lbcshort said:
I read the article and I felt like one thing the author was trying to point out, aside from the President Welch situation, was the difficulty at institutions trying to follow federal mandates (which were quite liberal) and the time continuum where there was a backlash from conservatives in Texas. I was naive that Governor Abbott was so influential in what happenedI guess I thought he appointed the regents and they had oversight/control over administration. It seems he is possibly way more concerned about how "leftest" A&M is and not as concerned about his own Alma Mater.
I see college as a place for students to have their perspectives challenged. I am not afraid of a moderate. I am more concerned about never seeing, reading, or hearing anything outside of a bubble. Sometimes being exposed to other ideas strengthens your own views.
Blast away and call me names.
No need to call names. I agree college should be a place where young people get exposed to ideas across the political spectrum, from far left to far right. It's an eye opener to the diversity of the human race. Hopefully they learn through their experience that different isn't necessarily wrong, it's just different.
The issue that has caused hard pushback from conservative alum is that most colleges -- including A&M -- supported full display of far left ideology but not the corresponding far right. One was "good and tolerant" while the other was characterized as "hateful and dark." Many, many examples of right-of-center speakers, clubs, opinions, etc. being shut down or shouted over on campuses, with both implicit and explicit support from administrators.
That is crap, and it needed to be called out. More emphatically, the people who allowed it to exist need to be removed and replaced with administrators who embrace the opportunity for students to see the full range of human expression and make their own choices about how they want to live their life. Tolerance is only real if it applies to everyone.