BMX Bandit said:

---

Quote:

---

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Wednesday designed to prevent people who were biologically assigned male at birth from participating in women's or girls' sporting events.

---

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-transgender-athletes-3606411fc12efffec95a893351624e1b

I will be very interested to see how far he goes with this. (the further the better). I will update once the EO is published

Either way, legislation from Congress has to happen also. its already passed the house, need the senate on board.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-passes-bill-ban-transgender-student-athletes-womens-sports-rcna187703

---

It appears that the order directs the Department of Education from providing funds to schools that do not comply.

Does this mean that the Department of Education now has a legitimate purpose?

We need to do this through legislation passed by both houses and signed into law. That would make it harder to do away with. With an executive order, the next Democratic President can simply write his own executive order to replace this one. And it is quite open for a federal judge to strike it down.

This brings up a question. Are executive orders easier for judges to strike down an executive order than for them to strike down a law that passed both houses of Congress and which was signed into law by the President? I have no idea, but it seems possible that an Executive Order may be easier to strike.

Will try to read later

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/keeping-men-out-of-womens-sports/

Trump knows how to capture the moment with a good picture.

ICONIC

Men don’t belong in women’s sports!

If that statement triggers or upsets you, well… I don’t really care, Margaret. pic.twitter.com/neIOL1ZMg4

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 5, 2025

StandUpforAmerica said:

---

Trump knows how to capture the moment with a good picture.

ICONIC

Men don’t belong in women’s sports!

If that statement triggers or upsets you, well… I don’t really care, Margaret. pic.twitter.com/neIOL1ZMg4

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 5, 2025

---

Biden would malfunction with sensory overload - too much hair to sniff.

My favorite line from the ESPN article on this topic.

Quote:

---

The move is the latest by the Trump administration to limit the rights of the transgender population.

---

100 years from now, people will look back at this transgender lunacy and ask, "WTF were they thinking?"

taxpreparer said:

---

Quote:
President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Wednesday designed to prevent people who were biologically assigned male at birth from participating in women's or girls' sporting events.

The AP is still playing the woke game. "Biologically assigned male at birth." Not "born male."

---

Biologically recorded male at birth.

eric76 said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Quote:

---

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Wednesday designed to prevent people who were biologically assigned male at birth from participating in women's or girls' sporting events.

---

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-transgender-athletes-3606411fc12efffec95a893351624e1b

I will be very interested to see how far he goes with this. (the further the better). I will update once the EO is published

Either way, legislation from Congress has to happen also. its already passed the house, need the senate on board.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-passes-bill-ban-transgender-student-athletes-womens-sports-rcna187703

---

It appears that the order directs the Department of Education from providing funds to schools that do not comply.

Does this mean that the Department of Education now has a legitimate purpose?

We need to do this through legislation passed by both houses and signed into law. That would make it harder to do away with. With an executive order, the next Democratic President can simply write his own executive order to replace this one. And it is quite open for a federal judge to strike it down.

This brings up a question. Are executive orders easier for judges to strike down an executive order than for them to strike down a law that passed both houses of Congress and which was signed into law by the President? I have no idea, but it seems possible that an Executive Order may be easier to strike.

---

Congress is free to do that. In the meantime...

Isn't it funny how you don't have a plethora of biological women wanting to compete in men's sports?

Golly gee, I wonder why.

Old May Banker said:

---

100 years from now, people will look back at this transgender lunacy and ask, "WTF were they thinking?"

---

Oh, you never know…

annie88 said:

---

Isn't it funny how you don't have a plethora of biological women wanting to compete in men's sports?

Golly gee, I wonder why.

---

How does a CNN anchoress confidently state that there is no evidence of any difference between men and women when it comes to sports...and never...ever...wonder why there are no women in the NBA, NFL, etc?

This is what total ideological capture looks like.

Squadron7 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Isn't it funny how you don't have a plethora of biological women wanting to compete in men's sports?

Golly gee, I wonder why.

---

How does a CNN anchoress confidently state that there is no evidence of any difference between men and women when it comes to sports...and never...ever...wonder why there are no women in the NBA, NFL, etc?

This is what total ideological capture looks like.

---

I think some of them are dumb enough to believe that, but I think most of them don't really believe it. They just want to push a woke agenda. They really like to push the trans and everyone is a victim crap.

JUST IN: Over a dozen Democratic state attorneys general sue President Trump after he banned sex change surgeries for anyone under 19

Why are dems obsessed with slicing the genitalia off of children? pic.twitter.com/Zly5PtceZN

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) February 6, 2025

Squadron7 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Isn't it funny how you don't have a plethora of biological women wanting to compete in men's sports?

Golly gee, I wonder why.

---

How does a CNN anchoress confidently state that there is no evidence of any difference between men and women when it comes to sports...and never...ever...wonder why there are no women in the NBA, NFL, etc?

This is what total ideological capture looks like.

---

They're being paid $37 million by USAID?

******s not gonna be able to beat up on women/girls at Olympics in 28.

"In Los Angeles in 2028, my administration will not stand by and watch men beat and batter female athletes, and we're just not going to let it happen, and it's going to end," Trump added. "And it's ending right now, and nobody's going to be able to do a damn thing about it because when I speak, we speak with authority. And, for the same reason just to make sure, I'm also directing our Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem……to deny any and all visa applications made by men attempting to fraudulently enter the United States while identifying themselves as women athletes, trying [to] get into the games."

StandUpforAmerica said:

---

My favorite line from the ESPN article on this topic.

Quote:

---

The move is the latest by the Trump administration to limit the rights of the transgender population.

---

---

If only they would realize there is no transgender population, since being trans is not possible. Everything becomes clearer, more in focus, with the realization there is no such thing as trans.

Old May Banker said:

---

100 years from now, people will look back at this transgender lunacy and ask, "WTF were they thinking?"

---

We don't need to wait 100 years.

Many of us have been asking this question for several years already.

I am glad President Donald Trump signed an executive order to prevent people who were biologically assigned male at birth from participating in women's or girls' sporting events. Biological men do not belong in women's sports.

Jim Carrey is not Andy Kaufman...

Or, is he...?

Quote:

---

Sec.3. Preserving Women's Sports in Education. (a) In furtherance of the purposes of Title IX, the Secretary of Education shall promptly:
(i) in coordination with the Attorney General, continue to comply with the vacatur of the rule entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance" of April 29, 2024, 89 FR 33474, see Tennessee v. Cardona, 24-cv-00072 at 13-15 (E.D. Ky. 2025), and take other appropriate action to ensure this regulation does not have effect;

---

ends the Biden EO. See judges order outlining how unlawful and egregious it was.

Quote:

---

(ii) take all appropriate action to affirmatively protect all-female athletic opportunities and all-female locker rooms and thereby provide the equal opportunity guaranteed by Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, including enforcement actions described in subsection (iii); to bring regulations and policy guidance into line with the Congress' existing demand for "equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes" by clearly specifying and clarifying that women's sports are reserved for women; and the resolution of pending litigation consistent with this policy; and
(iii) prioritize Title IX enforcement actions against educational institutions (including athletic associations composed of or governed by such institutions) that deny female students an equal opportunity to participate in sports and athletic events by requiring them, in the women's category, to compete with or against or to appear unclothed before males.
(b) All executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall review grants to educational programs and, where appropriate, rescind funding to programs that fail to comply with the policy established in this order.
(c) The Department of Justice shall provide all necessary resources, in accordance with law, to relevant agencies to ensure expeditious enforcement of the policy established in this order.

---

no more men in women locker rooms. Punish those schools that violate this accordingly as permitted by law

Quote:

---

Sec. 4. Preserving Fairness and Safety in Women's Sports. Many sport-specific governing bodies have no official position or requirements regarding trans-identifying athletes. Others allow men to compete in women's categories if these men reduce the testosterone in their bodies below certain levels or provide documentation of "sincerely held" gender identity. These policies are unfair to female athletes and do not protect female safety. To address these concerns, it is hereby ordered:
(a) The Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy shall, within 60 days of the date of this order:
(i) convene representatives of major athletic organizations and governing bodies, and female athletes harmed by such policies, to promote policies that are fair and safe, in the best interests of female athletes, and consistent with the requirements of Title IX, as applicable; and
(ii) convene State Attorneys General to identify best practices in defining and enforcing equal opportunities for women to participate in sports and educate them about stories of women and girls who have been harmed by male participation in women's sports.

---

Work with states and leagues on Safety for girl athletes.

Quote:

---

(b) The Secretary of State, including through the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs' Sports Diplomacy Division and the Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations, shall:
(i) rescind support for and participation in people-to-people sports exchanges or other sports programs within which the relevant female sports category is based on identity and not sex; and
(ii) promote, including at the United Nations, international rules and norms governing sports competition to protect a sex-based female sports category, and, at the discretion of the Secretary of State, convene international athletic organizations and governing bodies, and female athletes harmed by policies that allow male participation in women's sports, to promote sporting policies that are fair, safe, and in furtherance of the best interests of female athletes.
(c) The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall review and adjust, as needed, policies permitting admission to the United States of males seeking to participate in women's sports, and shall issue guidance with an objective of preventing such entry to the extent permitted by law, including pursuant to section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(C)(i)).
(d) The Secretary of State shall use all appropriate and available measures to see that the International Olympic Committee amends the standards governing Olympic sporting events to promote fairness, safety, and the best interests of female athletes by ensuring that eligibility for participation in women's sporting events is determined according to sex and not gender identity or testosterone reduction.

---

no trans athletes allowed to enter US for the LA 28 Olympics.


this is a fantastic EO from Trump. All well within the power of the executive and all much needed


Congressional action is still imperative

Trump Education Dept to probe SJSU, UPenn for potential Title IX violations after trans athlete scandals, PENN SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THIS 💩 CRAP https://t.co/mnVttBdKiC

— Michael Fengfish (@MichaelFengfish) February 6, 2025

this is the way

Squadron7 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

Isn't it funny how you don't have a plethora of biological women wanting to compete in men's sports?

Golly gee, I wonder why.

---

How does a CNN anchoress confidently state that there is no evidence of any difference between men and women when it comes to sports...and never...ever...wonder why there are no women in the NBA, NFL, etc?

This is what total ideological capture looks like.

---

She wasn't hired for her intelligence nor logic skills.

She was hired because she looks good on camera and is able to read a teleprompter.

This is true of most of the reporters and anchors you see on the news.

will25u said:

---

JUST IN: Over a dozen Democratic state attorneys general sue President Trump after he banned sex change surgeries for anyone under 19

Why are dems obsessed with slicing the genitalia off of children? pic.twitter.com/Zly5PtceZN

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) February 6, 2025

---

From above:

"Why are dems obsessed with slicing the genitalia off of children?"

Because it is a kink.

There are some dems that are aroused by the mutilation of genitalia, especially children.

Most dems are just really in to anything that they think is against "the establishment". It gives them a source of false righteous anger that feels good.

Democrats really do make stands for the silliest things. Especially when even their constituents don't even agree with them. Just goes to show that they don't really listen to the people they represent.

CNN: “You rarely get 79% of the country to agree on anything — but they do, in fact, agree on the idea of opposing” men in women’s sports.

pic.twitter.com/MpjPqjNyIU

— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) February 6, 2025

"This is like Trump's superpower. Finding a bunch of 80-20 issues and getting on the 80 and everybody who is reflexively against him gets on the 20. Now the Democrat Party has a 31% approval rating. This is why!"

Brilliant analysis on how TDS has driven the left to insanity. pic.twitter.com/nAg74HxQPe

— Brigitte Gabriel (@ACTBrigitte) February 6, 2025

"Sorry, Mr. Schlong McDongerton, Women's sports is closed. Moose out front should have told 'ya."

I love the photograph below!

Trump and Republicans support women. Democrats forced men into:

• women's restrooms;
• women's locker rooms; and,
• women's sports.

It's a start...

The NCAA issued a statement in response to Trump’s EO banning men from women’s sports. They say they will take steps to align NCAA policy with the new standards.

WINNING 🥇 pic.twitter.com/RZbxTnwPfH

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 6, 2025

Saw this pop up yesterday...interesting perspective and something I never thought about...mainly cause never in a million years would I think about transitioning my kids.

But these parents will never admit they are wrong...because doing that means admitting you did the absolute worst thing humanly possible to YOUR CHILD.

This is the perfect explanation of why parents who submitted to the child mutilation cult will never be able to come to terms with what they have done to those they were meant protect above anyone else on earth.

pic.twitter.com/sdsAlyPipv

— Laurence Fox (@LozzaFox) February 5, 2025

TravelAg2004 said:

---

Saw this pop up yesterday...interesting perspective and something I never thought about...mainly cause never in a million years would I think about transitioning my kids.

But these parents will never admit they are wrong...because doing that means admitting you did the absolute worst thing humanly possible to YOUR CHILD.

This is the perfect explanation of why parents who submitted to the child mutilation cult will never be able to come to terms with what they have done to those they were meant protect above anyone else on earth.

pic.twitter.com/sdsAlyPipv

— Laurence Fox (@LozzaFox) February 5, 2025

---

Yep. The vast majority of the abusive parents who sexually mutilated their children to get applause from the woke perverts will still say that they 'did it for the good of their child'.

A good percentage will even double down. They will push to overturn the EOs to allow continued mutilations. Some will even support illegally transitioning kids, comparing themselves to the underground railroad from the 1800s.

If you can be ok mentally with mutilating your child for your own gain you have the type of mind and moral code to continue to be ok with it.

Powerful. Know a mom just like that. Tragic.

I do think there are parents (seems like mostly moms) who aggressively encourage "transitioning" for social media adulation, similar to Munchasen by proxy.

However, I think there's another group of loving parents who are blackmailed by activist counselors or doctors. They tell loving parents their kids will kill themselves. It's the whole "you can have a dead son or a live daughter."

That, of course, is a lie. Those who blackmail loving parents to mutilate their kids deserve to be hanged. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of a single one who's been punished.

Iraq2xVeteran said:

---

I am glad President Donald Trump signed an executive order to prevent people who were biologically assigned male at birth from participating in women's or girls' sporting events. Biological men do not belong in women's sports.

---

I miss the old days when no-one included the word "biological" before saying someone is a man or woman.

Also, anyone who uses the phrase "assigned male/female at birth" needs to be taken into a shed and beat unconscious or until they stop being dumb ****s.

He showed all TEN of those transgenders that were participating. Lol

At any rate, glad there is now a uniformed rule to make it fair for everyone

So 10 slots taken from women.

What is the acceptable number to you?

b_rad said:

---

Need to go back and award 1st place trophies to the women that came in 2nd. Invite all of them to the White House and award them on national tv.

---

What about all the female collegiate swimmers who were forced to share a dressing room with an intact biological male? Can they sue for damages now?