Trump to sign EO to reschedule Mary Jane

1,523 Views | 15 Replies | Last: 29 days ago by 5Amp
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?


OPINION | THE GOLDILOCKS DRUG POLICY: HOW TRUMP FOUND THE PERFECT MIDDLE ON MARIJUANA

Trump's marijuana reclassification is the political equivalent of threading a needle while blindfolded: somehow, he's managed to give everyone just enough of what they want without giving anyone everything they demand.

By moving cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III, he's crafted a solution that's neither legalization nor prohibition, and that might be exactly why it works.

Consider Trump's impossible position.

His coalition includes libertarian tech bros who think all drugs should be legal and evangelical conservatives who view marijuana as moral decay.

Meanwhile, 68% of Americans support legalization, including majorities in swing states he needs for 2026.

Full legalization alienates his base.

Status quo makes him look behind the times.

So he's splitting the difference in the most Trump way possible: changing everything while changing nothing.

Here's the genius move: Schedule III classification acknowledges marijuana has medical value (making 40 states with medical programs happy) while keeping it federally controlled (satisfying law-and-order Republicans).

Cannabis businesses get to deduct expenses like normal companies, dropping their tax rates from 70% to around 21%, which injects billions into an industry employing 400,000 Americans.

But your evangelical aunt in Alabama can still truthfully say marijuana remains federally illegal.

The timing is surgical.

Democrats spent years pushing for this but couldn't deliver.

Now they can't attack Trump for doing exactly what they wanted, but also can't claim credit.

Republicans who might normally revolt are staying quiet because the alternative is Democrats taking the issue in 2026.

Even cannabis executives who typically donate blue are suddenly very interested in staying on Trump's good side.

What actually changes for regular people?

Honestly... not much.

You still can't legally fly with weed.

Federal workers still can't partake.

Banks remain skittish.

But that's the point.

Trump's giving the industry what it needs to survive (tax relief) without the cultural flashpoint of full legalization.

It's incremental change cleverly dressed as bold action.

The real winners are existing cannabis companies who've survived federal prohibition and now get rewarded with lower taxes while potential competitors still face federal barriers to entry.

States keep their tax revenue.

Research restrictions ease, potentially unlocking medical breakthroughs.

The prison industrial complex keeps its marijuana possession cases.

Everyone gets something; nobody gets everything.

This is Trump reading the room perfectly.

Young voters see progress on marijuana.

Business conservatives see tax relief and job creation.

Social conservatives see federal prohibition maintained.

The median voter sees common sense.

It's not principled policy; it's masterful politics.

And in a democracy where 60% support usually means nothing gets done, finding a way to move forward while keeping everyone slightly unhappy might be the best anyone can hope for.

Is it intellectually coherent to keep marijuana illegal while treating it like any other business for tax purposes?

Absolutely not.

But politics isn't about coherence; it's about coalition management.

Trump just managed his coalition brilliantly, giving the cannabis industry its biggest win ever while technically keeping his promise to be tough on drugs.

That's not hypocrisy; that's governance in a divided country.

Source: CNCB, NYT, WaPo
Burrus86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrapeSoda may like this one!
Burrus86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How to get Democrats to fight legalization…
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My wife has a prescription to cannabis treatments, for the CBDs, not so much the THC. It use to be very expensive, a few thousand a year. The price has come down over the last few years but I think this could help more

Just buying it alone is a pain in the ass because its cash only, I believe due to debanking
oklaunion
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will Texans be able to legally order it thru mail-order?
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oklaunion said:

Will Texans be able to legally order it thru mail-order?



No idea how all.the individual rules will work. I use to work at a company that would not allow us to invest in cannabis companies and had to report to security if we did
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looking for votes.
JamesPShelley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Any progress that improves on 1970's laws is a win. Period.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All makes sense but Mario didn't right that...AI did.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In before GrapeSoda.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The biggest change here is that the penalties for possessing and dealing schedule 3 are much lighter than schedule 1.

Schedule 1 dealing in certain amounts includes a mandatory prison time.

The will make both black men and techno neckbeards like Trump a little bit more, two demographics that don't really like the GOP.

The second biggest change is what the article talks about. Good weed is about to get cheaper. The taxes and insurance on grow operations is insane. I might have to get back into the valuation of weed businesses, which has been so, so dead due to oversupply and razor thin margins. Dusting off my green colored business cards.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So does this overwrite the MJ clause that Congress slipped into the CR? I assume so?
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At least it's a step forward. Now, because I'm in texas, time to load up my legal hemp into my vaporizer.

Waiting for the good stuff to one day be legal here...
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

So does this overwrite the MJ clause that Congress slipped into the CR? I assume so?


That was to payback alcohol campaign donations

I think it puts it all on the table for a real law eventually. I think they have till Jan 2027
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jamey said:

YouBet said:

So does this overwrite the MJ clause that Congress slipped into the CR? I assume so?


That was to payback alcohol campaign donations

I think it puts it all on the table for a real law eventually. I think they have till Jan 2027


Yeah I assumed that. Just wasn't sure how this EO interplays with that law.
5Amp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Schedule III is a huge change IMO
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.