Mega Lops said:
Prop 4/HJR 7 vote no.
It is a disguised amendment that will be used to destroy the Texas coastal ecosystem under the auspices of making more water available for Texas.
Money spent on a marketing campaign to not move to Texas because we are running out of water would be better than an amendment that will make it easier to wreck the Texas coastal ecosystem under.
I've never seen anyone claim that it will destroy the coastal ecosystem until now, which seems like a serious exaggeration:
Arguments For and Against
In Favor (Broad support from water groups, biz leaders, and env. orgs like Sierra Club and Texas Water Foundation):
Locks in predictable funding for critical infrastructure, preventing future crises.
Ties to economic growth-more sales = more water investment-without raising taxes.
Addresses urgent needs: e.g., cleaning up polluted systems, expanding storage for droughts, and supporting rural areas. Endorsed as a "win for water security and economy."
Against (Limited organized opposition noted, but some fiscal hawks raise flags):
Reduces flexibility for general budget needs (e.g., education or roads) by earmarking funds.
Relies on continued sales tax growth; recessions could pause it.
20-year limit means it'll need renewal, and critics question if $20B is enough (or too much) without stronger oversight.