Interesting ISIS tweet

12,499 Views | 105 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by bobbranco
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

Blame muslims all you want but white liberals did this to us

Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TommyBrady said:

White Women will be the downfall of the West
I heard a reframe that I'm still chewing on: women are inherently conservative OF THEIR STATUS QUO. Effectively: modern women are simply reflecting an amplified version of 90s & 00s men. You know: the ones who amplified women in office settings, imported muhammadans post 9/11, allowed rainbow expansion, offshored physical work, enforced that there were off-limits topics, and turned to a screen on Sundays?

Because women arrange themselves within complex social hierarchies, the ones who claw to the top oppose disruption.

I'm not sold that this is completely true. Smartphones & social media have had civilizationally impactful effects, but it's compelling.

And it means that men of the squishy right have been highly culpable for our current predicament.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

Kashchei said:

As others on this board have said recently, what needs to be done to reverse this is unconstitutional. Unfortunately. We are going to die bound by the constraints of our own system.


It's called removing the senate filibuster

Or another way if must, Caesarism.

Islamicization may eventually require its blunt clarity to stop it.
El Gato Charro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TommyBrady said:

White Women will be the downfall of the West

What is interesting is that if I state "Black men will be the downfall of the West" I could expect a ban from TexAgs. Why is it acceptable to categorize whites as a demographic, but not POC?
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gato Charro said:

TommyBrady said:

White Women will be the downfall of the West

What is interesting is that if I state "Black men will be the downfall of the West" I could expect a ban from TexAgs. Why is it acceptable to categorize whites as a demographic, but not POC?


Maybe because white women have had more of an impact of politics than black men ever have?

Just spit balling here.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?


...and we are here...

Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
TommyBrady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gato Charro said:

TommyBrady said:

White Women will be the downfall of the West

What is interesting is that if I state "Black men will be the downfall of the West" I could expect a ban from TexAgs. Why is it acceptable to categorize whites as a demographic, but not POC?


Enjoy your ban
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rocky the dog said:



...and we are here...



Change is over-rated. RMS Titanic experienced a "change" by 11am April 14, 1912.
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TommyBrady said:

FobTies said:

I dont care about Muslims being passionate about their faith and wanting to spread it. The problem is doing it in a country founded on Christian principles. Yes, there is "separation of church and state", but that just means gov cant impose a religion on its citizens. It does NOT mean our founding docs, Constitution, and country arent structured around Christianity. They can thrive as atheists or practicing Muslims in this country, but they will never remove Christianity from our history or future. At least not on the SEC states.


I care about Muslims wanting to spread their faith and anybody who cares about Christianity and the western would should as well. It is a religion of conquest.

Its not illegal for Muslims to share their faith, also nothing you can do about it. However, dismantling our Christian heritage or trying to displace our foundational Christian principles with Sharia, is totally different. Thats an offense that requires immediate action. We arent there yet. UK is. If it ever gets there here, we will do much more than internet post about it.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

TommyBrady said:

FobTies said:

I dont care about Muslims being passionate about their faith and wanting to spread it. The problem is doing it in a country founded on Christian principles. Yes, there is "separation of church and state", but that just means gov cant impose a religion on its citizens. It does NOT mean our founding docs, Constitution, and country arent structured around Christianity. They can thrive as atheists or practicing Muslims in this country, but they will never remove Christianity from our history or future. At least not on the SEC states.


I care about Muslims wanting to spread their faith and anybody who cares about Christianity and the western would should as well. It is a religion of conquest.

Its not illegal for Muslims to share their faith, also nothing you can do about it. However, dismantling our Christian heritage or trying to displace our foundational Christian principles with Sharia, is totally different. Thats an offense that requires immediate action. We arent there yet. UK is. If it ever gets there here, we will do much more than internet post about it.


Seeing as how the UK is the size of Oregon, I'd rest easily knowing that our great great great great great grandchildren have nothing to worry about to that happening in this country. And that's IF the everything falls in line in the house, senate, SC, and who knows what else to actually get to that point.

We're fine.
tFast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TommyBrady said:

White Women will be the downfall of the West

Yup. When I moved to the northeast, my eyes were opened to the fact that White women are absolutely in the driver's seat of the woke intersectional movement. They're steering that ship, and the White men that are following are simply hoping for some action. Sorry folks, because I know some of you just don't want to hear it... but it's absolutely true and you'll see it the moment you stop lying to yourselves.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tFast said:

TommyBrady said:

White Women will be the downfall of the West

Yup. When I moved to the northeast, my eyes were opened to the fact that White women are absolutely in the driver's seat of the woke intersectional movement. They're steering that ship, and the White men that are following are simply hoping for some action. Sorry folks, because I know some of you just don't want to hear it... but it's absolutely true and you'll see it the moment you stop lying to yourselves.

Regarding the driver's seat part of it, yes, that was an observation Rush was making not infrequently in his later years. Also (and agree) that the feminized MSM had become itself the real Democratic Party and drives of the Left agenda along with the campuses. The DNC more reacting than leading the narrative.
El Gato Charro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tFast said:

TommyBrady said:

White Women will be the downfall of the West

Yup. When I moved to the northeast, my eyes were opened to the fact that White women are absolutely in the driver's seat of the woke intersectional movement. They're steering that ship, and the White men that are following are simply hoping for some action. Sorry folks, because I know some of you just don't want to hear it... but it's absolutely true and you'll see it the moment you stop lying to yourselves.

I really don't GAS about what some yankee thinks about whites or women.

I just went to a fundraiser for the women's Republican party at my local county. Hate to break it to you, but they were all white. 100%. Conservative and red ass too.

It's not white women that are the problem, it is liberals that are the problem.

Enjoy living in the northeast and stay out of Texas.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

MouthBQ98 said:

I used to be relatively neutral regarding immigration and thought it to be more or less a good thing. I think now we are getting too many too fast and are not requiring enough of thrm to allow them to be eligible, and are far too generous with our social welfare eligibility for them. We are obviously not adequately assimilating new immigrants in at the rate they are arriving.

My friend, this trend has been going on since 1970 once Hart-Cellar was in full steam after being passed in 1965. 1/6th of the US population is foreign born and they have birthrates that dwarf native born Americans.

The last 50 years of immigration do not at all resemble 1800 - 1910.

True. That's a good thing the dissident right has done. They have called attention to and outlined this destructive process and how began. And exposed some of the press and campus attempts to conceal or sugarcoat the trends.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

I dont care about Muslims being passionate about their faith and wanting to spread it. The problem is doing it in a country founded on Christian principles. Yes, there is "separation of church and state", but that just means gov cant impose a religion on its citizens. It does NOT mean our founding docs, Constitution, and country arent structured around Christianity. They can thrive as atheists or practicing Muslims in this country, but they will never remove Christianity from our history or displace it in our future. At least not in the States with all the guns.

This is a very naive take.
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why dont you elaborate?

Naive on the Christain foundation of our country?
Or, naive on the immediate threat to us of Islam?
Cru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess just know it has to be.

Behind every nation, every headline, every war there are spiritual forces at work. All of this is a 4,000-year-old spiritual war over God's covenant with Abraham. Satan has been trying to stop that promise since Genesis 3, and he uses nations, leaders, and ideologies to do it.

"We do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places."
Ephesians 6:12

How quickly we forget hamas.

Genesis 6:11: "Now the earth was corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled with violence [hamas]."

Genesis 6:13: "And God said to Noah, 'I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence [hamas] through them; behold, I will destroy them with the earth.'"
nu awlins ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

MouthBQ98 said:

I used to be relatively neutral regarding immigration and thought it to be more or less a good thing. I think now we are getting too many too fast and are not requiring enough of thrm to allow them to be eligible, and are far too generous with our social welfare eligibility for them. We are obviously not adequately assimilating new immigrants in at the rate they are arriving.

My friend, this trend has been going on since 1970 once Hart-Cellar was in full steam after being passed in 1965. 1/6th of the US population is foreign born and they have birthrates that dwarf native born Americans.

The last 50 years of immigration do not at all resemble 1800 - 1910.


Truth. This isn't the melting pot of 1900, more like a huge grease fire with liberals throwing water on it.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

I used to be relatively neutral regarding immigration and thought it to be more or less a good thing. I think now we are getting too many too fast and are not requiring enough of thrm to allow them to be eligible, and are far too generous with our social welfare eligibility for them. We are obviously not adequately assimilating new immigrants in at the rate they are arriving.

Welcome to 20 years ago. I would say glad to have you aboard, but your line of thinking is why nothing was done for the last 20 years.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

MouthBQ98 said:

I used to be relatively neutral regarding immigration and thought it to be more or less a good thing. I think now we are getting too many too fast and are not requiring enough of thrm to allow them to be eligible, and are far too generous with our social welfare eligibility for them. We are obviously not adequately assimilating new immigrants in at the rate they are arriving.

Welcome to 20 years ago. I would say glad to have you aboard, but your line of thinking is why nothing was done for the last 20 years.

You are being too harsh. Many of us thought the reaction to 9/11 was precisely upside down TSA going after obvious American types, the grandmother stereotype actually happening, and refusing to `profile.' No deportations of obvious Islamists. Also fretting about Islmaphobia. But you have to look at the lack of choices. People keep forgetting before Trump almost no one ran on an anti-MSM and get tough on the borders and influx question. Hell, even during a WAR, Bush was wanting to make the border more porus -- remember that coalition of right wingers including Rush lining up against him? The 911 war never fought in post Pearl Harbor fashion.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Voted in Virginia last night.

Republican Party either picked a dud to run as Governor, or they did a very poor job at helping her. At first blush, IMO she wasn't very well supported.

The challenge here in Virginia is there is a large illegal alien population here…..so you know where those votes went. Saw where black votes went 9 to 1 for Blue. Then there are a ton of hurt, feeling sorry for themselves government workers who all mostly voted for blue.

It was almost a no win situation.

Republicans need to end the filibuster……Democrats will end it if they get into office and use it to their advantage. Do it now, get the government back up and let's get back to cutting government.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I posted about that race two weeks ago!
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was against illegal immigration but it took awhile for the true magnitude of illegal immigration plus legal immigration plus all the guest programs that often turn into legal immigration in combination to become apparent. We are definitely bringing in more looters and dependents than contributors and we can't afford it.
Bobaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just nuke Mecca. Problem solved. See if they will still talk tough.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:



Correct

Wait, what is wrong with the countries they all came from?

Liberals All need to visit Haiti, Gaza, Cuba, etc. It should be required.
EVA3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

TommyBrady said:

FobTies said:

I dont care about Muslims being passionate about their faith and wanting to spread it. The problem is doing it in a country founded on Christian principles. Yes, there is "separation of church and state", but that just means gov cant impose a religion on its citizens. It does NOT mean our founding docs, Constitution, and country arent structured around Christianity. They can thrive as atheists or practicing Muslims in this country, but they will never remove Christianity from our history or future. At least not on the SEC states.


I care about Muslims wanting to spread their faith and anybody who cares about Christianity and the western would should as well. It is a religion of conquest.

Its not illegal for Muslims to share their faith, also nothing you can do about it. However, dismantling our Christian heritage or trying to displace our foundational Christian principles with Sharia, is totally different. Thats an offense that requires immediate action. We arent there yet. UK is. If it ever gets there here, we will do much more than internet post about it.

Muslims don't share their faith. They impose it.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Mecca isn't really the problem. The problem is our and Europe's tolerating violent activists. Ask Hollywood about what Saudi does to their anti-crown activists. There is a reason Bin Ladin was way away in Afghanistan.

In Mideast history, the rulers have generally simply removed such violent agitators. And contrary to some impressions, the Mideast states governed by strong men didn't too often start wars of jihad with Europe. Carter's handling of Iran made that into a special (disastrous) case.

Notice Obama's destabilization of Syria, Libya, and Egypt all produced greater threat. Egypt fortunately self-corrected.

We keep looking overseas when the problem is what the ruling class permits regarding Islamists. UK is an even better example of this currently.
El Chupacabra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ISIS only wishes they could destroy America as quickly and thoroughly as the Democrat party.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?


What could go wrong?
Bucketrunner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bobaloo said:

Just nuke Mecca. Problem solved. See if they will still talk tough.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:



What could go wrong?


No trans? No one in a wheelchair? No pink-haired white suburban woman wearing a BML shirt?

WTF kind of "socialist" are these?
TRX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

I dont care about Muslims being passionate about their faith and wanting to spread it. The problem is doing it in a country founded on Christian principles. Yes, there is "separation of church and state", but that just means gov cant impose a religion on its citizens. It does NOT mean our founding docs, Constitution, and country arent structured around Christianity. They can thrive as atheists or practicing Muslims in this country, but they will never remove Christianity from our history or displace it in our future. At least not in the States with all the guns.


There is no "separation of church and state" mentioned in the Constitution. It prevents the government from establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise of religion. It doesn't say anything about total separation. Big difference.
ULTRA MAGA
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

Blame muslims all you want but white liberals did this to us

They are the reason we have so many pedo worshipers here in the first place. They are the reason every major city has gone to sh** and they all have blood on their hands.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:



What could go wrong?

They are speaking foreign languages to inflame us. It's a spike of the football. And dammit, it works. I am fuming at what we are witnessing.

It's crazy, the last two times I was THIS affected by anything politically were the Charlie Kirk assassination and the attempt on Trump in Butler, PA. I never thought I would care so much about who won mayor of NYC but here we are. And it's not that I really care about NYC per se...it's the "canary in the coal mine".

A VERY troubling indicator. This country may just be a dead man walking.
SCHTICK00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

Blame muslims all you want but white liberals did this to us


They're on the same side with a common enemy, Christianity.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.