If the three closest public personalities to Charlie Kirk

4,758 Views | 48 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by titan
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sam callahan said:

No. But when I hear that someone voted for Harris, Biden, or Clinton it immediately affects my perception of them.


Nm
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

Charlie was married to Erika Kirk. Based on my observations about how they treated each other, and the 10's of thousands of hours of videos of Kirk arguing with college students, he likely didn't have a single bone in his body that was hateful.

The antisemites that was to go crazy with Charlie Kirk's memory, are just that, crazy. Same goes with the people that want to paint him as some crazy Zionist. Both those arguments are dumb.


They never thought that CK's voice and reach would grow stronger in death. They expected his impact to fade away. That was a gross miscalculation on their part, they're dumbass progs and too stupid to realize that they only made him stronger.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Update on this. Kind of a surprising one. This rift is real. Mark Levin on his show today, now, just called out various right wing podcasters as favoring anti-semitism, and using Buckley as an example, discussed how this has happened before and how it was Buckley that called out friends then. Among the ones listed, first and no surprise and true basically from what see anti-semite are Candace Owens, next (a little more brashly but he is getting odd) Tucker Carlson, but the real stunner was -- Megyn Kelly!?! This puts Kirk's stance in a strange place - did Levin think the same of him??

Some really nutty things going on just now. Madness
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I just don't think a sort of effeminate kid named Brilyn Hollyhand wearing a Masters polo is going to become the next Charlie Kirk. He seems like a totally fake d bag and his name is just too much. His parents are d bags for naming him that.

Likely unfair of me, but that's my initial impression.

I also really didn't know who Charlie Kirk was until he was killed so my opinion doesn't count for much here.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Levin despises Tucker Carlson

Carlson has said some horrific things about Levin and lies all the time. Carlson is bought and paid for by someone, probably Qatar.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Yeah, picked up on that firmly. It was Megyn Kelly being lumped in that surprised. But that reminded of the little scuffle where Kirk was having to fend off such.
murphyag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

This is literally as anti-Tucker view as you can get:




Never head Kirk carry water for Sharia law either:




On domestic issues, I suspect Kirk and Carlson had most everything in common. But Carlson has become a loon on foreign issue. Kirk never endorsed any of that nonsense.



What do you think happened to Tucker? Why has he become A loon?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fat Black Swan said:

For reference, this was where he began.



Just reading that, Charlie was different gravy. I don't think there's going to be anyone who can "replace" him or even come close to what he did on the national stage. He was a unique generational talent. I probably won't see another Charlie Kirk in my lifetime.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ProgN said:

Any and all you listed will never be CK, but are magnitudes better than any progressive that has infected the democrat party. Ck worshipped Christ, progs follow satan (I'll never capitalize that pos) and demonic.

The best explanation for people to truly understand the left is that they're demonic. They are the evil of our time.
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:


Update on this. Kind of a surprising one. This rift is real. Mark Levin on his show today, now, just called out various right wing podcasters as favoring anti-semitism, and using Buckley as an example, discussed how this has happened before and how it was Buckley that called out friends then. Among the ones listed, first and no surprise and true basically from what see anti-semite are Candace Owens, next (a little more brashly but he is getting odd) Tucker Carlson, but the real stunner was -- Megyn Kelly!?! This puts Kirk's stance in a strange place - did Levin think the same of him??

Some really nutty things going on just now. Madness

Obvious Levin is Isarael first. All makes sense as to why he was such a big Cruz guy. Not that it's bad everyone can have their opinion. Levin is a really smart guy but his dream is and always has been that we team up with Isarael and have ww3 with Islam. He despises anyone that's not Isarael first that's why he hated Michael Savage as well.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

What do you mean by "closest public personalities"? Like friends? Or same views?


If the former, I really wouldn't care. People have all kind of different friends. See Scalia and Ginsberg.

If you mean the latter, I reject that as being accurate. I can't speak for the other two, but Kirk and Carlson had clearly very different view on Israel and the Middle East.


100%

the people who knew Charlie Kirk the BEST were his immediate staff at TPUSA who saw him every single day.

they all report there was ZERO relationship with Crazy Candace and that Charlie believed in the letter he sent to Prime Minister Netanyahu, where he pledged that he was always a strong friend of Israel and Zionism.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Carlson made some very specific accusations about Levin, accusing him of forcing Trump's hand on Israel and things like that. Levin vehemently denies the accusations in no uncertain terms.
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

Im Gipper said:

What do you mean by "closest public personalities"? Like friends? Or same views?


If the former, I really wouldn't care. People have all kind of different friends. See Scalia and Ginsberg.

If you mean the latter, I reject that as being accurate. I can't speak for the other two, but Kirk and Carlson had clearly very different view on Israel and the Middle East.


100%

the people who knew Charlie Kirk the BEST were his immediate staff at TPUSA who saw him every single day.

they all report there was ZERO relationship with Crazy Candace and that Charlie believed in the letter he sent to Prime Minister Netanyahu, where he pledged that he was always a strong friend of Israel and Zionism.


Edit:there really needs to be a way to edit emojis.

Candace has nothing to do with the three that I named. She's in the same loony boat as Loomer.

Shapiro and Levin discussed their frustration with Charlie and TPUSA that had been going on for a few months. Thinking back, the issue might not have even been having Carlson speak, it was probably hosting Dave Smith at a TPUSA event in July. That was the one that set off Loomer.

Shapiro still had a good relationship with Charlie while disagreeing on a number of things. Seemed like Levin had grown more frustrated.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fat Black Swan said:

LMCane said:

Im Gipper said:

What do you mean by "closest public personalities"? Like friends? Or same views?


If the former, I really wouldn't care. People have all kind of different friends. See Scalia and Ginsberg.

If you mean the latter, I reject that as being accurate. I can't speak for the other two, but Kirk and Carlson had clearly very different view on Israel and the Middle East.


100%

the people who knew Charlie Kirk the BEST were his immediate staff at TPUSA who saw him every single day.

they all report there was ZERO relationship with Crazy Candace and that Charlie believed in the letter he sent to Prime Minister Netanyahu, where he pledged that he was always a strong friend of Israel and Zionism.


Edit:there really needs to be a way to edit emojis.

Candace has nothing to do with the three that I named. She's in the same loony boat as Loomer.

Shapiro and Levin discussed their frustration with Charlie and TPUSA that had been going on for a few months. Thinking back, the issue might not have even been having Carlson speak, it was probably hosting Dave Smith at a TPUSA event in July. That was the one that set off Loomer.

Shapiro still had a good relationship with Charlie while disagreeing on a number of things. Seemed like Levin had grown more frustrated.



Well that sheds some light. So a bit of rift with Charlie began over the precipitous Iran bombing -- do recall Charlie wing being more ambivalent about that. This also explains and affirms why Levin would lump Megyn Kelly in the way did, because she is certainly aligned more with the Charlie Kirk view.

Hmmm.

Gotta love Shapiro's delivery and clarity "problem with maintaining a big tent is ---" ---- "you may end up with many many clowns inside"

But would not put some doubts about the abruptness and forcefulness of that action with absolute nuts like the moon landing deniers.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.