman on a message board who has a crush on him said so.

I think that ZERO evidence produced by anyone "settles" it.
Monkeypoxfighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

Why weren't all the Black people depicted as monkeys, and not just the Obamas? In for a racist penny, in for a racist pound…….

I don't wade into this nonsense very often, butI was discussing this with my wife, and she was wondering why it was just the Obamas. If it was really all about calling Black people monkeys you'd think he'd have gotten Jefferies and Harris too. Maybe depicting the Obamas as monkeys isn't the same as calling them monkeys.
It only took me a year to figure out this place is nuts!
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paul Pierce Ag said:

GeorgiAg said:

Paul Pierce Ag said:

oh no said:

GeorgiAg said:

BusterAg said:

GMaster0 said:

At this point people have already chosen. He's all over the Epstein files. We have 40 years of him being a terrible person documented. Nothing is going to change the minds of true believers at this point.

Do you have support for this?

Like, links to actual documents? Because that would be helpful.

he's in there more than Harry Potter is mentioned on all the books combined. He's mentioned like 38,000 times.



ok. now show me the 38,000 "mentions" with context.

I've seen some mentions where witness mentioned in a deposition that Epstein hated Trump. Does that count as a "mention"?



This maybe isn't the best counterargument to use. You've got a point, but the biggest misstep with that tweet is the scale imbalance.

There are 3.5 million pages in the "Epstein Files."

The Harry Potter books combined have fewer than 10k.

Even if we add in all of the screenplays from the 8 movies I bet the total page count still doesn't break 10k.


The difference in scale is simply absurd. Trump is mentioned 38,000 times in 3.5 million pages, or 0.01 times per page. What's the ratio for Harry Potter?



The response was in response to someone asking for support for Trump being "all over the Epstein files. Your point about scale is well taken, but he appears more than anyone(?) Is there anyone who appears in the files more than him?

None of that translates to guilt, I agree. But to act like he's not in there is absurd.



If you just wanted to say that Trump appears in the files and that you don't know whether or not he's the most mentioned person in those 3.5 million pages, just say that.

Arguing (or insinuating) that Trump features like a main character in those 3.5 million pages is an action only taken by liars or stupid people.


Theyre quiet as hell on all the libs seen in the actual pictures and actual emails. That's pretty handy is it?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgWhoop2015 said:

Some of you are disgusting. The loss of decorum in politics is eroding our society. This is who our children are learning how to follow.


Were you just as upset when I was called a racist, a Nazi, a deplorable and a fascist by the left?
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Paul Pierce Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

Paul Pierce Ag said:

GeorgiAg said:

Paul Pierce Ag said:

oh no said:

GeorgiAg said:

BusterAg said:

GMaster0 said:

At this point people have already chosen. He's all over the Epstein files. We have 40 years of him being a terrible person documented. Nothing is going to change the minds of true believers at this point.

Do you have support for this?

Like, links to actual documents? Because that would be helpful.

he's in there more than Harry Potter is mentioned on all the books combined. He's mentioned like 38,000 times.



ok. now show me the 38,000 "mentions" with context.

I've seen some mentions where witness mentioned in a deposition that Epstein hated Trump. Does that count as a "mention"?



This maybe isn't the best counterargument to use. You've got a point, but the biggest misstep with that tweet is the scale imbalance.

There are 3.5 million pages in the "Epstein Files."

The Harry Potter books combined have fewer than 10k.

Even if we add in all of the screenplays from the 8 movies I bet the total page count still doesn't break 10k.


The difference in scale is simply absurd. Trump is mentioned 38,000 times in 3.5 million pages, or 0.01 times per page. What's the ratio for Harry Potter?



The response was in response to someone asking for support for Trump being "all over the Epstein files. Your point about scale is well taken, but he appears more than anyone(?) Is there anyone who appears in the files more than him?

None of that translates to guilt, I agree. But to act like he's not in there is absurd.



If you just wanted to say that Trump appears in the files and that you don't know whether or not he's the most mentioned person in those 3.5 million pages, just say that.

Arguing (or insinuating) that Trump features like a main character in those 3.5 million pages is an action only taken by liars or stupid people.


Theyre quiet as hell on all the libs seen in the actual pictures and actual emails. That's pretty handy is it?


Very much indeed. Gotta give props to Saul Alinsky, he seems to have made quite a devoted group of disciples
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Mentioned". Details matter.

He still never went to the island and he cut him off over 20 years ago.
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Aggie4Christ09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

This is who he's been the entire time. It's just completely mask off now.


It all tracks with emails Epstein sent saying Trump doesn't want any black girls to rape or murder.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

schmendeler said:

This is who he's been the entire time. It's just completely mask off now.


It all tracks with emails Epstein sent saying Trump doesn't want any black girls to rape or murder.

He's/she's back and in rare form! I believe that you believe this. Apologies if I have you confused with a different Ag4Christ.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

BusterAg said:

GeorgiAg said:

BusterAg said:

GMaster0 said:

At this point people have already chosen. He's all over the Epstein files. We have 40 years of him being a terrible person documented. Nothing is going to change the minds of true believers at this point.

Do you have support for this?

Like, links to actual documents? Because that would be helpful.

he's in there more than Harry Potter is mentioned on all the books combined. He's mentioned like 38,000 times.



OK, so, Epstein was really interested in Trump.

What was actually in the files? Is that not important to you? Just Epstein mentioning Trump's name is somehow proof of.........what exactly?

I'm not saying that he wasn't involved with Epstein. I'm saying that I have not seen any documents that are concerning. If there are those types of documents that are out there, it would be interesting to see them. Because, I basically trust zero people in the media to provide accurate information. I would rather form an opinion myself.

But, maybe you are one of those "where there is smoke there is fire" type guys?

The only argument against Trump is the smoke/fire.

The evidence is that when he found out what a creep he was, he cut ties. Trump was a playa, but zero evidence with him and young kids other than being pals with Epstein for a bit.

So:

1) This is a total non-argument, because at best we only see his name mentioned a lot with no context; or
2) This is actually relevant enough to post on TexAgs about, because the smoke/fire thing is still relevant, even without hard proof?

Curios on why you would bring it up?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ervin Burrell said:

annie88 said:

Trump has never been a pedophile. So sick of this *****

The clip in question was at the end of another video, not posted independently.

The hatred some of you hold for this man is so over the top. It's bizarre.

Ah, well. It's settled then. A random woman on a message board who has a crush on him said so.


Post number 3,404 where you don't discuss actual policy and just troll
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just a suggestion going forward to Trump. Instead of having your tech illiterate employee screen record a video, reach out to the person that created it and say "can you send me this? I want to post it for Trump."
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

One wonders if this depiction of the Obamas hurts Republicans among the Black Males that voted for Trump in the last election.

Of course MAGA Trumpers assure us that Republicans will do very well in the mid-terms. But I continue to be perplexed by the strategy, which is to appeal only to people in the F16 (i.e. diehard Trumpers), and to push away everyone else.

How does overt racism help Republicans build a coalition?

Oh well. FAFO.

You and the left are the ones reading racism into something that is not racist.

"FAFO" is rich and pretti good coming from your ilk lately.


oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dungeon Crawler Carl
How long do you want to ignore this user?


When all else fails, blame the intern.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.