The Storm is Here to Stay

10,817 Views | 110 Replies | Last: 10 hrs ago by EskimoJoe
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Swan Song said:

Please read Jeff's Coffee and Covid from today. An amazing piece about how what has been uncovered by DOGE is the root of the complete lack on ingenuity and creativity in art, film, and thought. People have been paid to create instead of actually creating and the result is the extreme decline in culture. This article was one of his best and I've been reading it for years.

https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/the-big-thaw-thursday-february-6?r=dzrj0&utm_medium=ios
Thank you.

As for the OP's article, pretty sure some of it is fiction but I hope the parts with JD Vance are not. Filled potholes and clean water overnight? LOL.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Please elaborate on how each part is unconstitutional. Cite sources.

You last sentence is nothing more than sour grapes.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Please elaborate on how each part is unconstitutional. Cite sources.

You last sentence is nothing more than sour grapes.
Burpelson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elon and his Muppets have out flanked trump
aggiez03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bird Poo said:

Swan Song said:

Please read Jeff's Coffee and Covid from today. An amazing piece about how what has been uncovered by DOGE is the root of the complete lack on ingenuity and creativity in art, film, and thought. People have been paid to create instead of actually creating and the result is the extreme decline in culture. This article was one of his best and I've been reading it for years.

https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/the-big-thaw-thursday-february-6?r=dzrj0&utm_medium=ios
Thank you.

As for the OP's article, pretty sure some of it is fiction but I hope the parts with JD Vance are not. Filled potholes and clean water overnight? LOL.

This is what made it seem like Right Wing Porn to me as well.

How could some code implemented in DC, make potholes get filled in Springfield, OH; Water Systems fixed in MI, or Broadband in Tenn in less than a week.

While potholes could be fixed in a day or two, there is no way water treatment plants received upgrades in a few days.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
This post is meaningless gaslighting fluff with zero substance.

What, specifically, is unconstitutional.

What part of the constitution, specifically, is DOGE violating.

What, specifically, is DOGE doing to violate the constitution.

Why, specifically, is USDS (which is now called DOGE, but is still USDS) doing now that is unconstitutional that USDS has been doing since its inception in 2012 under Obama that was not unconstitutional.

Unsubstantiated claims of "Unconstitutional" with zero analysis of why are just another way of saying: "oh ****, my party is ****ed"
But libs are OK when Soros or others run non-elected interference for the left. They cared nothing for the constitution when they were in power and now the want to hide behind its skirt

There is absolutely no reason to listen to or debate the left. That time ended 4 years ago. Best to squash them like the roaches they are.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.


I have seen flippant remarks about these action being unconstitutional. I am no expert, but I highly doubt it is.

But let's say that it is……getting all of this unnecessary spending ID'd took illegal action…..then so be it. Criminals who use deceit and lies to tap into funds to make payoffs then hide behind laws……still need to be knocked off.

aggiez03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looked into his posting history and AggieAL1 is either a Lib or neverTrumper, so I wouldn't waste any more time on they/them. I know I won't...
Texas Tea
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DaShi said:

fullback44 said:

So my question is "was this all part of the plan? " We are basically just following the path of what went on when Jimmy Carter was a Dem with high inflation then followed up by Reagan with 8 years of government controls and his Reagonomics. I don't fully understand but I've read where Inflation is a necessary evil for America to reduce is dept as a nation to other countries, and you run up inflation by printing money. Now that it has been achieved you bring in a guy like Trump (Elon) to take an ax to federal employees and extreme pork / waste spending. Anyway, seems this is all part of the plan?

As you can see, I'm no economist (lol) just kind of asking the question above

Or is this Deep State removal ?


Debt to gdp increased under Reagan at just as hot a pace as with others. Drug running to fund cia. Gun running.

"Pace" is meaningless. What was the actual debt to GDP ratio then vs now?
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Please elaborate on how each part is unconstitutional. Cite sources.

You last sentence is nothing more than sour grapes.
Like the rule of law has mattered an inkling to the Dem party elite. They have been blatantly flaunting the rule of law since at least cabbage fart's email server.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Parts of that seem to be corroborated with a WaPo article that was covered in Townhall article

Quote:

Representatives from Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service have fed sensitive data from across the Education Department into artificial intelligence software to probe the agency's programs and spending, according to two people with knowledge of the DOGE team's actions.


The AI probe includes data with personally identifiable information for people who manage grants, as well as sensitive internal financial data, the two people said. They described DOGE activities at the Education Department on the condition of anonymity due to fear of retaliation.

The DOGE team is using AI software accessed through Microsoft's cloud computing service Azure to pore through every dollar of money the department disburses, from contracts to grants to work trip expenses, one of the people said. Lower level department staffers were directed by agency leadership to let Musk's teams access the sensitive financial data, the person said.

The use of AI inside the Department of Education, which has not previously been reported, shows how Musk's group, which includes former employees from his tech empire, is tapping the favorite tool of Silicon Valley as part of its mission to drastically slash the size and functions of the federal government.

At the Department of Education, the DOGE's team aims to radically reduce spending and ultimately shrink the department and its staff, the people said helping further the Trump administration's push to get rid of it entirely.

AI used against Deep State

Pretty easy to hash the PII data as really just any unique identifier is needed. Spending accounts all tie back to individuals in the source system so they don't actually need the email address or first/last name to run the model.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas Tea said:

DaShi said:

fullback44 said:

So my question is "was this all part of the plan? " We are basically just following the path of what went on when Jimmy Carter was a Dem with high inflation then followed up by Reagan with 8 years of government controls and his Reagonomics. I don't fully understand but I've read where Inflation is a necessary evil for America to reduce is dept as a nation to other countries, and you run up inflation by printing money. Now that it has been achieved you bring in a guy like Trump (Elon) to take an ax to federal employees and extreme pork / waste spending. Anyway, seems this is all part of the plan?

As you can see, I'm no economist (lol) just kind of asking the question above

Or is this Deep State removal ?


Debt to gdp increased under Reagan at just as hot a pace as with others. Drug running to fund cia. Gun running.

"Pace" is meaningless. What was the actual debt to GDP ratio then vs now?
The point that it grew over time under Reagan, but GDP grew quickly under Reagan, is a valid point.

It grew from about 30% to about 50% under Reagan. Not just a little bump.

It didn't start to decrease until entitlement reform that started under Bush but continued under Clinton. Oh, and Al Gore inventing the internet in 1995 also helped.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Swan Song said:

While media focused on campaign rallies and political theater, a quiet army was being assembled. In offices across DC, veteran strategists mapped the administrative state's pressure points. Think tanks developed action plans for every agency. Policy institutes trained rapid deployment teams. Former appointees shared battlefield intelligence from previous administrations' failures.

By Inauguration Day, over 1,000 pre-vetted personnel stood ready each armed with clear objectives, mapped legal authorities, and direct lines to support networks. This wasn't just staffing; it was a battle plan decades in the making.



Quote:

George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River, which occurred on the night of December 25-26, 1776, during the American Revolutionary War, was the first move in a complex and surprise military maneuver organized by George Washington, the commander-in-chief of the Continental Army, which culminated in their attack on Hessian forces garrisoned at Trenton. The Hessians were German mercenaries hired by the British.

Washington and his troops successfully attacked the Hessian forces in the Battle of Trenton on the morning of December 26, 1776. The military campaign was organized in great secrecy by Washington, who led a column of Continental Army troops from today's Bucks County, Pennsylvania across the icy Delaware River to today's Mercer County, New Jersey in what was one of the Revolutionary War's most logistically challenging and dangerous clandestine operations.
History doesn't always repeat itself, but it often rhymes.
panhandlefarmer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DaShi said:

fullback44 said:

So my question is "was this all part of the plan? " We are basically just following the path of what went on when Jimmy Carter was a Dem with high inflation then followed up by Reagan with 8 years of government controls and his Reagonomics. I don't fully understand but I've read where Inflation is a necessary evil for America to reduce is dept as a nation to other countries, and you run up inflation by printing money. Now that it has been achieved you bring in a guy like Trump (Elon) to take an ax to federal employees and extreme pork / waste spending. Anyway, seems this is all part of the plan?

As you can see, I'm no economist (lol) just kind of asking the question above

Or is this Deep State removal ?


Debt to gdp increased under Reagan at just as hot a pace as with others. Drug running to fund cia. Gun running. Etc


Really? I think it goes back further. I think the first guy that was going to expose it got shot in the head in Dallas
TheWoodlandsTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Everything President Trump and Republicans are doing is constitutional.

Biden and Democrats forcing the vaccine on the public through OSHA, and Biden and Democrats forgiving all student loan debt is unconstitutional. Biden spent his last days in office helping the worst murderers and rapists in modern US history.

The conservative/Republican Supreme Court justices are originalists who actually follow the constitution. The liberal/Democrat Supreme Court justices like Jackson and Sotomayor are DEI hires whose briefs look like they were written by a 2nd grader. The Presidents (Biden/Obama) that appointed the unconstitutional living document Democrat Supreme Court justices even admitted and openly said they are picking DEI hires. Biden narrowed his job search to just 6.5 percent of the total population based on race and gender.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieAL1- You are showing your ignorance regarding the Constitution.
Marvin J. Schiller
Old Sarge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Your side looked upon The Constitution as nothing more than an obstacle, an openly wiped up Biden's drawers with it. You don't think during the last couple years while the "posse" that is exposing the financially weaponized Leftist Griftblast they have not explored this with lawyers? If not, you are a fool.

Your side thought the system was rigged to the point that if, even with unconceivable circumstances like a Trump/Republican being voted in to the Executive Office and a little heat from YOUR MSM would never be able to undo any of it.

Your side did the FAFO route with the 2020 rig job on the election, because of "high and mighty". The "high and mighty" approach rarely works in a Democratic Republic when obvious **** is forced down people's throat, and knows better with way too many obvious markers tell them something is WRONG with the direction they are being told is "the way".

So, welcome to your current "norm", with more to come. Exposure to light, shows the rats and roaches, which by the way, how YOUR side operates. Furthermore, more and more people with half a brain are distrusting YOUR MSM that has covered your sides turds like a cat in a litterbox, and looks for the truth on their own, in outlets that are glad to cover what is being exposed.

Might I suggest TUMS, or perhaps a trip to your GI Doc for something stronger, because this all is going to be hard on your system for while.

As
It
Should
Be
"Green" is the new RED.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a must read that I really want to finish later. Thanks for sharing.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swan Song said:

I have family members that work in government and they are worried for their jobs. Blame Musk and his cronies. Also quite upset that their family has voted for Trump knowing they may lose their jobs.

It's a tough situation.


Government was never meant to be this big. It's not about going after one team. It's about dismantling the bloat. Unfortunately, many quality people are part of the bloat. If they worth a lick, they will end up fine. But you are paid by the taxpayers and the taxpayers don't want you. Time to move on.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.


There are some aspects of what is happening that will eventually need to be addressed by the USSC because they are without precedent. But for which actions precedent does exist, none of them to date have been clearly unconstitutional.

Moreover, the other side spent years weakening the executive and judicial branches of government to wield raw power and go after their political enemies. The USSC has declared NUMEROUS activities by the Obama and Biden administrations unconstitutional over the years. Obama was rebuked in the Supreme Court more than any other president in history.

So spare me the lecture please
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

This is all very good because in the theoretical sense the American system was designed to make a broad support popular revolt possible by non violent or kinetic means. If you got a mandate election that crosses the center line like we just did, it is de-facto like a regime change done with violence and upheaval, but simply by vote.

All the attempts to sabotage such a directive, is in itself more crony and tryanny minded. The legacy MSM in particular had enabled the growth of tyrannical and unaccountable federal government by a massive envelope of gaslighting and outright lies for their favored party, and those aligned with it. Fortunatly in 2024, even a block of the Center liberals simply stopped listening to them. They realized the Dem party and MSM no longer even vaguely looked out for America's interests.

Now to their shock, they are learning they actively worked against those interest and to support an overseas agenda or simple self-enrichment at the expense of America's future.
fightingfarmer09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even if the DOGE department is ruled unconstitutional in 4,5 or 6 months they will have brought to the public so much grotesque waste that it won't matter. You can never put it all back in Pandora's box and they will be forced to pass reform.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

That sounds pretty silly that it could be. If so just rebrand it as a `consulting group' or even some members as Ministers without Portfolio like FDR or any number of terms. Then just sign what they send up to you if you like it.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swan Song said:

I have family members that work in government and they are worried for their jobs. Blame Musk and his cronies. Also quite upset that their family has voted for Trump knowing they may lose their jobs.

It's a tough situation.


Well many of us have had family members in other industries that were hit hard…and sometimes because of the US government (I.e. Obama issuing offshore drilling moratorium)). Welcome to the club. I'm sorry for them if they are good people and patriots. Hope they land on their feet somewhere else.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can I take the time to remind everyone the left was moving down the path of killing off the oil and gas sector in lieu of EV.

A white paper was written that predicted this impact by quantifying how many jobs from welding/fabrication, steel and material supply, valve and piping, engineers and technicians……in essence all positions that would be eliminated. The left was ok with this and even callous in their remark…..they will have to learn to produce code.

As oil and gas has had their ups and down, The left generally celebrates loss of jobs in the O&G sector. I have no issue with government workers who work in redundant positions or do not contribute to the core business lose their jobs.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

You could add to that the Obama/Biden admin basically saying w some of those FAA revelations that some crashes and deaths were acceptable for DEI. Its right those positions being fired.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swan Song said:

I have family members that work in government and they are worried for their jobs. Blame Musk and his cronies. Also quite upset that their family has voted for Trump knowing they may lose their jobs.

It's a tough situation.
Not tough at all. The free ride is over. Most of us in the private sector never live insulated from the realities of management changes and downturns in the economy. Our government has been stealing by from us, including thousands upon thousands who have been grifting while "working from home." I know how teachers handled "WFH," and I have no doubt many thousands of Fed employees cut their productivity similarly and never had to even get back to former levels.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Government employee, I see. Might want to find out if anyone in your organization has a copy of the Constitution you can borrow. Its good reading.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just wait till President Trump's forces uncover a modern day STASI operating in the US: Data mining, identifying, and inflicting thousands of little cuts on the common man whose belief in God, family, and morals conflicted with the STASI swines debauched progressive world view..
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swan Song said:

I have family members that work in government and they are worried for their jobs. Blame Musk and his cronies. Also quite upset that their family has voted for Trump knowing they may lose their jobs.

It's a tough situation.


If their jobs are essential they have little to worry about.
I wish a buck was still silver, it was back, when the country was strong.
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
Piling on a bit, but I feel compelled to add on. The Constitution has been trampled on by the left to get whatever it is they want. The USSC has been course correcting a bit in the last few years - the end of Chevron, a revival of the "major questions" and "non delegation" doctrines (e.g. the OSHA mandate), the CFPB Director firing, the NLRB General Counsel firing. The Court has reminded those in government that the Executive have pretty close to plenary power to run that branch of government, no matter how much Congress and activist lower courts want to take that away.

Trump's team did a great job preparing for the first few weeks. As has already been explained, DOGE is a repurpose of an already-created program. Many of the things being undone were themselves created by EOs - live by the EO, die by the EO.

There's an open-is question about the ability of the Executive NOT to spend money appropriated by Congress, but I'm guessing the USSC will ultimately rule that the Executive has the discretion to spend or not spend once Congress appropriates. Lower court partisans will attempt to slow this down, and that's why it's all happening so fast - to allow these matters to make it to the USSC soon enough to matter.

The Ds may end up regretting these challenges as the Court may ultimately reset much of administrative law over the next 36 months, cementing these reforms. We can only hope that Kavanaugh and Barrett don't gum-up the works. Kavanaugh has been inside the beltway a very long time and Barrett has been a monumental disappointment.
LGB
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Spirit said:

Deep state demolition.
I love every second of it. Unfortunately the deep state nameless bureaucrats are so entrenched it will take years to truly rid the government of them.
Highway6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieAL1 said:

That's all well and good. But not a shred of it is constitutional. Of course, if the Supreme Court continues to trash the Constitution, illegality may reign.
The US Constitution establishes the goals of the US government, including justice, domestic tranquility, and national defense. Just so you know
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Swan Song said:

I have family members that work in government and they are worried for their jobs. Blame Musk and his cronies. Also quite upset that their family has voted for Trump knowing they may lose their jobs.

It's a tough situation.



It's called an intervention. Just like drug addicts, government workers often become addicted to the welfare state that is government employment. Time to send some folks to detox.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.