japantiger said:

---

Shooter not cooperating with authorities

https://www.foxnews.com/media/charlie-kirks-alleged-shooter-not-cooperating-authorities-utah-gov-cox-says

---

Embedded

Utah Governor says Tyler Robinson: “has not confessed to authorities. He is not cooperating…”

Everyone else is cooperating and working with law enforcement.

“We can confirm that his roommate was a boyfriend, who is transitioning from male to female.”

pic.twitter.com/x1gIEfjd1f

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) September 14, 2025

That's not unusual. Its a choice can make. However, if it means they have the fact that he is hiding the plans of others, than treat him under 9/11 terrorist precedents. Depends on context.

There's rumors that his trans boyfriend has now been arrested.

I'm not one to jump on rumors or Twitter posts but the more that comes out the weirder things get but keep staying true at the same time

The Guardian had to publish a retraction. Amateur hour. WSJ too. So ready to get a scoop that they will take in disinformation.

It is definitely about God. They have no sense of right and wrong because without God, everything is arbitrary. America has been great because a belief in God is a moral code that tells us all that we are not the biggest thing in the universe. Every single one of these people believes they are the center of the universe and their ethos is right. No one can tell them otherwise.

Take your kids to church. Teach them to submit to Christ. Tell them to follow the teachings of Jesus and to love one another. It's a radical message, and it's what is missing in the lives of these dangerous people.

Yep but the libs saying he was alt right haven't made any retractions and admitted they were duped

My question is why they, assassin and trans boyfriend, both seemed relatively absent from social media after 2022? That or they created new accounts that arent as easily found or are private.

It is very abnormal for people who are online gamers as their identities, in niche online cliques and that weird to have simply stopped their own online trail. I mean they both seemed to have disappeared from their family social media too at about that same exact time

Most likely stayed insulated entirely in Discord communities for their online footprint. Really amplify that echo chamber.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Yep but the libs saying he was alt right haven't made any retractions and admitted they were duped

---

There is a big difference between individuals on X posting disinformation and the WSJ and the Guardian posting disinformation.

Please post up your links of the "libs" media organizations disseminating disinformation.

Btw, the kid who was "riding with my bike" - btw who says that, who the one time he is riding by, seems them kiss and also hears them talking about coming out and getting an operation. You think that kid is credible?

shiftyandquick said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

Yep but the libs saying he was alt right haven't made any retractions and admitted they were duped

---

There is a big difference between individuals on X posting disinformation and the WSJ and the Guardian posting disinformation.

Please post up your links of the "libs" media organizations disseminating disinformation.

Btw, the kid who was "riding with my bike" - btw who says that, who the one time he is riding by, seems them kiss and also hears them talking about coming out and getting an operation. You think that kid is credible?

---

You arent winning.

Utah Governor says Tyler Robinson: “has not confessed to authorities. He is not cooperating…”

Everyone else is cooperating and working with law enforcement.

“We can confirm that his roommate was a boyfriend, who is transitioning from male to female.”

pic.twitter.com/x1gIEfjd1f

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) September 14, 2025

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/tyler-robinson-nick-fuentes-row-activist-responds-to-new-claims-on-charlie-kirk-shooter-101757714315330-amp.html

David Shuster an msnbc person posted the tweet that then led to the article. He never has retracted it.

No I don't. I posted that I hate the "friends said" bs on another thread. I think it's bs and should never be used unless there is tons of confirmation that they were friends and there are other things that back up their story.

The Shuster tweet is still being used as proof. It's on a Reddit where they are loving it and believing it. Actually the Reddit has the same tweet you used to try and say he was alt right. lol.

backintexas2013 said:

---

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/tyler-robinson-nick-fuentes-row-activist-responds-to-new-claims-on-charlie-kirk-shooter-101757714315330-amp.html

David Shuster an msnbc person posted the tweet that then led to the article. He never has retracted it.

No I don't. I posted that I hate the "friends said" bs on another thread. I think it's bs and should never be used unless there is tons of confirmation that they were friends and there are other things that back up their story.

The Shuster tweet is still being used as proof. It's on a Reddit where they are loving it and believing it. Actually the Reddit has the same tweet you used to try and say he was alt right. lol.

---

I don't consider that source to be credible from the get go.

You got any real media? After all, isn't 99% of the US media liberal? Surely you have one media outlet (not just one guy on X) that needs to retract?

He is an MSNBC news anchor. It was what the left used to say he was alt right. You asked and I provided.

I notice you won't admit you were duped. Typical leftist.

Guardian had to retract and they are libs. They believed the idiot "friend" story because it fit what all the other clues were.

Am I the only one who questions how this 22 year old dweeb had the ability to pull this off from 200 yards away? Are we sure he isn't just a patsy?

If I'm late to the party in posting this question, apologies…

He has hunting experience. And it was 142 yards, not 200. That is not a hard shot at all with a scoped rifle, which he kind of missed anyway. No way was the neck his target.

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Dad is LEO. Hunting experience. And it more like 140 yards. That is not a hard shot with a scoped rifle, which he kind of missed anyway. No way was the neck his target.

---

No dad is not

backintexas2013 said:

---

He is an MSNBC news anchor. It was what the left used to say he was alt right. You asked and I provided.

I notice you won't admit you were duped. Typical leftist.

Guardian had to retract and they are libs. They believed the idiot "friend" story because it fit what all the other clues were.

---

According to wikipedia, Shuster is a former employee of MSNBC.

If this is incorrect, let me know. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

TAMUallen said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Dad is LEO. Hunting experience. And it more like 140 yards. That is not a hard shot with a scoped rifle, which he kind of missed anyway. No way was the neck his target.

---

No dad is not

---

My bad, wrong Matt Robinson. Corrected. The rest seems to be accurate, particularly the distance. Even a rube with a remotely moderate amount of practice could make that shot with a properly sighted rifle

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

backintexas2013 said:

---

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

---

I did not and do not know "what" he is.

I'm not going to apologize for posting that tweet, because I thought that tweet was highly relevant to the discussion going on about what is motivations were.

The tweet suggested he may have had affinity for a meme that was/is used for followers of Fuentes.

So what exactly am I supposed to apologize for? Amplifying this tweet by posting it here?

Well, as it turns out, enjoying playing hide the doggie with his trans lover seems to now be the most relevant

shiftyandquick said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

---

I did not and do not know "what" he is.

I'm not going to apologize for posting that tweet, because I thought that tweet was highly relevant to the discussion going on about what is motivations were.

The tweet suggested he may have had affinity for a meme that was/is used for followers of Fuentes.

So what exactly am I supposed to apologize for? Amplifying this tweet by posting it here?

---

Still holding the rope hoping that this homosexual in a relationship with a cross dressing man who killed a "fascist" is somehow a member of the alt-right? Ok

There are more fruitcakes about to get rolled up in this. I'm convinced a lot knew. We'll see what can be tied to them as far as conspiracy

zoneag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

---

I did not and do not know "what" he is.

I'm not going to apologize for posting that tweet, because I thought that tweet was highly relevant to the discussion going on about what is motivations were.

The tweet suggested he may have had affinity for a meme that was/is used for followers of Fuentes.

So what exactly am I supposed to apologize for? Amplifying this tweet by posting it here?

---

Still holding the rope hoping that this homosexual in a relationship with a cross dressing man who killed a "fascist" is somehow a member of the alt-right? Ok

---

No I'm not planning to use his identity as a political weapon.

The same cannot be said of the President. Who used the identity of the killer as a political weapon before he even knew who the killer was.

When his identity is his motive, it is as relevant as anything can possibly be.

This is looneyville.

How many people, in what organizations knew about this assassination, or could have, ahead of time?

I think we know that 6 people on Reddit were recipients of messages.

I do not believe know how many of the 6 read them before the event. https://t.co/Pv2uwbRLt4

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 14, 2025

Haven't followed the news much today, but it sounds like multiple groups are/have deleted their history trying to hide information. Obstruction of justice?

This is Armed Queers of Salt Lake City. They help to arm, train, and recruit in Utah. They deleted their account on September 10th. pic.twitter.com/jT6ILJrPLQ

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 14, 2025

The internet is forever, twits.

The Armed Queers of SLC lol

shiftyandquick said:

---

The Guardian had to publish a retraction. Amateur hour. WSJ too. So ready to get a scoop that they will take in disinformation.

---

You should sit this one out

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Well, as it turns out, enjoying playing hide the doggie with his trans lover seems to now be the most relevant

---

Tummy sticks

shiftyandquick said:

---

zoneag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

---

I did not and do not know "what" he is.

I'm not going to apologize for posting that tweet, because I thought that tweet was highly relevant to the discussion going on about what is motivations were.

The tweet suggested he may have had affinity for a meme that was/is used for followers of Fuentes.

So what exactly am I supposed to apologize for? Amplifying this tweet by posting it here?

---

Still holding the rope hoping that this homosexual in a relationship with a cross dressing man who killed a "fascist" is somehow a member of the alt-right? Ok

---

No I'm not planning to use his identity as a political weapon.

The same cannot be said of the President. Who used the identity of the killer as a political weapon before he even knew who the killer was.

---

You were wrong. Take the L.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Yep but the libs saying he was alt right haven't made any retractions and admitted they were duped

---

And they wont, only thing that will fix that is defamation lawsuits.

shiftyandquick said:

---

zoneag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

---

I did not and do not know "what" he is. Just take the L and move on.

I'm not going to apologize for posting that tweet, because I thought that tweet was highly relevant to the discussion going on about what is motivations were.

The tweet suggested he may have had affinity for a meme that was/is used for followers of Fuentes.

So what exactly am I supposed to apologize for? Amplifying this tweet by posting it here?

---

Still holding the rope hoping that this homosexual in a relationship with a cross dressing man who killed a "fascist" is somehow a member of the alt-right? Ok

---

No I'm not planning to use his identity as a political weapon.

The same cannot be said of the President. Who used the identity of the killer as a political weapon before he even knew who the killer was.

---

But he got it right, didn't he? Just take the L and move on.

2000AgPhD said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

zoneag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

---

I did not and do not know "what" he is. Just take the L and move on.

I'm not going to apologize for posting that tweet, because I thought that tweet was highly relevant to the discussion going on about what is motivations were.

The tweet suggested he may have had affinity for a meme that was/is used for followers of Fuentes.

So what exactly am I supposed to apologize for? Amplifying this tweet by posting it here?

---

Still holding the rope hoping that this homosexual in a relationship with a cross dressing man who killed a "fascist" is somehow a member of the alt-right? Ok

---

No I'm not planning to use his identity as a political weapon.

The same cannot be said of the President. Who used the identity of the killer as a political weapon before he even knew who the killer was.

---

But he got it right, didn't he? Just take the L and move on.

---

Very very few have the ability to do that from what I've seen so far. They are struggling with the ability to even be decent.

The tweet wasn't ever proven true. His mom said it was a meme. The person said it was alt right so you ran with it. There was a poster who posted a better timeline. When questioned you made it sound like the tweet was true. It wasn't. It's some Reddit loser hoping it was true. Anyone who believed that was stupid just like taking stock in "friend said" is stupid.

You and others hinted or outright said it was alt right. He wasn't. He is a hardcore lib.

The guy shot an innocent man and the left celebrated and tried to pin it on alt right. Even though there was zero credible evidence he was.

Alt right are morons but he isn't one of them. Sounds much more likely he was alphabet soup moron.

shiftyandquick said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

You are correct. I will own it. Only liberal paper with a retraction was The Guardian.

I will own my mistakes unlike you. You ever going to admit he wasn't alt right? You posted a random stupid tweet you most likely found on Reddit.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

---

I did not and do not know "what" he is.

I'm not going to apologize for posting that tweet, because I thought that tweet was highly relevant to the discussion going on about what is motivations were.

The tweet suggested he may have had affinity for a meme that was/is used for followers of Fuentes.

So what exactly am I supposed to apologize for? Amplifying this tweet by posting it here?

---

He's a *** who was dating a ******. That's not MAGA. Get your head out of your ass.

He was a leftist following ******ed instructions from ******ed MSM and Liberal messaging.