Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
How do we kill the radical liberal mind virus?
8,050 Views |
176 Replies |
Last: 9 days ago by Ramdiesel
AtomicActuator said:
What do you do to the (presumably all) people who don't submit to your asylums or re-education?
It's violence with extra steps.
Yes, if they choose to get violent, you get violent with them, unfortunately. But they already do that when they constantly attack our federal agents doing their jobs. But yes, many would respond violently and would have to be met with force if they were ever required to submit to mental health testing for admission to these asylums.
That is why I support peaceful separation. But your side would then get violent again.
Yall are just....violent.
Malibu said:
Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
Want the easiest sanity check ever? EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT SENATOR supports men in womens' sports and showers and locker rooms. In a republic, what does that say about their mainstream base? That they range from "being fine" with it...to...fervent and fanatical support.
Again, every single democrat I know of views the recent incident COMPLETELY DIFFERENTLY than me and most normal reasonable people on here. She clearly was there to disrupt, and then gassed it at a federal officer when they were trying to question or detain her for obstrucion...not a single democrat can acknowledge this. Np way you can admit this shooting was justified. If you can...you are the EXTREME outlier.
Malibu said:
Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
The Science is Settled, humans can control the climate if we give globalists infinity money, but infinity money cant even help kids read.
No Human Is Illegal
Trans Men are Men, Trans Women are Women
COVID was from bat soup
Wearing a mask works, as does standing 6 feet away from people, unless you are in a restaurant and then you sit down and then the virus cant get to you.
You have to get an experimental shot for a cold virus or you should lose your jobs/children.
etc.etc. for a starting place.
You a seem to be advocating for the incarceration of people for thoughtcrime and then suggesting if they resist that unjust incarceration, that's their fault.
I probably don't need to say any more.
I probably don't need to say any more.
Ok, so specific alignment with transgendered ideology is one. FWIW, I'm with you on trans sports, and trans issues in general (while still holding there is an exceptionally small minority of people with brain structures that don't match their plumbing). Anything else?
AtomicActuator said:
MLK and the movement won hearts and minds.
When the civil rights act was before Congress, a Gallup poll found 61% of Americans supported it.
Be better and you will get more supporters.
The fallout from MLK's assassination, specifically the reordering of the black leadership structure, gave us the current crop of Marxists.
Real answer? 90% could probably be solved with appropriate Section230 reform.
Echo chambers fuel radicalization, and social media's operating environments have naturally resulted in radicalizing feedback loops.
There is no meaningful curtailing of the mind-virus without curtailment of social media's deviousness. Their use of "platform" as a liability shield while they act as a publisher must come to an end.
Echo chambers fuel radicalization, and social media's operating environments have naturally resulted in radicalizing feedback loops.
There is no meaningful curtailing of the mind-virus without curtailment of social media's deviousness. Their use of "platform" as a liability shield while they act as a publisher must come to an end.
Malibu said:
Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
More than 90% of democrats polled a few short years ago supported firing me for not getting that trash Covid vaccine, when I had a newborn and wife wasn't working.
60% supported forced lock down for anyone who refused.
50% supported harsh fines or imprisonment for "questioning the efficacy" of the vaccine or "spreading dangerous misinformation"
THIRTY F-ING PERCENT wanted my daughter taken away from me until I complied.
I just can't put that genie back in the bottle. I will never forget that. I know the true nature of the bulk of the left. No one cares that there are a few outliers like you who aren't completely bitter and vengeful freaks.
This thread is about the 'radical liberal mind virus' and you keep trying to pivot to EVERY LIBERAL THINKS about the ICE shooting in Minneapolis. As I said earlier, the WSJ mirrors my position, summed up nicely here:
It's a tragedy and agitprop for the left and right. I'm not getting sucked into either narrative of absolutism here.
Quote:
The uncomfortable reality is that these two sets of details aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. It's possible to believe Good was trying to escape from the agentsnot "run them over and ram them," as Ms. Noem allegedand also to wonder whether the officer reasonably might have feared for his safety when the vehicle advanced. Mr. Ross reportedly received dozens of stitches last year after a fleeing car dragged him about 300 feet.
It's a tragedy and agitprop for the left and right. I'm not getting sucked into either narrative of absolutism here.
AtomicActuator said:
You a seem to be advocating for the incarceration of people for thoughtcrime and then suggesting if they resist that unjust incarceration, that's their fault.
I probably don't need to say any more.
I think most Americans prefer sane and reasonable actions based on common sense. To heck with the cultural Marxism pimped by the Democrats..
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy
Malibu said:
Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
An oversimplification to be sure, but basically any fool who thinks more government, particularly federal government, is a good answer.
Screw winning hearts and minds. I'd settle for a government that adheres to the Constitution and doesn't overstep its bounds. It'd also be a big help if that government would quit spending money it doesn't have on bulls*** we don't need.
So your reaction to your injustice is violence and doing the same thing back? You are angry because someone violated a sacred principle to you, and now you are violating that principle back? How about a new paradigm of holding the principles the same and applying them to those who didn't apply it to you, because that is the right thing to do?
Malibu said:
This thread is about the 'radical liberal mind virus' and you keep trying to pivot to EVERY LIBERAL THINKS about the ICE shooting in Minneapolis. As I said earlier, the WSJ mirrors my position, summed up nicely here:Quote:
The uncomfortable reality is that these two sets of details aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. It's possible to believe Good was trying to escape from the agentsnot "run them over and ram them," as Ms. Noem allegedand also to wonder whether the officer reasonably might have feared for his safety when the vehicle advanced. Mr. Ross reportedly received dozens of stitches last year after a fleeing car dragged him about 300 feet.
It's a tragedy and agitprop for the left and right. I'm not getting sucked into either narrative of absolutism here.
Yep, I acknowledge that possibility and have done so on here. She was gaslit into thinking ICE were nazis by people like Kamala and Walz and hundreds of other dem leaders who keep painting them as such...showed up to "play hero" and let her partner out to film it...and then reality smacked her in the face and she may very well have just panicked, not fully realizing what she was doing. She definitely had no business being there.
So you can admit that it was completely justified with no qualifiers? If so, you would be literally the only liberal I have witnessed capable of this. Was this shooting justified based on video evidence?
Openly threatening Kristi Noem's AND law enforcement lives.
This needs to be CRUSHED.
This needs to be CRUSHED.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 9, 2026
Malibu said:
Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
I have yet to see any Republicans step up on the soapbox and propose reeducation camps for the Democrats.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-democrat-congressional-candidate-suggests-maga-supporters-go-re-education-camp
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2385479/pbs-lawyer-seen-on-video-calling-for-children-of-republicans-to-be-put-in-reeducation-camps/
AtomicActuator said:
You a seem to be advocating for the incarceration of people for thoughtcrime and then suggesting if they resist that unjust incarceration, that's their fault.
I probably don't need to say any more.
But it's ok when Hilary Clinton among others suggests it be done to conservatives?
I'm not suggesting you believe that, btw, just that she did publicly make that comment.
Malibu said:
So your reaction to your injustice is violence and doing the same thing back? You are angry because someone violated a sacred principle to you, and now you are violating that principle back? How about a new paradigm of holding the principles the same and applying them to those who didn't apply it to you, because that is the right thing to do?
I am not advocating for asylums or camps...someone was just asking about more "peaceful solutions" that would get you potentially banned on Texags in response to one of the first responses on the thread.
I 100% do advocate for peaceful divorce, but the left has made it clear that they would never allow that to be peaceful.
But yes, I am angry that the vast vast majority of the left wanted me ruined for not getting a trash vaccine I didn't need. Why would you expect differently? That is disgusting to me.
1981 Monte Carlo said:
...and then reality smacked her in the face
I'm pretty certain that what smacked her in the face was a 9mm slug.
A) Should she be dead right now? and B) did the officer make a reasonable judgment call in a split second? are different questions. The answer is no, and yes. I don't think the evidence points to someone trying to commit homicide against ICE, but it was not unreasonable for the officer to fear for his life and apply deadly force. I would vote to acquit if I were on a jury, while still holding that the woman's death was an avoidable tragedy.
I'd love a link to that video but of course it wouldn't* be ok. If only that were obvious to everyone here.
Malibu said:
A) Should she be dead right now? and B) did the officer make a reasonable judgment call in a split second? are different questions. The answer is no, and yes. I don't think the evidence points to someone trying to commit homicide against ICE, but it was not unreasonable for the officer to fear for his life and apply deadly force. I would vote to acquit if I were on a jury, while still holding that the woman's death was an avoidable tragedy.
Yes, it was avoidable...she had no business being gaslit into thinking ICE was evil and that it demanded this type of action and obstructiuon.
He was not at all out of line to shoot...I would 1000% say that if it had been a right winger in a MAGA hat. You cannot punch it at officers trying to detain you...and if you do so by accident because you just freak out or are trying to evade...that's on you as there is no way they could no that.
Completely justified. Sad that it was so avoidable but she just had to go there and mess around bc every single one of your leaders loves to put targets on the backs of these agents. CHAOS/VIOLENCE/FEAR during an opposing regime is bad for that regime. Even if you are the ones causing it. The democrat party figured this out long ago...catch up please.
Apologies. She stated that Trump supporters might need formal "deprogramming". She didn't outright say "re-education camps".
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/06/hillary-clinton-trump-supporters-deprogramming-maga-cnn-interview
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/06/hillary-clinton-trump-supporters-deprogramming-maga-cnn-interview
Slicer97 said:Malibu said:
Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
An oversimplification to be sure, but basically any fool who thinks more government, particularly federal government, is a good answer.
Screw winning hearts and minds. I'd settle for a government that adheres to the Constitution and doesn't overstep its bounds. It'd also be a big help if that government would quit spending money it doesn't have on bulls*** we don't need.
I think this is worth expanding on. $38T in debt and hyperinflation or supernova and deflation point to a government way too big. Spending on Constitutionally valid things like the military and our various (mis)adventures have undoubtedly been responsible for ballooning government spending, as have the multiple rounds of socialism (bailouts) signed by Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden.
Saying we're spending too much is 100% obvious. Saying what we should spend money on is a different question entirely.
I disagree entirely with the notion that Government has zero business being involved in various social issue, particularly around health and children's issues, while absolutely agreeing that the structure of the help matters and we're doing it wrong. Either way, debating the line of 'radical liberal mind virus' vs. different values of how to allocate scarce resources (USG budget) is useful.
Squishy
Looking forward to responding to anything of substance you may have to add.
The left is dying.
They took a huge move further to the left as a party. They just put ?????? in much of their party.
Take our kids back and all is good.
Race card is almost dead.
They did a great job of controlling education. They are going to price themselves out of that control.
They took a huge move further to the left as a party. They just put ?????? in much of their party.
Take our kids back and all is good.
Race card is almost dead.
They did a great job of controlling education. They are going to price themselves out of that control.
Malibu said:Slicer97 said:Malibu said:
Can you please be specific and define those positions that are 'unpopular ideas to free thinking people'. This thread is still fairly light on definitions of the mind virus but heavy on shoot them and put them in reeducation camps. I think if we're going to entertain that kid of rhetoric, we could have the courtesy of defining who gets to be first against the wall and escorted into the camp for right thinking.
An oversimplification to be sure, but basically any fool who thinks more government, particularly federal government, is a good answer.
Screw winning hearts and minds. I'd settle for a government that adheres to the Constitution and doesn't overstep its bounds. It'd also be a big help if that government would quit spending money it doesn't have on bulls*** we don't need.
I think this is worth expanding on. $38T in debt and hyperinflation or supernova and deflation point to a government way too big. Spending on Constitutionally valid things like the military and our various (mis)adventures have undoubtedly been responsible for ballooning government spending, as have the multiple rounds of socialism (bailouts) signed by Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden.
Saying we're spending too much is 100% obvious. Saying what we should spend money on is a different question entirely.
I disagree entirely with the notion that Government has zero business being involved in various social issue, particularly around health and children's issues, while absolutely agreeing that the structure of the help matters and we're doing it wrong. Either way, debating the line of 'radical liberal mind virus' vs. different values of how to allocate scarce resources (USG budget) is useful.
You are an outlier. You are probably part of the 10% of the modern democrat party. This is a cultural and ideological...not a fiscal...cold civil war.
I'm certainly not going to defend that dumb statement by a failed politician, but she didn't elaborate or suggest any form of internment or individual treatment.
A more reasonable interpretation of the statement is a formal program to put out anti-maga propaganda.
Still not great.
A more reasonable interpretation of the statement is a formal program to put out anti-maga propaganda.
Still not great.
Malibu said:
Looking forward to responding to anything of substance you may have to add.
Been there before. Not going to circle that emotional drain with you again.
AtomicActuator said:
I'm certainly not going to defend that dumb statement by a failed politician, but she didn't elaborate or suggest any form of internment or individual treatment.
A more reasonable interpretation of the statement is a formal program to put out anti-maga propaganda.
Still not great.
Enjoy your guild.
Alright, well, if potshots are your thing it's a free board. You're also welcome to just not respond.
AtomicActuator said:
I'm certainly not going to defend that dumb statement by a failed politician, but she didn't elaborate or suggest any form of internment or individual treatment.
A more reasonable interpretation of the statement is a formal program to put out anti-maga propaganda.
Still not great.
She's a "failed politician" now but she 100% represented the mainstream Democrat position. You are gaslighting.
Featured Stories
See All
5:48
9h ago
2.8k
Scouting Report: Texas A&M vs. Mississippi State
by Tom Schuberth
TexAgs is Hiring: Entry Level Software Developer
by Brandon Jones
jakeaggie84
If I'm Elko, my thoughts watching tonight's game....
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
123