Quote:
This is a TA phenomenon that I've also observed. Somebody finds a meaningful topic to post about and spends minutes to hours quoting, editing, linking, and typing out a relevant message to go along with the rest of it - and they might not even get a star. The first couple of posters with a snarky comment will go blue in less time than it took to post the OP. That's why I make it a point to star an OP that I've posted a response to and even star a post that I found worthy of quoting in agreement.
I don't get it either.
Thank you. I couldn't have said it better. This is one of the reasons I quit last summer but didn't want to mention it. It's also a reason I don't post many OPs here. I find it to be a waste of time if all your efforts are unrewarded.
As much as I enjoy being a part of Forum 16 and the Aggie family, there seems to be an element where posters either neglect to blue star a post that they like, or they just don't do it as a practice, or they think someone's post doesn't deserve credit. It's not like blue stars are in someone's account. They're free to give away, no charge. And I'm not talking about myself, I see it all the time here. If you like someone's comment or meme, give 'em credit with a blue star. Is that too much to ask for?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.