whatthehey78 said:

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Was this tape a part of the documents release? LBJ involvement wouldn't be a big surprise and may have been a reason for his not running for a second term.

---

LBJ involvement would be a giant surprise that would lead to massive rewriting of history.

---

Should have added, "wouldn't be a big surprise to me". The man was manipulative and powerful in certain circles. He has been mentioned in some conspiracy theories.

---

He has been mentioned in many conspiracies and anyone that has read Robert Caro's books knows why.

I have no doubt that killing someone is in the realm of possibility for LBJ.

But there is also absolutely zero evidence that LBJ was involved in any conspiracy. And we have TONS of documentation on his life, his friends, his enemies, and his own (pretty awful) recordings.

---

You do know "incriminating evidence" often has a tendency to disappear??? ESPECIALLY in high stakes cases...not to mention when the govt. and US integrity is possibly jeopardized!

---

So simultaneously so perfectly planned and executed that they were able to destroy, hide, or otherwise manipulate every single shred of evidence that would implicate them... while also being so sloppy that the shooter was arrested in a theater because the exit strategy was not planned at all. And it wasn't LBJ's cronies that spearheaded the investigation, it was the local PD. Not the FBI, not the CIA, not LBJ's buddies. No evidence ever found that there was a second shooter and the ballistics don't support that assertion.

It's just extremely hilarious that every nutball idea has to rely on "well, all the evidence was obviously destroyed... every single solidarity piece. And every one involved stayed true to LBJ, even after LBJ's death a decade later. Yes, despite the extreme wealth that would have come with writing a book that would expose the conspiracy, all of them took it to their death bed, even after LBJ's death rather than use that knowledge to benefit themselves, their families, or children."

60 years seems long enough for the deep state to make any real information vanish.

sam callahan said:

---

They have bungled the release of these and Epstein documents so badly, nobody will believe anything that does eventually get released.

Just wait until some document from 1965 is shown to have been made in Microsoft Word

---

No one that was convinced that a conspiracy was involved without any evidence whatsoever supporting that conclusion was ever going to be satisfied no matter what was released.

Trump's admin is even more incompetent than we thought. Or the deep state is stronger than we could ever imagine.

Edit for next post; I hope I stand corrected

BREAKING: 🚨 JFK File DATA DUMP on the national archives has begun..

📍 [THREAD] - Files pic.twitter.com/0lZOB4jQuu https://t.co/qtb4yDW6f3

— E X X ➠A L E R T S (@ExxAlerts) March 18, 2025

The JFK files have been released. https://t.co/seZ2NDhWO1

— Thomas Sowell Quotes (@ThomasSowell) March 18, 2025

Have fun if anything is even interesting

I've heard stories of Bush Sr in the past, where does he fit into all of this JFK stuff ?

Just checking random files

Cuba disruption is a part of the file

I think the points made in this video are interesting and likely the reason why information has been withheld as long as it has.

fullback44 said:

---

I've heard stories of Bush Sr in the past, where does he fit into all of this JFK stuff ?

---

He ran for and won Chairman of the Harris County GOP in Feb 1963. Maybe he killed JFK in Dallas to make Dallas look bad.

Guitarsoup said:

---

fullback44 said:

---

I've heard stories of Bush Sr in the past, where does he fit into all of this JFK stuff ?

---

He ran for and won Chairman of the Harris County GOP in Feb 1963. Maybe he killed JFK in Dallas to make Dallas look bad.

---

George didn't remember where he was when he learned of the murder.

nortex97 said:

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

fullback44 said:

---

I've heard stories of Bush Sr in the past, where does he fit into all of this JFK stuff ?

---

He ran for and won Chairman of the Harris County GOP in Feb 1963. Maybe he killed JFK in Dallas to make Dallas look bad.

---

George didn't remember where he was when he learned of the murder.

---

Everyone remembers. Just like everyone remembers where they were on 9/11.

nortex97 said:

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

fullback44 said:

---

I've heard stories of Bush Sr in the past, where does he fit into all of this JFK stuff ?

---

He ran for and won Chairman of the Harris County GOP in Feb 1963. Maybe he killed JFK in Dallas to make Dallas look bad.

---

George didn't remember where he was when he learned of the murder.

---

[citation needed]

That's just a bull**** lie that Russ Baker made up.

Exactly. "Somewhere in Texas."

People will believe what they want to.

Turns out JFK had information that would lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton

nortex97 said:

---

Exactly. "Somewhere in Texas."

People will believe what they want to.

---

Exactly right. People will believe what they want to.

They will even believe unsourced lies made up by Russ Baker that have no factual backing.

Russ Baker putting his own made up stories on his own website does not constitute a source.


41 was speaking at the Kiwanis Club of Tyler, Texas when JFK was shot.

Some of yall wouid believe Bush worked with RFK to birth Epstein in a secret lab of it was on the internet!

Im Gipper said:

---

Some of yall wouid believe Bush worked with RFK to birth Epstein in a secret lab of it was on the internet!

---

It was NOT a secret lab! It was the one that Anthony Fauci funded using tax dollars!!!!

The bush clan was dirty. See, W at Trump's inauguration. They (and yes it's more than one, or two or three) are still mad Trump is unveiling more of the history.

Guitarsoup said:

---

fullback44 said:

---

I've heard stories of Bush Sr in the past, where does he fit into all of this JFK stuff ?

---

He ran for and won Chairman of the Harris County GOP in Feb 1963. Maybe he killed JFK in Dallas to make Dallas look bad.

---

Dallas does that all by itself

Quote:

---

41 was speaking at the Kiwanis Club of Tyler, Texas when JFK was shot.

---

He set up his alibi with a clone.

Everyone knows he was the one that drove the getaway van from the grassy knoll!

nortex97 said:

---

The bush clan was dirty. See, W at Trump's inauguration. They (and yes it's more than one, or two or three) are still mad Trump is unveiling more of the history.

---

Ahh, so that is why you have no problems lying and spreading misinformation about HW.

Funny you call other people dirty.

Guitarsoup said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Was this tape a part of the documents release? LBJ involvement wouldn't be a big surprise and may have been a reason for his not running for a second term.

---

LBJ involvement would be a giant surprise that would lead to massive rewriting of history.

---

Should have added, "wouldn't be a big surprise to me". The man was manipulative and powerful in certain circles. He has been mentioned in some conspiracy theories.

---

He has been mentioned in many conspiracies and anyone that has read Robert Caro's books knows why.

I have no doubt that killing someone is in the realm of possibility for LBJ.

But there is also absolutely zero evidence that LBJ was involved in any conspiracy. And we have TONS of documentation on his life, his friends, his enemies, and his own (pretty awful) recordings.

---

You do know "incriminating evidence" often has a tendency to disappear??? ESPECIALLY in high stakes cases...not to mention when the govt. and US integrity is possibly jeopardized!

---

So simultaneously so perfectly planned and executed that they were able to destroy, hide, or otherwise manipulate every single shred of evidence that would implicate them... while also being so sloppy that the shooter was arrested in a theater because the exit strategy was not planned at all. And it wasn't LBJ's cronies that spearheaded the investigation, it was the local PD. Not the FBI, not the CIA, not LBJ's buddies. No evidence ever found that there was a second shooter and the ballistics don't support that assertion.

It's just extremely hilarious that every nutball idea has to rely on "well, all the evidence was obviously destroyed... every single solidarity piece. And every one involved stayed true to LBJ, even after LBJ's death a decade later. Yes, despite the extreme wealth that would have come with writing a book that would expose the conspiracy, all of them took it to their death bed, even after LBJ's death rather than use that knowledge to benefit themselves, their families, or children."

---

Believe what and trust who you want. Given our history, I'm pretty damn selective when the govt. is involved. Viet Nam vet and my son is a "WMD" victim...so, we'll keep em at 2 or 10 arm's length.

Oh...and yes, the 3 ltr agencies are experts at "losing" (lol) key evidence when it suits their motive.

whatthehey78 said:

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

fc2112 said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Was this tape a part of the documents release? LBJ involvement wouldn't be a big surprise and may have been a reason for his not running for a second term.

---

LBJ involvement would be a giant surprise that would lead to massive rewriting of history.

---

Should have added, "wouldn't be a big surprise to me". The man was manipulative and powerful in certain circles. He has been mentioned in some conspiracy theories.

---

He has been mentioned in many conspiracies and anyone that has read Robert Caro's books knows why.

I have no doubt that killing someone is in the realm of possibility for LBJ.

But there is also absolutely zero evidence that LBJ was involved in any conspiracy. And we have TONS of documentation on his life, his friends, his enemies, and his own (pretty awful) recordings.

---

You do know "incriminating evidence" often has a tendency to disappear??? ESPECIALLY in high stakes cases...not to mention when the govt. and US integrity is possibly jeopardized!

---

So simultaneously so perfectly planned and executed that they were able to destroy, hide, or otherwise manipulate every single shred of evidence that would implicate them... while also being so sloppy that the shooter was arrested in a theater because the exit strategy was not planned at all. And it wasn't LBJ's cronies that spearheaded the investigation, it was the local PD. Not the FBI, not the CIA, not LBJ's buddies. No evidence ever found that there was a second shooter and the ballistics don't support that assertion.

It's just extremely hilarious that every nutball idea has to rely on "well, all the evidence was obviously destroyed... every single solidarity piece. And every one involved stayed true to LBJ, even after LBJ's death a decade later. Yes, despite the extreme wealth that would have come with writing a book that would expose the conspiracy, all of them took it to their death bed, even after LBJ's death rather than use that knowledge to benefit themselves, their families, or children."

---

Believe what and trust who you want. Given our history, I'm pretty damn selective when the govt. is involved. Viet Nam vet and my son is a "WMD" victim...so, we'll keep em at 2 or 10 arm's length.

Oh...and yes, the 3 ltr agencies are experts at "losing" (lol) key evidence when it suits their motive.

---

Except they aren't experts at it. In fact, we know what ****heads they were specifically because they were so incredibly bad at executing plans and hiding failures.

They were exposed time and time again. But somehow this one time they pulled off the perfect operation, with the perfect patsy, and left no trace? And not only that, but not a single person spilled the beans to enrich themselves or their families like Mark Felt (Deepthroat) did?

Yeah, the theory does not track, no matter how much you distrust the government. We both have a healthy distrust specifically because we know how they continually **** up and we know that because the ****ups are known.

Guess you missed W at the inauguration. Dirty, dirty, dirty! Smirked because he grabbed the audio recordings that laid it all out!

itsyourboypookie said:

---

How long has this been known?

After hearing this conversation I don't think we even need the JFK files to understand what happened. pic.twitter.com/qymAwasApB

— Freyja™ (@FreyjaTarte) March 17, 2025

---

I wish I had seen that video years ago. I might have gotten the nerve to ask Billie Sol what he knew about the assassination when Billie sat down at a table with my father and I at the U Bar U restaurant.

From the JFK Files. Does this confirm the CIA was responsible? pic.twitter.com/QU0EtbhYld

— Washingtons ghost (@hartgoat) March 19, 2025

Reportedly, Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald met at a nightclub weeks before JFK was shot, per JFK files

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) March 19, 2025

Who?mikejones! said:

---

From the JFK Files. Does this confirm the CIA was responsible? pic.twitter.com/QU0EtbhYld

— Washingtons ghost (@hartgoat) March 19, 2025

---

This is the CIA guy that Jim Garrison referenced.

This isn't a new document. It was discussed and quoted in Reclaiming History.

Here's the longer version that has been in the public domain for decades: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10170-10145.pdf

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Reportedly, Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald met at a nightclub weeks before JFK was shot, per JFK files

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) March 19, 2025

---

Right. That's why people are parroting it without any actual source or document.

Guitarsoup said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Reportedly, Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald met at a nightclub weeks before JFK was shot, per JFK files

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) March 19, 2025

---

Right. That's why people are parroting it without any actual source or document.

---

I've been waiting decades in hiding to reveal this. It happened.

I didn't die in prison.

What’s this mean. CIA did watergate? #watergate #cia #jfk #jfkfiles pic.twitter.com/HpvqHAVZQk

— Librarytarian (@boomshakolata) March 19, 2025

#jfkfiles pic.twitter.com/3e4U35SUKN

— MinnesotaGuy (@theconservati15) March 19, 2025