HECUBUS said:

---

It's a country club. I used to deliver news papers there and learned about options trading from a guy waiting outside on the front porch for his newspaper every morning. His paper never got into the vending machine and I would use his change to open it up and load the rest.

---

Can you imagine what it must be like to have help cause such horrific atrocities for children, and then, thanks to the president of the United States having an interest in you, being taken out of a prison and moved to a place that is considered a dream placement for any criminal?

If that isn't privileged, or what some are saying is being bought for her cooperation, I don't know what is.

Or maybe since she is considered a non violent offender and is not a flight risk they do what most states do and I assume the feds do with all female prisoners and base her placement off three factors

1.) violent offense or not?
2.) risk yo reoffend
3.) flight risk.

Female prisoners are given way more preferential treatment but I am sure people who don't know the criminal justice system just blame the president.

She was at the game last night rooting for UF….

TyHolden said:

---

She was at the game last night rooting for UF….

---

Tim Tebow is on the list. Steve Spurrier said so.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Or maybe since she is considered a non violent offender and is not a flight risk they do what most states do and I assume the feds do with all female prisoners and base her placement off three factors

1.) violent offense or not?
2.) risk yo reoffend
3.) flight risk.

Female prisoners are given way more preferential treatment but I am sure people who don't know the criminal justice system just blame the president.

---

Had this been the first place she was sent to, and not moved to during a time (before or after) where she met with one of the presidents employees, that might make a lot more sense.

Years ago I lead some church worship services there with my wife.

I was very surprised how easy it would be to leave that
facility. You can essentially go where ever you want on the property. As well, it would be very easy to enter that facility.

Two things come to mind with the timing of this transfer. I guess it all really depends on how much G-Max does know:

1) She could break out of this facility (easily) one evening and be in Mexico in 6 hours.

2) It would be very easy for someone to enter the facility…or take a shot from the fence line. Nothing but neighborhoods surrounding the property.

Consider me suspect of the transfer.

Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:

---

Years ago I lead some church worship services there with my wife.

I was very surprised how easy it would be to leave that
facility. You can essentially go where ever you want on the property. As well, it would be very easy to enter that facility.

Two things come to mind with the timing of this transfer. I guess it all really depends on how much G-Max does know:

1) She could break out of this facility (easily) one evening and be in Mexico in 6 hours.

2) It would be very easy for someone to enter the facility…or take a shot from the fence line. Nothing but neighborhoods surrounding the property.

Consider me suspect of the transfer.

---

She has leverage, that's the only reason she was transferred. Its not deep

samurai_science said:

---

Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:

---

Years ago I lead some church worship services there with my wife.

I was very surprised how easy it would be to leave that
facility. You can essentially go where ever you want on the property. As well, it would be very easy to enter that facility.

Two things come to mind with the timing of this transfer. I guess it all really depends on how much G-Max does know:

1) She could break out of this facility (easily) one evening and be in Mexico in 6 hours.

2) It would be very easy for someone to enter the facility…or take a shot from the fence line. Nothing but neighborhoods surrounding the property.

Consider me suspect of the transfer.

---

She has leverage, that's the only reason she was transferred. Its not deep

---

Yeah, but is it deep state?

Except usually everyone starts in intake and the. Gets moved. Sometimes multiple times. Do some research. Understand criminal justice systems.

Let me help you. There are female capital offenders in non secure facilities all over the country. They didn't start there they got sent there.

In Texas the female offenders all start the same place which is max security. Even if there for non violent they start there. Then go where they are most appropriate based on levels. As inmates move through the system they can even go to trustee camps that are wide open. This is true in almost every state.


Without looking tell me what level she started in. Let me give you a hint it wasn't max security

titan said:

---

Remain rather unconvinced there `are' "files" in the conventional sense of some copious dossier kept on everyone involved like something from Rheihard Heydrich's collection that he kept.

Am half-way of the view that they discovered to their embarrassment no such stack of smoking gun papers exist any more if they ever did, and yet they can't figure out how to just come clean about it without looking stupid.

Another half thinks there may be something to all the podcast chatter about connections to Mossad, because if anything would lead to coordinated cover-up by both sides of aisle, its something like that.

---

Agreed Titan. If there was anything incriminating against Trump, anything at all, you can bet Biden and the Dems would have released it when they were in power.

Why is she in jail?

She isn't she is in federal prison because she was sentenced to 20 years. No pardon has been given.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Except usually everyone starts in intake and the. Gets moved. Sometimes multiple times. Do some research. Understand criminal justice systems.

Let me help you. There are female capital offenders in non secure facilities all over the country. They didn't start there they got sent there.

In Texas the female offenders all start the same place which is max security. Even if there for non violent they start there. Then go where they are most appropriate based on levels. As inmates move through the system they can even go to trustee camps that are wide open. This is true in almost every state.


Without looking tell me what level she started in. Let me give you a hint it wasn't max security

---

I appreciate the sharing of knowledge.

So do you think, in all honesty, that it's not at all possible that she was moved to where she is currently at because she met with Trump's people? That the timing is purely 100%, coincidence?

Don't know also don't know the reason requested. She was already in low security. There are a bunch of reasons people get moved Threat of violence from inmates is another common reason

I never assume bad intentions on either side when it's something this minor. She gets pardoned or commuted then that's an issue but don't care where she is as long as locked up.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Or maybe since she is considered a non violent offender and is not a flight risk they do what most states do and I assume the feds do with all female prisoners and base her placement off three factors

1.) violent offense or not?
2.) risk yo reoffend
3.) flight risk.

Female prisoners are given way more preferential treatment but I am sure people who don't know the criminal justice system just blame the president.

---

You have to admit that the timing was suspicious at best.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Don't know also don't know the reason requested. She was already in low security. There are a bunch of reasons people get moved Threat of violence from inmates is another common reason

I never assume bad intentions on either side when it's something this minor. She gets pardoned or commuted then that's an issue but don't care where she is as long as locked up.

---

Her helping bring young girls to be abused by men is something minor? If so, I guess I see what she did in a much different lens than you.

If my daughter had been abused because she was part of the reason, I'd tear her apart with my bare hands as soon as I was finished tearing whatever man touched my little girl.

It's being said on social media that now that Trump has commuted George, Trump giving Ghislaine a full pardon is next.

As if by commuting Santos it'll make him pardoning Maxwell seem more like something routine, and not something that will personally benefit him.

No Spin Ag said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

Don't know also don't know the reason requested. She was already in low security. There are a bunch of reasons people get moved Threat of violence from inmates is another common reason

I never assume bad intentions on either side when it's something this minor. She gets pardoned or commuted then that's an issue but don't care where she is as long as locked up.

---

Her helping bring young girls to be abused by men is something minor? If so, I guess I see what she did in a much different lens than you.

If my daughter had been abused because she was part of the reason, I'd tear her apart with my bare hands as soon as I was finished tearing whatever man touched my little girl.

---

Drive over there and get it done. Why are those little girls who were touched and abused less worthy of your justice than your own daughter?

If you really had it in you to do what you say, you would be climbing the fence in Bryan as we speak.

Rather than pretend you are a valiant soldier championing the cause of bringing justice to sex offenders, put the keyboard down and get to work. It's just a suggestion and maybe you do lots already in this area - and kudos to you if so. Let me know how I can help.

I would be interested in that social media rationale for connecting Santos, a guy who swindled some money from his family and friends and who had big problems with honesty, had his sentence commuted after serving time… is comparable to Maxwell who is at the heart of a supposedly bipartisan scandal involving the rich & powerful.

I don't see a pardon for her. Stranger things have happened. Unless she coughs up something big, I imagine she will just continue to move along to various prisons until her time is up or President Chelsea Clinton decides to pardon her in order to protect her dad.

flown-the-coop said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

Don't know also don't know the reason requested. She was already in low security. There are a bunch of reasons people get moved Threat of violence from inmates is another common reason

I never assume bad intentions on either side when it's something this minor. She gets pardoned or commuted then that's an issue but don't care where she is as long as locked up.

---

Her helping bring young girls to be abused by men is something minor? If so, I guess I see what she did in a much different lens than you.

If my daughter had been abused because she was part of the reason, I'd tear her apart with my bare hands as soon as I was finished tearing whatever man touched my little girl.

---

Drive over there and get it done. Why are those little girls who were touched and abused less worthy of your justice than your own daughter?

If you really had it in you to do what you say, you would be climbing the fence in Bryan as we speak.

Rather than pretend you are a valiant soldier championing the cause of bringing justice to sex offenders, put the keyboard down and get to work. It's just a suggestion and maybe you do lots already in this area - and kudos to you if so. Let me know how I can help.

I would be interested in that social media rationale for connecting Santos, a guy who swindled some money from his family and friends and who had big problems with honesty, had his sentence commuted after serving time… is comparable to Maxwell who is at the heart of a supposedly bipartisan scandal involving the rich & powerful.

I don't see a pardon for her. Stranger things have happened. Unless she coughs up something big, I imagine she will just continue to move along to various prisons until her time is up or President Chelsea Clinton decides to pardon her in order to protect her dad.

---

Just keep fighting for abused children in any way you can. I'm very close with people who work in CPS, so things like this hit home for me. I've given money and time to help kids, so all I would ask is just do what you can when you can.

As for President Chelsea...God help us all if that were ever to happen.

I support you in your efforts.

Ghislaine was just a piece in the puzzle of Epstein. What evidence or knowledge she holds onto could be damming, could be nothing.

I am not defending Ghislaine by bringing up her tenuous childhood and young adult life, but she was certainly a wounded bird by the time she made Epstein and was reared to be a manipulator, conspirator, exploiter of people.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/19/ghislaine-maxwell-lawyers-sentencing-childhood-emotional-neglect-abuse

I personally feel she belongs in solitary confinement and then only after she reveals every bit of knowledge she knows. For refusing to talk at this point, I am fine with the gallows or a drone delivery of her last meal.

Looks of female crooks moving to Bryan, TX.

Does A&M have a rehab program or something?

Yes, it's staffed with H1Bs and run by big corporate pharma with taxpayer money. You would hate it.

But why a Bureau of Prisons facility is located somewhere is typically explained by when the facility was acquired / constructed, who the congressman for the district was, and what their vote was needed for in return for this pork spending.

flown-the-coop said:

---

I support you in your efforts.

Ghislaine was just a piece in the puzzle of Epstein. What evidence or knowledge she holds onto could be damming, could be nothing.

I am not defending Ghislaine by bringing up her tenuous childhood and young adult life, but she was certainly a wounded bird by the time she made Epstein and was reared to be a manipulator, conspirator, exploiter of people.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/19/ghislaine-maxwell-lawyers-sentencing-childhood-emotional-neglect-abuse

I personally feel she belongs in solitary confinement and then only after she reveals every bit of knowledge she knows. For refusing to talk at this point, I am fine with the gallows or a drone delivery of her last meal.

---

Preach

No Spin Ag said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

I support you in your efforts.

Ghislaine was just a piece in the puzzle of Epstein. What evidence or knowledge she holds onto could be damming, could be nothing.

I am not defending Ghislaine by bringing up her tenuous childhood and young adult life, but she was certainly a wounded bird by the time she made Epstein and was reared to be a manipulator, conspirator, exploiter of people.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/19/ghislaine-maxwell-lawyers-sentencing-childhood-emotional-neglect-abuse

I personally feel she belongs in solitary confinement and then only after she reveals every bit of knowledge she knows. For refusing to talk at this point, I am fine with the gallows or a drone delivery of her last meal.

---

Preach

---

She certainly isn't going to tell everything she knows, which is likely what got her into that cushy spot and will secure her pardon eventually.

We're hearing Ghislaine Maxwell is planning to plead the 5th at her deposition on Monday.

When a convicted sex trafficker pleads the fifth it isn’t about about self-incrimination any more, it’s self-preservation and not wanting to cross the rich and powerful people she…

— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) February 4, 2026

Need to give her immunity for this testimony:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/6005

Did they move her out of Bryan yet?

Did Rusty cry?

Quote:

---

Need to give her immunity for this testimony:

---

Immunity won't keep her from getting epsteined. Silence probably won't either, but it has a way better chance

Im Gipper said:

---

We're hearing Ghislaine Maxwell is planning to plead the 5th at her deposition on Monday.

When a convicted sex trafficker pleads the fifth it isn’t about about self-incrimination any more, it’s self-preservation and not wanting to cross the rich and powerful people she…

— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) February 4, 2026

Need to give her immunity for this testimony:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/6005

---

Isn't she fighting the conviction right now? If so, it makes sense that she'd take the 5th to protect herself, doesn't it?

Quote:

---

Isn't she fighting the conviction right now? If so, it makes sense that she'd take the 5th to protect herself, doesn't it?

---

I thought she had exhausted all of her appeals, but don't know for sure.


Either way, no one said it didn't make sense to plead the fifth. I would too if in her shoes!


Hence, why she should be given immunity for her testimony!

NEW: After invoking the 5th Amendment during today's deposition, Maxwell's attorney says that she is prepared to speak if Donald Trump grants her clemency. https://t.co/zH016VkUds

— Aaron Parnas (@AaronParnas) February 9, 2026

HELL NO On clemency!!

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Isn't she fighting the conviction right now? If so, it makes sense that she'd take the 5th to protect herself, doesn't it?

---

I thought she had exhausted all of her appeals, but don't know for sure.


Either way, no one said it didn't make sense to plead the fifth. I would too if in her shoes!


Hence, why she should be given immunity for her testimony!

---

Only if she gives testimony against those as evil, or more, than her which leads to their conviction

That's not how that works.

That woman better not get any clemency whatsoever.

The only one that could forgive her is God himself. There should be no forgiveness here on Earth.

There are a ***load of (probably) men with their names redacted. Remove those redactions. That is the point of the law.

The victims are too terrified to speak out because of how powerful these men are. They botched the redactions so badly that they revealed new victims, who have been hidden until now. And still covered up men's names. Unforgiveable.

Take them all down. All perpetrators.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Or maybe since she is considered a non violent offender and is not a flight risk they do what most states do and I assume the feds do with all female prisoners and base her placement off three factors

1.) violent offense or not?
2.) risk yo reoffend
3.) flight risk.

Female prisoners are given way more preferential treatment but I am sure people who don't know the criminal justice system just blame the president.

---

Child exploitation is a violent act
Against the child and is considered as such in the sentencing guidelines

Ffs don't goal tend for this piece of trash with the victimless it was a non violent crime nonsense

Clemency promise for full unending and complete disclosure. In public, not behind closed doors. Then, simply accuse her of not being forthcoming and cancel the deal.