Ag_07 said:

---

I know it goes against the Dems TDS and their propensity to push back on anything implemented by Trump but if Gavin was serious about a presidential run he could've used this to catapult himself.

He could've come out and pushed back on the ICE raids but also spoke out vehemently against the violent protests. He could've stood up and said 'Look we don't agree with these raids but we also don't condemn violence and we're working directly with the POTUS to protect the citizens and property of CA and the US'.

Then afterwards he could've propped himself up for being able to work with Republicans to rid CA of the violence and work for the citizens.

Dems misplayed their hand and missed a huge opportunity.

---

It's baffling how Gavin's TDS, as well as that of other Democrats, overrides any logic with regard to governance, right, wrong, and the rule of law.

They cannot resist the opportunity to oppose Trump. They HAVE to do it, no matter how nonsensical their opposition is. Gavin is literally willing to let Los Angeles burn to the ground, as long as he can score a temporary legal victory in a friendly courtroom.

As you so aptly stated, this is just another opportunity where Democrats could have signaled a return to reasonableness, as well as a desire to protect citizens who follow the law. But alas, pandering to noncitizens, criminals, activists, and the extreme far left seems to them to be the appropriate play.

At least they continue to show us who they really are...

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

It is all about furthering their marxist destruction of the nation.

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

What's the purpose of them being there?


This is borderline "I'm not hitting you" behavior that 3rd graders do.

ETFan said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

What's the purpose of them being there?


This is borderline "I'm not hitting you" behavior that 3rd graders do.

---

To protect a city that Democrats won't. Wouldn't be the first time they've abdicated responsiblity in favor of illegals.
Next time don't vote for a President that allows 20 million illegals into the country.
YOU are the one to blame.

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

That's not happening YET.

Newsome abdicates his responsiblity
Democrats continue to loot and burn
Democrats continue to attack LEOs and ICE
Marines are in.
Democrats attack marines. Marines defend themselves.

OMG Trumps marines are killing americans. And i can already tell you which posters on here will parrot that stupid narrative.

ETFan said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

What's the purpose of them being there?


This is borderline "I'm not hitting you" behavior that 3rd graders do.

---

I laid it out on page 2. Typical liberal fashion, deny facts and continue to lie to further your narrative.

ETFan said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

What's the purpose of them being there?


This is borderline "I'm not hitting you" behavior that 3rd graders do.

---

Agree with this poster.

Let them burn LA - and every liberal city - to the ground!

Logos Stick said:

---

ETFan said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

What's the purpose of them being there?


This is borderline "I'm not hitting you" behavior that 3rd graders do.

---

Agree with this poster.

Let them burn LA - and every liberal city - to the ground!

---

Mother Nature already did that once.
This might come as a major shock you, but the Democrats learnt nothing.

Quote:

---

It's baffling how Gavin's TDS, as well as that of other Democrats, overrides any logic with regard to governance, right, wrong, and the rule of law.

---

Not as baffling as the voters who keep putting them into office even as they struggle to deal with the consequences of their poor choices.

deddog said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

ETFan said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.


Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

---

What's the purpose of them being there?


This is borderline "I'm not hitting you" behavior that 3rd graders do.

---

Agree with this poster.

Let them burn LA - and every liberal city - to the ground!

---

Mother Nature already did that once.
This might come as a major shock you, but the Democrats learnt nothing.

---

Don't disagree. At this point, I just want to see major pain inflicted. These dumbasses are trying to destroy the country and need to be punched in the mouth. Crapping in their own bed is just the ticket!

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

I think most of the founding fathers like Thomas Jefferson, etc. would've told you but that's impossible as there is no existing mechanism to even do something like that

He would tell you that's called a civil war.

---

Did I miss something? Where was it said that Trump was sending the Marines in to fight US citizens?

I thought they were deployed to protect federal assets. In other words, they're not gonna engage unless engaged by rioters.

You've posted a couple of times that Trump sending in the Marines (to protect Federal buildings) was analagous to sending troops to collect firearms door to door.

I think you may be a tad bit confused.

Outright spewing lies.

Ulysses90 said:

---

AgGrad99 said:

---

'We completely disagree with this request, but we respect a State's right to choose it's own governance. If they choose to let criminals from other countries destroy their cities, then we will honor their wish. We remain ready to help if it's requested'

That should be the message. 'It's sad, it's terrible, but if it's what you want...'

---

The President has the responsibility and the authority under Article Ii to enforce federal laws, protect federal property, and protect the constitutional rights of all citizens regardless or not whether they are citizens that have voted themselves a horrible Marxist state government. Article II responsibility ends when that land is no longer one of the United States.

---

Fair enough.

I'd just like to see them burn, and assume all the blame at the same time.

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

I think most of the founding fathers like Thomas Jefferson, etc. would've told you but that's impossible as there is no existing mechanism to even do something like that

He would tell you that's called a civil war.

---

Have you really forgotten that much of American history? Our founding fathers did exactly that - including your boy Thomas Jefferson.

I'm too lazy to type it up and stealing this from Wiki, but at least I remember our history.

Quote:

---

17861787: Shays' Rebellion: a Western Massachusetts debtor's revolt over a credit squeeze that had financially devastated many farmers. The federal government was fiscally unable to raise an army to assist the state militia in combating the uprising; the weakness of the national government bolstered the arguments in favor of replacing the Articles of Confederation with an updated governmental framework.

17911794: Whiskey Rebellion: a series of protests against the institution of a federal tax on the distillation of spirits as a revenue source for repaying the nation's war bonds. The revolt was centered upon southwestern Pennsylvania, although violence occurred throughout the Trans-Appalachian region.

17991800: Fries's Rebellion: a string of protests against the enactment of new real estate taxes to pay for the Quasi-War. Hostilities were concentrated in the communities of the Pennsylvania Dutch.

---

deddog said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

deddog said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

ProgN said:

---

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/trump-marines-newsom-lawsuit-california.html

Quote:

---

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday asked a federal judge to quickly block the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard members and Marines to Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids.

State Attorney General Rob Bonta asked the judge to grant a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump's actions by 1 p.m. PT in order to "prevent immediate and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs."

Without that fast relief, Trump's deployment of the military and the National Guard poses "imminent harm to State Sovereignty, deprives the State of vital resources, escalates tensions and promotes (rather than quells) civil unrest," Bonta told Judge Charles Breyer in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

That seems pretty basic.

That is Civil War level starting **** right there.

Can you imagine if a president passed an executive order against guns (as a health crisis) and so the ****ing military into Texas to put down protest and confiscate weapons.

I don't want this door opened

---

What if the State Goevrnment abdicates its responsiblity and lets its party members burn , loot and murder.
What then?

---

I imagine that gets worked out itself. You don't send the Marines.

Sometimes you gotta let this **** play out and the full weight of those decisions playing out in full will resolve itself?

---

Wait. So we let people die? Thats how you let it work out?
You let folks loot, burn and murder, and hope it works its way out??

Commies have taken over countries in this way. And they will do the same here.

---

The time has passed for passive treatment in response to people like Gavin Newsome, Karen Bass, or Mad Maxine who's attempts at narrative building actively puts citizens, federal employees, public and private property at extreme risk just to try to gain a political upper hand.

Law abiding citizens are tired of letting the crazies run free in the streets burning, looting and creating mayhem.

Couple that with the likelihood that much of this is organized and funded by opposition NGO's, I 100% support Trump being proactive.

We tried doing it the "nice" way last time. We got Minneapolis, Portland, and Seattle hit with millions in damages, and multiple cases of loss of life. No more.

ETFan said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

---

Thats not happening so you can stop lying.

---

What's the purpose of them being there?
To protect Federal assets. It's been stated multiple times. Pay attention.... like 3rd graders do.

This is borderline "I'm not hitting you" behavior that 3rd graders do.

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Ag_07 said:

---

I know it goes against the Dems TDS and their propensity to push back on anything implemented by Trump but if Gavin was serious about a presidential run he could've used this to catapult himself.

He could've come out and pushed back on the ICE raids but also spoke out vehemently against the violent protests. He could've stood up and said 'Look we don't agree with these raids but we also don't condemn violence and we're working directly with the POTUS to protect the citizens and property of CA and the US'.

Then afterwards he could've propped himself up for being able to work with Republicans to rid CA of the violence and work for the citizens.

Dems misplayed their hand and missed a huge opportunity.

---

It's baffling how Gavin's TDS, as well as that of other Democrats, overrides any logic with regard to governance, right, wrong, and the rule of law.

They cannot resist the opportunity to oppose Trump. They HAVE to do it, no matter how nonsensical their opposition is. Gavin is literally willing to let Los Angeles burn to the ground, as long as he can score a temporary legal victory in a friendly courtroom.

As you so aptly stated, this is just another opportunity where Democrats could have signaled a return to reasonableness, as well as a desire to protect citizens who follow the law. But alas, pandering to noncitizens, criminals, activists, and the extreme far left seems to them to be the appropriate play.

At least they continue to show us who they really are...

---

FWIW, I don't think its TDS. Its just poor political instincts. Or maybe he's resigned to the fact that he ain't gonna win Presidency , maybe he's thinking about a Senator run. So he's "defending" California from evil Trump.

BREAKING: A federal judge has just BLOCKED Gavin Newsoms attempt to revoke the federalization of the National Guard!

This is a HUGE BLOW to the government in California that wants to allow the invasion to continue.

WINNING!!! pic.twitter.com/XHzbEdeyO4

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) June 10, 2025

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

I think most of the founding fathers like Thomas Jefferson, etc. would've told you but that's impossible as there is no existing mechanism to even do something like that

He would tell you that's called a civil war.

---

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shays%27s_Rebellion

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_War

https://www.history.com/articles/little-rock-nine-brown-v-board-eisenhower-101-airborne

What's a good alternative to protecting federal buildings against those animals? There is none! "Mostly peaceful protests."

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

I think most of the founding fathers like Thomas Jefferson, etc. would've told you but that's impossible as there is no existing mechanism to even do something like that

He would tell you that's called a civil war.

---

Now do Thomas Jefferson's opinion on judges…

CrackerJackAg said:

---

ProgN said:

---

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/trump-marines-newsom-lawsuit-california.html

Quote:

---

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday asked a federal judge to quickly block the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard members and Marines to Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids.

State Attorney General Rob Bonta asked the judge to grant a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump's actions by 1 p.m. PT in order to "prevent immediate and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs."

Without that fast relief, Trump's deployment of the military and the National Guard poses "imminent harm to State Sovereignty, deprives the State of vital resources, escalates tensions and promotes (rather than quells) civil unrest," Bonta told Judge Charles Breyer in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

That seems pretty basic.

That is Civil War level starting **** right there.

Can you imagine if a president passed an executive order against guns (as a health crisis) and so the ****ing military into Texas to put down protest and confiscate weapons.

I don't want this door opened

---

This isn't an "Executive Order Against Guns" level of things...this is well within his given powers and, more specifically, duties.

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

---

And that isn't how this nation was founded.

If California would have prevented ICE agents from being attacked, none of this would have happened, but they wanted it to happen. Leftists always demand it being their way, and will break any law and commit any violence in acts of defiance.

---

So you really think that when this country was founded everyone figured it would be standard operating procedures to send Marines in to fight US citizens in particular states.

I think most of the founding fathers like Thomas Jefferson, etc. would've told you but that's impossible as there is no existing mechanism to even do something like that

He would tell you that's called a civil war.

---

Your sense of the minds of historical figures without actually reading history is precious. Thomas Jefferson was President when the Insurrection Act of 1807 was passed. It is his signature that made it federal law. This law:

Quote:

---

"Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion."

---

Thomas Jefferson is the guy that sent a detachment of Marines overseas for the first time to protect US interests by imposing regime change on the Bashaw of Teipoli. You should read more about what our founding fathers actually wrote and did before ascribing modern notions of liberal ideals to them.

Ag with kids said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

ProgN said:

---

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/trump-marines-newsom-lawsuit-california.html

Quote:

---

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday asked a federal judge to quickly block the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard members and Marines to Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids.

State Attorney General Rob Bonta asked the judge to grant a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump's actions by 1 p.m. PT in order to "prevent immediate and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs."

Without that fast relief, Trump's deployment of the military and the National Guard poses "imminent harm to State Sovereignty, deprives the State of vital resources, escalates tensions and promotes (rather than quells) civil unrest," Bonta told Judge Charles Breyer in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

That seems pretty basic.

That is Civil War level starting **** right there.

Can you imagine if a president passed an executive order against guns (as a health crisis) and so the ****ing military into Texas to put down protest and confiscate weapons.

I don't want this door opened

---

Cool.

So when schools were ordered to be integrated, you'd have supported the southern governors preventing it and not had the NG ensure that the black kids were allowed in.

Noted...

---

Not everything is slavery, not everything is the Holocaust and not everything is the civil rights movement.

Extremes exist.

Obviously.

strbrst777 said:

---

What's a good alternative to protecting federal buildings against those animals? There is none! "Mostly peaceful protests."

---

Batmobile armor.

I am pretty sure evicting unvetted millions of gang bangers, bad actors and terrorists counts more than black kids and white kids being taught in the same classroom in the 1960s.

Hell, now Dems support black kids being segregated for white kids and protected from white privilege and sentenced to a life of entitlement funds as long as the vote D.

This is exactly the moment you send in the national guard. In fact, I will absolutely criticize Trump for being too distracted from COVID and too focused on a 2nd term - resulting in him being too accommodating during BLM.

He is getting it right this time.

flown-the-coop said:

---

I am pretty sure evicting unvetted millions of gang bangers, bad actors and terrorists counts more than black kids and white kids being taught in the same classroom in the 1960s.

Hell, now Dems support black kids being segregated for white kids and protected from white privilege and sentenced to a life of entitlement funds as long as the vote D.

This is exactly the moment you send in the national guard. In fact, I will absolutely criticize Trump for being too distracted from COVID and too focused on a 2nd term - resulting in him being too accommodating during BLM.

He is getting it right this time.

---

Thankfully it's a second term. He DGAF.

Can you read? There's no mystery here.

ICE has been deporting the criminals Biden intentionally let into America. Terrorists in CA attacked ICE to stop them. Newsom and Bass cheered on the attackers and refused to protect federal officers. Here we are.

Zombie Jon Snow said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

I am pretty sure evicting unvetted millions of gang bangers, bad actors and terrorists counts more than black kids and white kids being taught in the same classroom in the 1960s.

Hell, now Dems support black kids being segregated for white kids and protected from white privilege and sentenced to a life of entitlement funds as long as the vote D.

This is exactly the moment you send in the national guard. In fact, I will absolutely criticize Trump for being too distracted from COVID and too focused on a 2nd term - resulting in him being too accommodating during BLM.

He is getting it right this time.

---

Thankfully it's a second term. He DGAF.

---

Wait until after the midterms. Then we get real DGAF Trump. I am already buying popcorn and butter.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/06/10/federal-judge-denies-newsoms-lawsuit-ordering-trump-to-withdraw-national-guard/

Quote:

---

A federal judge denied Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom's request to quash President Donald Trump's deployment of California's National Guard troops to riot zones in Los Angeles.

Judge Charles Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton, denied Newsom's emergency request for a Temporary Restraining Order regarding Trump deploying4,000 National Guardsmen to Los Angeles.

---

Approval Of Trump's national guard deployment

🟢 Yes: 59% (+20)
🔴 No: 39%

Insider advantage (Rating: A) | June 10 pic.twitter.com/51lGrtDmtT

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) June 10, 2025

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

ProgN said:

---

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/trump-marines-newsom-lawsuit-california.html

Quote:

---

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday asked a federal judge to quickly block the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard members and Marines to Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids.

State Attorney General Rob Bonta asked the judge to grant a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump's actions by 1 p.m. PT in order to "prevent immediate and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs."

Without that fast relief, Trump's deployment of the military and the National Guard poses "imminent harm to State Sovereignty, deprives the State of vital resources, escalates tensions and promotes (rather than quells) civil unrest," Bonta told Judge Charles Breyer in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

That seems pretty basic.

That is Civil War level starting **** right there.

Can you imagine if a president passed an executive order against guns (as a health crisis) and so the ****ing military into Texas to put down protest and confiscate weapons.

I don't want this door opened

---

Cool.

So when schools were ordered to be integrated, you'd have supported the southern governors preventing it and not had the NG ensure that the black kids were allowed in.

Noted...

---

Not everything is slavery, not everything is the Holocaust and not everything is the civil rights movement.

Extremes exist.

Obviously.

---

This is the people you support, notice his jewelry, the gang tats. That's a criminal, not an upstanding member of society.

usmcbrooks said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

CrackerJackAg said:

---

ProgN said:

---

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/trump-marines-newsom-lawsuit-california.html

Quote:

---

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday asked a federal judge to quickly block the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard members and Marines to Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids.

State Attorney General Rob Bonta asked the judge to grant a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump's actions by 1 p.m. PT in order to "prevent immediate and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs."

Without that fast relief, Trump's deployment of the military and the National Guard poses "imminent harm to State Sovereignty, deprives the State of vital resources, escalates tensions and promotes (rather than quells) civil unrest," Bonta told Judge Charles Breyer in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

---

I hope the city burns completely if a judge is this ******ed.

---

Ultimately, I believe that a state should be able to tell the feds to stay out. Especially militarily.

That seems pretty basic.

That is Civil War level starting **** right there.

Can you imagine if a president passed an executive order against guns (as a health crisis) and so the ****ing military into Texas to put down protest and confiscate weapons.

I don't want this door opened

---

Cool.

So when schools were ordered to be integrated, you'd have supported the southern governors preventing it and not had the NG ensure that the black kids were allowed in.

Noted...

---

Not everything is slavery, not everything is the Holocaust and not everything is the civil rights movement.

Extremes exist.

Obviously.

---

This is the people you support, notice his jewelry, the gang tats. That's a criminal, not an upstanding member of society.

---

How do you get I approve of that animal?

I'm just not a fan of deploying the national guard against a states wishes except under the most extreme of situations.

I would think you can probably process that.

I'm just not blinded by the current situation and willing to toss the larger issue aside.