FlyRod said:
A thing called Vigilante Fox, with no credibility, verification, or anything identifying what it is just posted a thing! If this isn't cause for unhinged outrage…what is?
It is hard to know where to start with this complete idiocy. I'll go line by line to make it easy for you to keep up (hopefully):
1. What is your authority for "no credibility?" You?
2. No verification? Seriously? He's playing videos. I realize in the age of AI that means less than it did a decade or more ago, but if they were that good at manipulating video, why would they do JUST this? In other words, why not try for something bigger and better?
3. Not "anything identifying what it is?" Are you referring to the content or themselves? If the former, that's just incorrect. If the latter, what is your point? Unless you think the videos are manipulated -- if so, make that point -- it speaks for itself.
4. Your flip remark based on your idiotic comments is a reflection of YOU, not what you're referencing. Its sad you don't see that.
Perhaps you're either trolling or, like Rush used to do, illustrating absurdity by being absurd. If that's the case, congratulations. You got me. If not, you have no business commenting on public policy.
