Yes, there is the possibility the copilot was a DEI hire. There is a possibility that posters on this site are alcoholics, drug addicts, wife beaters, pedophiles, etc.
That doesn't mean I assume the worst out of everyone
I am not, either. Nor are most of us. It's why you shouldn't be offended by us having the conversation. You are digging in your heels when there is no reason to do so. Not a single person has criticized your daughter.CanyonAg77 said:
Possibility
Yes, there is the possibility the copilot was a DEI hire. There is a possibility that posters on this site are alcoholics, drug addicts, wife beaters, pedophiles, etc.
That doesn't mean I assume the worst out of everyone
Quote:
None of us knows a lot beyond that.
CanyonAg77 said:Quote:
None of us knows a lot beyond that.
Hasn't stopped the accusations and assumptions.
Our flight deck should reflect the diverse group of people on board our planes every day. That’s why we plan for 50% of the 5,000 pilots we train in the next decade to be women or people of color. Learn more and apply now: https://t.co/VbOFvFOksB pic.twitter.com/r0ScH6MQAJ
— United Airlines (@united) April 6, 2021
aTmAg said:Are standards lower for gay dudes? If so, then yes I would want my pilot to be straight.sts7049 said:i'm not really debating those people. i agree with them, i want the best most qualified pilots as well.Ellis Wyatt said:Almost everyone has said they do not care who is flying as long as they are actually qualified to do so. That doesn't seem racist or sexist to me, but hey, I just care more about arriving somewhere safely than I do about feeling good because of who is at the controls. Sadly, one has to wonder these days because of open racism and sexism in hiring practices.sts7049 said:
you can stick with whatever backward logic makes you happy!
i still want to know if you guys care if these white men are gay or not.
i'm specifically asking the one who said he only wants a white male.
Is this supposed to be some sort of gotcha question?
Philip J Fry said:
And that's why DEI is sinister and unfair to women and minorities. Everyone will assume they are incompetent and just hired for diversity reasons instead of on merit. Shockingly, being racist hurts everyone
and after adding an upside-down landing to her resume...Loren Visser said:Especially given the fact that she was a less experienced pilot. That indicates a recent hire when DEI were solidly entrenched in the selection of pilots and many other crucially important aviation roles.aTmAg said:
The facts be damned? It is a fact that DEI lowered standards for women. It is therefore likely that this pilot was of lower standards than her straight white/Asian male counterparts. It's math.
That is all fact.
Show me the evidence that she was competent.
We are not the ones drawing the arbitrary boundaries. But someone did. And then lowered standards for some people. That is the whole point.Quote:
not at all. if we're drawing arbitrary boundaries on who is acceptable, I would have thought being gay should also have been excluded too since they are one of these protected classes with DEI. I'm just wondering how narrow this distinction is supposed to be.
sts7049 said:
sure. if you actually know for sure DEI is why they were hired.
and once again the circle of debate continues on this thread. I don't really have any more to say on this here as this is really going nowhere. yall enjoy the outrage
Sea Speed said:
It's perfectly reasonable to wonder if this was a result of their dei hiring practices for at least these two reasons:
1. They proudly hire for dei reasons.
2. The end result.
Of course we don't know with certainty that this is why, but due to the above, it is perfectly reasonable to view this incident through the self inflicted lens of dei hiring practices. This is not an unreasonable or illogical assumption to make.
If it doesn't even cross your mind that this could have been a DEI hire, you're ignorant.sts7049 said:Sea Speed said:
It's perfectly reasonable to wonder if this was a result of their dei hiring practices for at least these two reasons:
1. They proudly hire for dei reasons.
2. The end result.
Of course we don't know with certainty that this is why, but due to the above, it is perfectly reasonable to view this incident through the self inflicted lens of dei hiring practices. This is not an unreasonable or illogical assumption to make.
redcrayon said:
Remember this from United?Our flight deck should reflect the diverse group of people on board our planes every day. That’s why we plan for 50% of the 5,000 pilots we train in the next decade to be women or people of color. Learn more and apply now: https://t.co/VbOFvFOksB pic.twitter.com/r0ScH6MQAJ
— United Airlines (@united) April 6, 2021
This stuff is now embedded in our national psyche. You can't blame people for questioning the qualifications of pilots when we were blatantly told they would be hiring based on gender and race. It sucks for the highly qualified and competent female and minority pilots but here we are.
Tom Fox said:redcrayon said:
Remember this from United?Our flight deck should reflect the diverse group of people on board our planes every day. That’s why we plan for 50% of the 5,000 pilots we train in the next decade to be women or people of color. Learn more and apply now: https://t.co/VbOFvFOksB pic.twitter.com/r0ScH6MQAJ
— United Airlines (@united) April 6, 2021
This stuff is now embedded in our national psyche. You can't blame people for questioning the qualifications of pilots when we were blatantly told they would be hiring based on gender and race. It sucks for the highly qualified and competent female and minority pilots but here we are.
Now we only need to know if white males make up more than 50% of their applicant. Then the circumstantial evidence would end strong and grow stronger as the percentage of white male applicants increased.
I cannot believe these idiots have not experienced DEI in their personal lives. Fed LE wanted 50% of their agents to be minorities or women even though white males made up the majority of applicants. It was obvious that they were inferior and graduated at the bottom of the class at FLETC.
Fast forward to law school. Minorities were given a huge bump on their test scores. Then they graduated at the bottom of our class.
The same phenomenon is happening across many previously white male dominated professions. I've heard the same from med school applicants.
Because we KNOW the standards have been lowered for some people. We just don't know who. The ones crashing aircraft are good people to suspect. It's a logical starting point.CanyonAg77 said:Quote:
None of us knows a lot beyond that.
Hasn't stopped the accusations and assumptions.
CanyonAg77 said:
I've often said that the real poison of DEI is that competent women and minorities will always have a question mark on their record.
Ellis Wyatt said:Because we KNOW the standards have been lowered for some people. We just don't know who. The ones crashing aircraft are good people to suspect. It's a logical starting point.CanyonAg77 said:Quote:
None of us knows a lot beyond that.
Hasn't stopped the accusations and assumptions.
You're asking these cultish ze/zirs to question their faith. It is heresy to question or criticize DEI in any way. Getting them to acknowledge things like (i) Maybe a merit based system is both more fair, moral and effective than hiring and promoting and discriminating based on physical characteristics or (b) maybe gay pre-teen cartoon porn like "Gender Queer" doesn't really belong in elementary school libraries...would be like a Christian openly saying maybe Christ didn't rise on day 3.redcrayon said:If it doesn't even cross your mind that this could have been a DEI hire, you're ignorant.sts7049 said:Sea Speed said:
It's perfectly reasonable to wonder if this was a result of their dei hiring practices for at least these two reasons:
1. They proudly hire for dei reasons.
2. The end result.
Of course we don't know with certainty that this is why, but due to the above, it is perfectly reasonable to view this incident through the self inflicted lens of dei hiring practices. This is not an unreasonable or illogical assumption to make.
Stat Monitor Repairman said:
Why are airline pilots the only profession on this list where DEI is an issue?
That whole list seems somewhat questionable without the methodology and underlying information used for the determination.Dirty-8-thirty Ag said:Stat Monitor Repairman said:
Why are airline pilots the only profession on this list where DEI is an issue?
Surprised by the fact that this list states being a garbage/recyclables collector, roofer, delivery driver and farmer/rancher is more dangerous than oil and gas industry work.
SuhrThang said:
Probably had a hot flash or menstrual cramp…
Tom Fox said:I cannot believe these idiots have not experienced DEI in their personal lives.redcrayon said:
Remember this from United?Our flight deck should reflect the diverse group of people on board our planes every day. That’s why we plan for 50% of the 5,000 pilots we train in the next decade to be women or people of color. Learn more and apply now: https://t.co/VbOFvFOksB pic.twitter.com/r0ScH6MQAJ
— United Airlines (@united) April 6, 2021
This stuff is now embedded in our national psyche. You can't blame people for questioning the qualifications of pilots when we were blatantly told they would be hiring based on gender and race. It sucks for the highly qualified and competent female and minority pilots but here we are.