I've never intentionally watched Nick Fuentes. I've seen clips where he looks really bad, and other clips where he sounds reasonable. I've seen supporters claim that the bad clips are taken out of context and that some of the ridiculous things he says are inside jokes. Sorta like when Rush Limbaugh referred to Feminazis. Out of context one would think Rush was talking about even every woman who wanted to occasionally leave the kitchen, while long time listeners would know that he was talking about those feminists who fight tooth and nail to ensure that as many abortions happen as possible. Well, Hughes has a good summary of what is going on. In short, there is a rumble version (where most the bad clips originate) and the sanitized podcast version.

Nick Fuentes knows exactly what he’s doing. pic.twitter.com/WR4NYUXChe

— Conversations with Coleman (@ConvoswColeman) December 4, 2025

Summary? Don't feel like listening to 17 minutes worth.

Fuentes seems to be one of the "conservative" podcasters that is being financed by Qatar.

Fuentes is also no Rush, not even close. He says whatever he needs to in order to get more views. Also is very punchable.

aTmAg said:

---

Summary:

He says his true feelings on Rumble to his hard core audience. There he talks about how the Holocaust was overblown, that the Joos are to blame for everything, that we should bring back segregation, go on a huge killing spree once "we gain power" and all of that.

Yet when he goes on podcast interviews, like with Tucker Carlson, he refrains from saying any of this. He acts like everything about him is taken out of context, that "we don't want to harm anybody.. we just want to put America first." despite saying the exact opposite to his audience on Rumble.



In short, the dude is a POS and should be shunned by every conservative in America.

---

Too bad the most influential Republicans (Trump and Vance) refuse to do so.

Someone posted something several days ago that had been kind of circling around in thoughts. This thread has brought it to mind again. The mention of Limbaugh is off, but its in the right direction. Think Howard Stern. To coin a phrase if it doesn't exist, it seems likely that Fuentes is what could be called an "intellectual shock jock".

That may sound like an oxymoron, but if you think of what a shock jock does, he rattles things on philosophical and social levels, intellectual, the way a Stern does on sexual and pop culture things. Speaking outlandishly about some things that are in street terms true, not lies, but in a bomb tossing fashion.

Another possibility is -- remember Richard Spencer? Turned out to be something an Obamian plant or adherent, so psyop as board likes to say. He may also be of that variety -- something that is not what he seems.

What he isn't is a spokesman for MAGA or even the GOP or CPAC.

Great take down!

Thank you for posting!

I saw a clip the other day he said "speaker phone is not the default setting on a phone".

Not sure about the rest of his stuff but that should be shouted from the heavens.

My immediate thoughts turned to "shock jock" mentality.

Hell, there were probably many more of these twits on local radio back in the day than there are podcasters now.

Say the wildest things and keep getting wilder until you go too far, say you are sorry, then push the line again and again. Eventually you will get a following and some attention.

I have never listened to him and I don't plan to. I have no conservative friends that have ever mentioned him or his views. I think he is purely a product of social media and the obsession of the leftists to make him some kind of conservative icon. Just more fake news.

P.U.T.U said:

---

Summary? Don't feel like listening to 17 minutes worth.

Fuentes seems to be one of the "conservative" podcasters that is being financed by Qatar.

Fuentes is also no Rush, not even close. He says whatever he needs to in order to get more views. Also is very punchable.

---

Fuentes entire following was born as he was leading the American Nazi party.

and was a socialist- and proudly against capitalism.

now he tries to weasel himself into taking over for Charlie Kirk with the help of Tucker Carlson

because they both hate the Jews.

how many Americans died fighting Nazi Germany?

Fuentes praising the Nazis in his own words:

aTmAg said:

---

Summary:

He says his true feelings on Rumble to his hard core audience. There he talks about how the Holocaust was overblown, that the Joos are to blame for everything, that we should bring back segregation, go on a huge killing spree once "we gain power" and all of that.

Yet when he goes on podcast interviews, like with Tucker Carlson, he refrains from saying any of this. He acts like everything about him is taken out of context, that "we don't want to harm anybody.. we just want to put America first." despite saying the exact opposite to his audience on Rumble.

In short, this is NOT a case where libs falsely claim a conservative is "racist" or whatever. The dude is a true POS and should be shunned by every conservative in America.

---

Another thing he will do is weasel out of it..."yeah, maybe I have said things in the past that I shouldn't have said or didn't really mean, just in the heat of the moment, it's just what I do and I don't mean all of it, I don't hate anyone" etc.

Candace Owens of all people exposed this kid as a complete b**** on a podcast interview. I highly suspect that he is a closeted gay incel who cannot even begin to come to grips with who he really is. That he loves having a "following", no matter what. And he'd be crushed if you ever took this away from him bc it's all he's got and all he's ever had.

****ing **** stain of a human

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him. Anyone who's been around for long enough in those circles knows he's a fed. Him filling the vacuum left by Kirk isn't organic

He's doing his job brilliantly by the way. He might singlehandedly split conservatives into two factions by the next election

Nick is closer to filling the void Milo left than the void Kirk or Rush left.

Much like Milo, one day one of his unhinged statements will go viral, and he'll quickly fall into the untouchable has bin.

1) Coleman Hughes is one of the most articulate and insightful political philosophers alive. He might have accomplished more before 30 than anyone has since Alexander the Great. He's simply a national treasure.

Quote:

---

He[Fuentes] is doing his job brilliantly by the way. He might singlehandedly split conservatives into two factions by the next election

---

2) Nope. Fuentes is a straw man. The leftists want him to be popular because he is such an ass, and leftists want to group all conservatives with him. Only really big *******s like Fuentes.

3) There are not two people that were living in 2025 that were more different than Kirk ("race is likely the least important thing about who you are") and Fuentes ("White men are the only good people alive").

Muslims love Fuentes partly because of this clip:

Nick Fuentes says the "Muslim problem" in the United States is a jewish distraction

"To me the Muslim thing is just a complete non-issue in the United States as of right now, it's the definition of scare mongering." pic.twitter.com/MIxTNFXpKl

— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) December 2, 2025

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

The left is desperate to make him popular because they offer nothing. Voters don't care or even know about this dude.

They did the same thing during the election

samurai_science said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

The left is desperate to make him popular because they offer nothing. Voters don't care or even know about this dude.

They did the same thing during the election

---

Well, he's a lefty/racist, so they have a lot in common.

Fuentes is a younger version of Howard Stern, just substitute raunchy content, with inflammatory triggering political content.

He makes a lot of valid mainstream points that keep him legitimate, while mixing in extreme controversial takes to get huge "Streisand Effect" publicity from the left. That hatred from left, fuels support from right. Which gives him a gigantic following.

Props to him for having the balls to pull it off. Very lucrative way to make a living, but the price is always having to look over your shoulder for some leftist nutcase.

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him. Anyone who's been around for long enough in those circles knows he's a fed. Him filling the vacuum left by Kirk isn't organic

He's doing his job brilliantly by the way. He might singlehandedly split conservatives into two factions by the next election

---

Dude has been around for a long ass time and hated Charlie. Some thought it might have been one of Fuentes' groypers that assassinated Charlie

FobTies said:

---

Fuentes is a younger version of Howard Stern, just substitute raunchy content, with inflammatory triggering political content.

He makes a lot of valid mainstream points that keep him legitimate, while mixing in extreme controversial takes to get huge "Streisand Effect" publicity from the left. That hatred from left, fuels support from right. Which gives him a gigantic following.

Props to him for having the balls to pull it off. Very lucrative way to make a living, but the price is always having to look over your shoulder for some leftist nutcase.

---

The price is also 99.9999% of the world thinking you're a racist piece of **** while the only tiny percentage of people who like and believe you are dumbass 19 year old incels who work at Chipotle.

aTmAg said:

---

Summary:

He says his true feelings on Rumble to his hard core audience. There he talks about how the Holocaust was overblown, that the Joos are to blame for everything, that we should bring back segregation, go on a huge killing spree once "we gain power" and all of that.

Yet when he goes on podcast interviews, like with Tucker Carlson, he refrains from saying any of this. He acts like everything about him is taken out of context, that "we don't want to harm anybody.. we just want to put America first." despite saying the exact opposite to his audience on Rumble.



In short, this is NOT a case where libs falsely claim a conservative is "racist" or whatever. The dude is a true POS and should be shunned by every conservative in America.

---

Sounds like your average democrat

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

FobTies said:

---

Fuentes is a younger version of Howard Stern, just substitute raunchy content, with inflammatory triggering political content.

He makes a lot of valid mainstream points that keep him legitimate, while mixing in extreme controversial takes to get huge "Streisand Effect" publicity from the left. That hatred from left, fuels support from right. Which gives him a gigantic following.

Props to him for having the balls to pull it off. Very lucrative way to make a living, but the price is always having to look over your shoulder for some leftist nutcase.

---

The price is also 99.9999% of the world thinking you're a racist piece of **** while the only tiny percentage of people who like and believe you are dumbass 19 year old incels who work at Chipotle.

---

To be fair. There are also about ten "adults" on texags that also are big fans of that **** stain.

I keep seeing this guy's name mentioned thinking they're talking about Nick Freitas, who is an actual badass conservative.

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

Watch the last minute and 20 seconds of the clip in the OP or just choose to keep your heads buried in the sand because you don't read anything outside of F16.

Nick Fuentes has way more power among the young "right wing" voting bloc than you think (for worse).

P.U.T.U said:

---

Summary? Don't feel like listening to 17 minutes worth.

---

He's a racist, anti-semitic, genocidal lunatic who airs out all of his twisted ideas and plans on Rumble only to upload sterilized, edited versions and clips to the more mainstream platforms. He then goes on more mainstream shows and podcasts and says none of the most heinous things he believes, casts himself as a misrepresented victim, etc.

flown-the-coop said:

---

My immediate thoughts turned to "shock jock" mentality.

Hell, there were probably many more of these twits on local radio back in the day than there are podcasters now.

Say the wildest things and keep getting wilder until you go too far, say you are sorry, then push the line again and again. Eventually you will get a following and some attention.

---

The stuff he says in the full versions of his podcast on Rumble go way beyond anything any radio shock jock/Howard Stern types did back in the day. It's not the sort of stuff you say just for attention. Interviewing a porn star and asking her lewd and provocative questions is just entirely different in kind than saying you want to round up and kill all the jews once your side gains the power to do so.

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

Watch the last minute and 20 seconds of the clip in the OP or just choose to keep your heads buried in the sand because you don't read anything outside of F16.

Nick Fuentes has way more power among the young "right wing" voting bloc than you think (for worse).

---

Not sure how that is a retort to my statement.

That's ****ing weird, to base your thoughts on a subject on what some moron (and not just him....podcasts in general, etc) says he thinks about that subject. It's like people can't think for themselves; mostly due to the idiotic internet itself.

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

You're not the target audience. Fuentes' influence with the 15-30 year old male demographic is ENORMOUS. It would be extremely difficult to find a white male in the US in that age range who doesnt know who he is. With Charlie Kirk gone his short clips have become by far the most viewed male content on Tik Tok/Facebook/Twitter/etc. He's unfortunately the most influential voice to young men out there now.

BigRobSA said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

Watch the last minute and 20 seconds of the clip in the OP or just choose to keep your heads buried in the sand because you don't read anything outside of F16.

Nick Fuentes has way more power among the young "right wing" voting bloc than you think (for worse).

---

Not sure how that is a retort to my statement.

That's ****ing weird, to base your thoughts on a subject on what some moron (and not just him....podcasts in general, etc) says he thinks about that subject. It's like people can't think for themselves; mostly due to the idiotic internet itself.

---

You can think it's weird all you want, I'm not even saying you're wrong. But the fact is the OVERWHELMING majority of people in our society develop their beliefs in this way, especially young people. Essentially anything an 18 year old believes about geopolitics is going to be a regurgitated take from some political actor/personality.

The point is that no matter how stupid you think it is that Fuentes has massive influence, he does. And over time that has real world consequences. The list of nations/societies/civilizations that were fundamentally transformed by a relatively small percentage of angry, disenfranchised young men with radical ideas in their heads is very long.

BigRobSA said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

Watch the last minute and 20 seconds of the clip in the OP or just choose to keep your heads buried in the sand because you don't read anything outside of F16.

Nick Fuentes has way more power among the young "right wing" voting bloc than you think (for worse).

---

Not sure how that is a retort to my statement.

That's ****ing weird, to base your thoughts on a subject on what some moron (and not just him....podcasts in general, etc) says he thinks about that subject. It's like people can't think for themselves; mostly due to the idiotic internet itself.

---

Uhm, pot meet kettle. You didn't even watch the video, have no clue who the guy is outside of a single forum on a single website on the world wide web, yet are totally an expert on the subject the OP started a thread about.

Get the **** outta here.

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Muktheduck said:

---

Honestly, if this board didn't post about him daily I'd never hear about him.

---

This.

It's weird how many people look to others, via podcast, books, movies, etc for their personal principles. Political, or otherwise.

---

Watch the last minute and 20 seconds of the clip in the OP or just choose to keep your heads buried in the sand because you don't read anything outside of F16.

Nick Fuentes has way more power among the young "right wing" voting bloc than you think (for worse).

---

Not sure how that is a retort to my statement.

That's ****ing weird, to base your thoughts on a subject on what some moron (and not just him....podcasts in general, etc) says he thinks about that subject. It's like people can't think for themselves; mostly due to the idiotic internet itself.

---

Uhm, pot meet kettle. You didn't even watch the video, have no clue who the guy is outside of a single forum on a single website on the world wide web, yet are totally an expert on the subject the OP started a thread about.

Get the **** outta here.

---

I don't care if it's this dude, or Rush Limbaugh or the Pope...basing YOUR beliefs on what some idiot says they think about the issue is ****ing dumb.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

The price is also 99.9999% of the world thinking you're a racist piece of **** while the only tiny percentage of people who like and believe you are dumbass 19 year old incels who work at Chipotle.

---

Your math is off. Many in the podcasting world are drooling over Fuentes. They know if they have him on, it will be their biggest episode with 10x the view count of their typical vids.

Its stupid. Just like IG accounts with huge followings that post garbage clips. We are living in idiocracy.

When the right went crazy over that bud light trans person, she amassed a huge following from the left. As the left went crazy about Fuentes, he amassed a huge following from the right. A lot of the reason people like Trump is bc of the TDS he causes. Its all just the nature of the blue and red sheeple.