Sec Buttigieg prioritized DEI over your safety.

6,008 Views | 56 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by David_Puddy
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I wouldn't say it's misleading. It's pointing to the total dumbassery of this particular moron.

My quibble is the use of the word "capability" in terms of capacity only. There's a difference.

Oh, I don't disagree with you. It's an insanely dumb reason, and makes zero sense.

The report says that is the reason the dumbass didn't fix the ATC system. When one is full of the dumbass, this is the **** that happens. People die.
LOL OLD
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shocked!!!

El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I used to say liberalism is a cancer. But maybe it's liberals who are the cancer? How do we fix this, aside from peaceful separation? They make cities and states less safe for our children. They threaten to completely upend our nation and out culture. They are the greatest threat and enemy we face.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Courtesy Flush said:

OK. I don't dispute that he funneled money to BS causes but I want to know what the current administration is doing to redirect those funds. Has the Trump administration directed additional funds so that more planes can safely fly? I don't necessarily discourage reflecting on the mess that the previous administration caused, but I am more interested to know what is being done today to fix it.


Odd flex

Get to the bottom of it first, investigate it, figure out what they did, and hold them accountable.

You seem to really not give a damn about that part

Somehow, this is in Trump's lap?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ProgN said:

Quote:

DOT funding to the program which was established to meet a Biden order meant to 'advance equitable outcomes.'



equitable outcomes. that's communism.
NormanEH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wait until you guys hear what DoD spent on DEI suppliers
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tanya 93 said:

Urban Ag said:

Tanya 93 said:

Urban Ag said:

Democrats are just not serious people.

That is the peril we face. In a very dangerous world nearly half of our country votes for non serious people.

The white liberal is the most destructive force on Earth.


No

That would be Satanists

Tanya I don't really care what you call them. Democrat voters are insane. And look who is leading their party now.

Crocket, AOC, Omar, Tlaib? Their men are simps. Their old guard is quitting and/or dying off. The commie/muslim is going to be the next mayor of NYC.

The dem party, if successful, is the death of the west.


Hopefully a new party develops.
One with common sense and doesn't focus on religion

A party or leader that doesn't have God at the center, is always doomed to fail
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NormanEH said:

Wait until you guys hear what DoD spent on DEI suppliers


Let's hear it
jejdag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

ts5641 said:

Do you understand the evil you need to spend $80 billion of the citizen's money for DEI? $80 ****ing billion!


The Dems like wasting $80 billion here and $80 billion there (Afghanistan).


Then ***** and raise hell about cutting $9 billion out of the budget!
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

Tanya 93 said:

Urban Ag said:

Democrats are just not serious people.

That is the peril we face. In a very dangerous world nearly half of our country votes for non serious people.

The white liberal is the most destructive force on Earth.


No

That would be Satanists

Tanya I don't really care what you call them. Democrat voters are insane. And look who is leading their party now.

Crocket, AOC, Omar, Tlaib? Their men are simps. Their old guard is quitting and/or dying off. The commie/muslim is going to be the next mayor of NYC.

The dem party, if successful, is the death of the west.


And Minnesota. We're playing a dangerous game right now. This is exactly why they're pushing back so hard against these deportations. Every one means that they lose a pawn who will vote for this radical nonsense.
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll just leave this here..

Buttigieg says America's highways are racist and infrastructure bill will help fix it | The Independent
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tanya 93 said:

Urban Ag said:

Tanya 93 said:

Urban Ag said:

Democrats are just not serious people.

That is the peril we face. In a very dangerous world nearly half of our country votes for non serious people.

The white liberal is the most destructive force on Earth.


No

That would be Satanists

Tanya I don't really care what you call them. Democrat voters are insane. And look who is leading their party now.

Crocket, AOC, Omar, Tlaib? Their men are simps. Their old guard is quitting and/or dying off. The commie/muslim is going to be the next mayor of NYC.

The dem party, if successful, is the death of the west.


Hopefully a new party develops.
One with common sense and doesn't focus on religion


I don't want a party that doesn't focus on God & Chrstianity......definitely not in the United States. "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic or which it stands. One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

If one is formed, I certainly won't be voting for anyone who is a part of it. The liberals these days are making an absolute mockery of the "under God" and "indivisible" parts of our pledge.
Cobra39
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The leaders of our military sat in front of Congress plenty of times and said that DEI was the #1 priority.

Cobra39
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's all about funneling spending to groups snd categories of person most likely to be Democrat voters, supports, and activists, so some of that that money can be redirected or laundered into political support for Dem politicians and causes. They want to spend public money to achieve a perpetual one party state.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

It's all about funneling spending to groups snd categories of person most likely to be Democrat voters, supports, and activists, so some of that that money can be redirected or laundered into political support for Dem politicians and causes. They want to spend public money to achieve a perpetual one party state.

Iirc, the CFPB that Pocahontas insisted on after the financial collapse was set up exactly for this purpose. The fines/settlements that corporations could pay to avoid further litigation was passed through to progressive groups. It was essentially extortion of the private sector to further the progressive agenda.
jejdag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David_Puddy said:

Tanya 93 said:

Urban Ag said:

Tanya 93 said:

Urban Ag said:

Democrats are just not serious people.

That is the peril we face. In a very dangerous world nearly half of our country votes for non serious people.

The white liberal is the most destructive force on Earth.


No

That would be Satanists

Tanya I don't really care what you call them. Democrat voters are insane. And look who is leading their party now.

Crocket, AOC, Omar, Tlaib? Their men are simps. Their old guard is quitting and/or dying off. The commie/muslim is going to be the next mayor of NYC.

The dem party, if successful, is the death of the west.


Hopefully a new party develops.
One with common sense and doesn't focus on religion


I don't want a party that doesn't focus on God & Chrstianity......definitely not in the United States. "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic or which it stands. One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

If one is formed, I certainly won't be voting for anyone who is a part of it. The liberals these days are making an absolute mockery of the "under God" and "indivisible" parts of our pledge.


There is no comma after 'Under God' in The Pledge of Allegiance
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

There is no comma after 'Under God' in The Pledge of Allegiance

Close!



(There is no comma before "under God")

I'm Gipper
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobra39 said:

The leaders of our military sat in front of Congress plenty of times and said that DEI was the #1 priority.

Cobra39


Climate change was up there too.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do not care about commas in the pledge

Still think he is hot. Quite attractive actually
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tanya 93 said:

Do not care about commas in the pledge

Still think he is hot. Quite attractive actually



this guy?

jejdag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

There is no comma after 'Under God' in The Pledge of Allegiance

Close!



(There is no comma before "under God")

Sonnuva! I am properly embarrassed.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for pointing that out….doesnt change anything
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.