And that is the prevailing liberal belief about crime and criminals - the situation led them to do what they did - leading to disastrous criminal justice reform that considers treatment and reintegration, and thus worldly salvation, more important than public safety.Gandalf the Maroon said:
Poor kid, what he did was awful, but I still feel bad for anyone who is in a situation that leads them to do what he did. May God have mercy on him. And I hate that tweet, nobody is beyond salvation.
I worked with juvenile murderers, rapists, and child molesters. The chaos and violence in their lives was disturbing and heartrending. However, at some point they would admit excitement at the thought of their wicked intentions prior to committing the act - the motivation of which was entirely independent of the severe traumatizing abuse and neglect they experienced.
Psychologist Rob Henderson shared in his recent book Troubled about shuffling through the foster care system and the "situations," as it were, leading to his own antisocial behavior; however, he writes
It is a question of the origin of good and evil.Quote:
I was well aware that dysfunction and deprivation are enormous obstacles to success. On the other hand, I believed that even under such conditions, people still retained agency. People have choices; we're not billiard balls traveling along preordained trajectories with no say in the matter. . . . [It] is a choice you are making.
Liberals disavow that there are people who revel in cruelty and violence.
If we can just give them an education, and a home, and a job, and healthcare, and whatever else they seemingly lack, they will change their ways (note: they never discuss stable family as a solution, it is always economic).
I guess they never actually spoke to someone who admitted that that kind of life is boring and they like the excitement, and power, of pointing a gun at someone, threatening them, and telling them what to do.