couldnt be worse than your trolling

BTKAG97 said:

---

The multiple conflicts of interest Boasberg has with the cases he is presiding over is alarming.

---

Like? The guy is no leftist. He ruled in favor to have Clinton's emails reviewed and kept Trumps IRS returns from being made public.
People sure cherry pick only the 'bad rulings'. We sure championed those judges that stopped some of the things Biden was doing. We can't have it both ways. People need to get a grip. Otherwise we're going to see the next Dem president going after 'conservative' judges to impeach. Impeachment of judges is for unethical and illegal behavior....not because their decisions didn't go in someones favor. And even if they did, that's what the appeals process is for.

The victimhood people are exuding is getting nuts. Champion the things Trump is doing right and don't be afraid to criticize things that he shouldn't be doing.

We've read the excuses. Yes, he's a leftist. No, he doesn't respect the Constitution.

BluHorseShu said:

---

BTKAG97 said:

---

The multiple conflicts of interest Boasberg has with the cases he is presiding over is alarming.

---

Like? The guy is no leftist. He ruled in favor to have Clinton's emails reviewed and kept Trumps IRS returns from being made public.
People sure cherry pick only the 'bad rulings'. We sure championed those judges that stopped some of the things Biden was doing. We can't have it both ways. People need to get a grip. Otherwise we're going to see the next Dem president going after 'conservative' judges to impeach. Impeachment of judges is for unethical and illegal behavior....not because their decisions didn't go in someones favor. And even if they did, that's what the appeals process is for.

The victimhood people are exuding is getting nuts. Champion the things Trump is doing right and don't be afraid to criticize things that he shouldn't be doing.

---

Both his wife and daughter (plus other relatives) are strongly affiliated with immigration organizations whos actions are suspect at best regarding illegals.

So many of these leftist judges are terribly conflicted. Yet, I don't recall Trump or his DOJ ever filing a Motion for a judge to recuse themselves. At the least, it would be terrible publicity for the court and the judiciary. Plus it would give something additional to argue on appeal. I mean the b*stards are going to rule against you anyway. At least let the public know how dirty they are.

Aquin said:

---

So many of these leftist judges are terribly conflicted. Yet, I don't recall Trump or his DOJ ever filing a Motion for a judge to recuse themselves.

---

They have filed multiple such motions!

This food thread has been amazing

you must have not seen that poor example of ceviche

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

We've read the excuses. Yes, he's a leftist. No, he doesn't respect the Constitution.

---

Only because he didn't temporarily decide in Trumps favor? Its just getting old now. Every awesome conservative judge is now only one decision a way from being 'he was a leftist who doesn't respect the constitution'.

Suddenly everyone is a constitutional scholar....who fail to realize that there still is a process even if you 'think' they didn't follow the constitution in their decision. You do not impeach judges for decision you disagree with. You appeal them.
People have lost faith in the government, faith in congress is still not great and if people lose faith in the judiciary then there are no longer any checks and balances.

Quote:

---

People have lost faith in the government, faith in congress is still not great and if people lose faith in the judiciary then there are no longer any checks and balances.

---

Judges issuing orders where they have no jurisdiction is a great way to make citizens mistrust the judiciary.

CDUB98 said:

---

GreasenUSA said:

---

I like the OP.

He's a huge Trump fan. Always has been.

---

He's a leftist troll who, under several usernames over the years, spams the board with over the top stuff.

Manny was his original name.

---

What proof do you have that this is true? This type of accusation is common behavior, as the mods have pointed out.

BluHorseShu said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

We've read the excuses. Yes, he's a leftist. No, he doesn't respect the Constitution.

---

Only because he didn't temporarily decide in Trumps favor?

---

No, because it's none of his business. Judge Boasberg is not the Executive Branch, and the Executive does not work for him and never has. Boasberg is way out of line, and is merely obstructing like a good leftist.

A sock defending his other sock is peak texags. So glad I didn't miss it. This is almost as good when the lib sock outed himself.

Almost as good as the Rolando & Redstone bit

You must be new here.

You referring to the 2 posters responding in detail to the analysis of the other, that were obviously different because each had an Ag Tag?

ore rolling

passing would be a blessing for you know

thats what u r doing right now

wait op is Manny? ah makes sense, wasnt his old username Danny White

danny white?

must know more