TheEternalOptimist said:
Captain Pablo said:
TheEternalOptimist said:
gabehcoud said:
I can't imagine choosing politics over family. You don't have to agree. Just try not talking politics
"I can not call anyone who supports Elon Musk my parents. He is a Nazi and he gave a Nazi salute'.
Yep. She said that.
Good grief. That's terrible
Is she still in your will?
In a limited capacity.
There are some specific things in her name as well, like long term life insurance, and a small fund we manage.
But she will not receive any part of the bulk of what we leave behind if she persists. Material blessings that are handed down come from persisting under the shade tree of Faith and Love that we provide. That's our view.
I've generally made it a policy to reject to work for those that want to have their will leave different things to different kids rather than splitting it equally (except for specific items like maybe jewelry, etc.). While I'm generally against a non-equal split in general, the main reason I won't do it is because I think when all is said and done, the kids will end up hating each other, hating the testator (parents), and more-so the attorney (i.e. "he talked them into it...").
However, this new breed of total lunacy with kids disassociating with their parents over political issues has started me rethinking the issue. They've purposely chosen to make their parents' lives miserable (beyond that, in fact) due to their mental illness that is at least somewhat controllable.
I haven't made a decision but the more I read things like this -- and I know couples who've had to deal with this absolute stupidity -- the more I think there are valid reasons to differentiate bequests.