BBC 'doctored' Trump speech, internal report reveals

5,293 Views | 32 Replies | Last: 29 days ago by Gaeilge
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry, there is a paywall on this.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/03/bbc-report-reveals-bias-donald-trump/
Quote:

Quote:

Exclusive: BBC 'doctored' Trump speech, internal report reveals
Corporation edited footage to make it seem president was encouraging Capitol riot, according to whistleblowing dossier


Gordon Rayner, Associate Editor 03 November 2025 3:19pm GMT
The Telegraph


The BBC "doctored" a Donald Trump speech by making him appear to encourage the Capitol Hill riot, according to an internal whistleblowing memo seen by The Telegraph...




Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Ducks4brkfast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pleas lean into the topic, OP. We're gonna need an opinion. Really frame the discussion.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ducks4brkfast said:

Pleas lean into the topic, OP. We're gonna need an opinion. Really frame the discussion.

This. Are things like this...and intentionally removing Twitter messages from Trump pleading for peaceful protest and respect for authority and the capitol building...and weaponized federal agencies engaging in open election interference in favor of their preferred candidate in 2020..good, bad or neutral?

How are we to feel?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://smry.ai/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/03/bbc-report-reveals-bias-donald-trump/
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Surely if Trump was so bad, they wouldn't have to make things up?
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ducks4brkfast said:

Pleas lean into the topic, OP. We're gonna need an opinion. Really frame the discussion.


This, if the dossier being passed around Whitehall is correct, is a bombshell. If it happened to another problem it would blow over; however, the BBC, apparently, did it to Trump. Not sure what the recourse would be in British courts; however, here in the U.S. BBC could expect at a minimum a protracted law suit and potentially huge payout.

I look forward to future developments.

https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/2129249/bbc-accused-doctoring-trump-speech

Quote:

BBC accused of doctoring Trump speech as damning report published
A whistleblower's explosive memo has thrown the BBC into turmoil, accusing it of altering a Trump speech in a way that could change everything.

By Holly Fleet 16:18, Mon, Nov 3, 2025 Updated: 16:33, Mon, Nov 3, 2025


The BBC is facing a major storm after an explosive whistleblower memo accused the broadcaster of editing a Donald Trump speech in a way that made him appear to egg on the Capitol Hill riot. According to the 19-page dossier compiled by a former member of the BBC's own standards committee and now reportedly circulating through Whitehall, a Panorama episode aired just days before the 2024 US election "completely misled" viewers about what the former president actually said.

The programme, Trump: A Second Chance?, showed Mr Trump declaring he would march with supporters to the Capitol to "fight like hell". However, the memo claims that the film spliced together two separate parts of his speech, an hour apart, and omitted the section where he urged crowds to "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard".

The document brands the edit "mangled", accusing the flagship BBC investigation of making the former president "say things he never actually said" and presenting dramatic footage of flag-waving protesters marching on the Capitol as if it were the direct result of his words. In reality, the scenes were reportedly filmed before Mr Trump even took the stage.

According to The Telegraph the dossier also alleges that senior BBC chiefs brushed off serious complaints raised internally about the broadcast....

.....


Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That video edit is just horrible.

Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Martels Hammer said:





bwahahahahahahahaha

That might be worse than the CBS Kamala edit.

Libs lie, hate, destroy and murder. Their father is Satan himself.
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They never thought he'd win. Again.
CampSkunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like Trump is going to be on the path to collect another large check from a media company. One caveat - Britain is not a big supporter of free speech, and he may not be able to collect in that place. I presume he'll be able to make a claim for damages or fraud, even though relatively few US voters will have seen the Panorama video. But some may have.
Gator92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big Beautiful Library just got bigger and more beautiful...
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Imagine a foreign network so powerful that it had to doctor footage of 5 year old material to prevent a reelection 4 years later, and we are only just finding out about it 1 year after the president was actually reelected
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder if YouTube is going to deplatform them for violating community guidlines on deceptive editing?

I got deplatformed for much less, and didnt even have a following. Google is just as bad as Twitter before Elon tookover. But unlike Twitter, Google has more power and influence.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So did Twitter at the time under Jack and the mainstream news media.
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Couple cruise missiles would keep that from happening again
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Martels Hammer said:



Couldn't be better timing for me. Watched the original Running Man movie with my son last night. You know the movie where the central government and its TV allies did the exact same doctoring to set up Arnold. He knows the Biden regime was FOS, but this is better to show it's our "allies" as well.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

Ducks4brkfast said:

Pleas lean into the topic, OP. We're gonna need an opinion. Really frame the discussion.

This. Are things like this...and intentionally removing Twitter messages from Trump pleading for peaceful protest and respect for authority and the capitol building...and weaponized federal agencies engaging in open election interference in favor of their preferred candidate in 2020..good, bad or neutral?

How are we to feel?

Big media globally are generally the enemies of liberty and the survival of Western Civ these days. The exceptions just prove the rule and wouldn't take too long to be listed.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?


KerrAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
See ya, good start!!
Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Resign is just code for promotion.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem is at the BBC board.

Quote:

the Board is led by a non-executive Chair, Samir Shah, and consists of ten non-executive members, including the Chair, and four executive members including the BBC's Director-General and Editor-in-Chief, Tim Davie, who chairs the Executive Committee.

Four of the non-executive members are specifically appointed as members for each of the nations of the UK.
The Chairman and the non-executive members for the nations are appointed by HM The King on the recommendation of Ministers while the other members of the Board are appointed by the BBC through the Board's Nominations and Governance committee.



https://www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/whoweare/bbcboard
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Almost the entirety of the worldwide media are nothing but leftists.
Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?

GeeBee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you can't say ****** anymore? Everyone is protected accept for a certain race. Let's see what the hate speech filter is set to on here for the following:

Cracker A racial slur, often directed at poor rural white people, particularly in the Southern United States.

Honky A derogatory term predominantly heard in the United States, used to refer to white people.
Whitey A pejorative term for a white person.

Redneck A classist and regional insult for a "backward" or "barely-educated" person, typically a white person from the rural Southern or Appalachian United States.
GeeBee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of unfettered racist hate slipping past the filters!!! How will we survive?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Globally, far more than not, the established Media is an enemy of the forces of liberty and personal freedom.
Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But wait, theres more




More incidents from the usual suspects.
Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ooopsie. The "error" happened more than once.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBC is getting absolutely ratio'd on Twitter!!
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.