Less is more- DOJ version

1,753 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by ts5641
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
69 DOJ attorneys in the Federal Programs Branch, the unit which specializes in defending Administration policies have quit since the inauguration. Good riddance.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/sixty-nine-doj-lawyers-defending-trump-administration-policies-court

Obviously, since the libs have mounted an all out lawfare campaign against the admin, this adds stress to the ability to counter and win in the courts.

But my thought is I'd rather have an overworked attorney defending the Constitution than a fresh half hearted swamp wannabe. Clear out the dead wood who have been positioning themselves to be hired by a NY firm specializing in advancing dem policies and replace them with some young firebreathers who understand this is not the time to *****foot around. Ask the Federalist Society to send litigators to apply.

This is a generational opportunity to take back some ground and the status quo hired guns who were okay with the Biden Admin's assault on the Constitution have no place defending Trump policies.
MD1993
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How normal is that in an admin change? I would think most of the attorneys defend a policy would feel they need to be aligned with it in in a government capacity. I get it an attorney can defend anything, but that seems different when on your own in the public sector and getting lots of money, vs government attorneys seem more idealistic.

So good riddance, swamp rat attorneys.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obligatory: It's a Good Start.
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Obligatory: It's a Good Start.


Wait, are they now at the bottom of the sea??
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

69 DOJ attorneys

lol...69
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrEvazanPhD said:

aggiehawg said:

Obligatory: It's a Good Start.


Wait, are they now at the bottom of the sea??

Who cares? They are off of the federal payroll.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Martin Q. Blank said:

Quote:

69 DOJ attorneys

lol...69

Next goal...420...
Independence H-D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

Martin Q. Blank said:

Quote:

69 DOJ attorneys

lol...69

Next goal...420...


That's a pretty high number....
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Independence H-D said:

Ag with kids said:

Martin Q. Blank said:

Quote:

69 DOJ attorneys

lol...69

Next goal...420...


That's a pretty high number....

Wait...wut???
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog73 said:

overworked attorney

Not sure those exist in the federal government.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
one safe place said:

Bulldog73 said:

overworked attorney

Not sure those exist in the federal government.

Any attorneys who were from the last administration probably need to go.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.